Cargando…
Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis
INTRODUCTION: WHO/UNAIDS recommended Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision in 2007 based on systematic review of observational studies prior to 1999 and three randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To inform updated WHO guidance, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of impact of circumcisi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32558344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25490 |
_version_ | 1783548079984607232 |
---|---|
author | Farley, Timothy MM Samuelson, Julia Grabowski, M Kate Ameyan, Wole Gray, Ronald H Baggaley, Rachel |
author_facet | Farley, Timothy MM Samuelson, Julia Grabowski, M Kate Ameyan, Wole Gray, Ronald H Baggaley, Rachel |
author_sort | Farley, Timothy MM |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: WHO/UNAIDS recommended Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision in 2007 based on systematic review of observational studies prior to 1999 and three randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To inform updated WHO guidance, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of impact of circumcision on the risk of HIV infection among heterosexual men. METHODS: Studies in PubMed of HIV incidence and changes in prevalence in heterosexual men by circumcision status were identified. Pooled incidence rate ratios were computed using fixed‐ and random‐effects meta‐analysis and risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS‐I tool. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In three RCTs, the pooled incidence ratio was 0.41 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.56), with risk difference 10 (8 to 12) fewer infections per 1000 person‐years (py). Pooled incidence ratios were 0.34 (0.24 to 0.49) in two post‐RCT follow‐up studies, 0.29 (0.19 to 0.43) in men at high HIV risk (five cohorts), 0.48 (0.33 to 0.70) in four community‐based cohorts before circumcision scale‐up, and 0.56 (0.49 to 0.64) (7 [6 to 8] fewer per 1000 py) in six community‐based cohorts during circumcision and antiretroviral treatment scale‐up. Heterogeneity between studies was low except in men at high HIV risk. We estimated 520,000 (425,000 to 605,000) fewer infections occurred in men by end of 2018 from 22.7 million circumcisions performed since 2008 and increasing by 155,000 (125,000 to 180,000) annually if epidemic conditions remain similar. After exclusion of studies with high risk of bias and those conducted outside Africa, pooled incidence ratios were similar. There was no evidence of confounding nor changes in risk behaviour following circumcision. In post‐hoc exploratory analyses we observed a trend of decreasing effectiveness of circumcision in cohorts with lower HIV incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of medical male circumcision on HIV incidence from randomized controlled trials was supported by effectiveness from observational studies in populations with diverse HIV risk and changing epidemic contexts. Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision remains an important evidence‐based intervention for control of generalized HIV epidemics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7303540 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73035402020-06-19 Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis Farley, Timothy MM Samuelson, Julia Grabowski, M Kate Ameyan, Wole Gray, Ronald H Baggaley, Rachel J Int AIDS Soc Reviews INTRODUCTION: WHO/UNAIDS recommended Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision in 2007 based on systematic review of observational studies prior to 1999 and three randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To inform updated WHO guidance, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of impact of circumcision on the risk of HIV infection among heterosexual men. METHODS: Studies in PubMed of HIV incidence and changes in prevalence in heterosexual men by circumcision status were identified. Pooled incidence rate ratios were computed using fixed‐ and random‐effects meta‐analysis and risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS‐I tool. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In three RCTs, the pooled incidence ratio was 0.41 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.56), with risk difference 10 (8 to 12) fewer infections per 1000 person‐years (py). Pooled incidence ratios were 0.34 (0.24 to 0.49) in two post‐RCT follow‐up studies, 0.29 (0.19 to 0.43) in men at high HIV risk (five cohorts), 0.48 (0.33 to 0.70) in four community‐based cohorts before circumcision scale‐up, and 0.56 (0.49 to 0.64) (7 [6 to 8] fewer per 1000 py) in six community‐based cohorts during circumcision and antiretroviral treatment scale‐up. Heterogeneity between studies was low except in men at high HIV risk. We estimated 520,000 (425,000 to 605,000) fewer infections occurred in men by end of 2018 from 22.7 million circumcisions performed since 2008 and increasing by 155,000 (125,000 to 180,000) annually if epidemic conditions remain similar. After exclusion of studies with high risk of bias and those conducted outside Africa, pooled incidence ratios were similar. There was no evidence of confounding nor changes in risk behaviour following circumcision. In post‐hoc exploratory analyses we observed a trend of decreasing effectiveness of circumcision in cohorts with lower HIV incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of medical male circumcision on HIV incidence from randomized controlled trials was supported by effectiveness from observational studies in populations with diverse HIV risk and changing epidemic contexts. Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision remains an important evidence‐based intervention for control of generalized HIV epidemics. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7303540/ /pubmed/32558344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25490 Text en © 2020 World Health Organization; licensed by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or the article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's URL. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Farley, Timothy MM Samuelson, Julia Grabowski, M Kate Ameyan, Wole Gray, Ronald H Baggaley, Rachel Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title | Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full | Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_short | Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis |
title_sort | impact of male circumcision on risk of hiv infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303540/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32558344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25490 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farleytimothymm impactofmalecircumcisiononriskofhivinfectioninmeninachangingepidemiccontextsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT samuelsonjulia impactofmalecircumcisiononriskofhivinfectioninmeninachangingepidemiccontextsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT grabowskimkate impactofmalecircumcisiononriskofhivinfectioninmeninachangingepidemiccontextsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ameyanwole impactofmalecircumcisiononriskofhivinfectioninmeninachangingepidemiccontextsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT grayronaldh impactofmalecircumcisiononriskofhivinfectioninmeninachangingepidemiccontextsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT baggaleyrachel impactofmalecircumcisiononriskofhivinfectioninmeninachangingepidemiccontextsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |