Cargando…

Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis

INTRODUCTION: WHO/UNAIDS recommended Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision in 2007 based on systematic review of observational studies prior to 1999 and three randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To inform updated WHO guidance, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of impact of circumcisi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farley, Timothy MM, Samuelson, Julia, Grabowski, M Kate, Ameyan, Wole, Gray, Ronald H, Baggaley, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32558344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25490
_version_ 1783548079984607232
author Farley, Timothy MM
Samuelson, Julia
Grabowski, M Kate
Ameyan, Wole
Gray, Ronald H
Baggaley, Rachel
author_facet Farley, Timothy MM
Samuelson, Julia
Grabowski, M Kate
Ameyan, Wole
Gray, Ronald H
Baggaley, Rachel
author_sort Farley, Timothy MM
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: WHO/UNAIDS recommended Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision in 2007 based on systematic review of observational studies prior to 1999 and three randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To inform updated WHO guidance, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of impact of circumcision on the risk of HIV infection among heterosexual men. METHODS: Studies in PubMed of HIV incidence and changes in prevalence in heterosexual men by circumcision status were identified. Pooled incidence rate ratios were computed using fixed‐ and random‐effects meta‐analysis and risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS‐I tool. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In three RCTs, the pooled incidence ratio was 0.41 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.56), with risk difference 10 (8 to 12) fewer infections per 1000 person‐years (py). Pooled incidence ratios were 0.34 (0.24 to 0.49) in two post‐RCT follow‐up studies, 0.29 (0.19 to 0.43) in men at high HIV risk (five cohorts), 0.48 (0.33 to 0.70) in four community‐based cohorts before circumcision scale‐up, and 0.56 (0.49 to 0.64) (7 [6 to 8] fewer per 1000 py) in six community‐based cohorts during circumcision and antiretroviral treatment scale‐up. Heterogeneity between studies was low except in men at high HIV risk. We estimated 520,000 (425,000 to 605,000) fewer infections occurred in men by end of 2018 from 22.7 million circumcisions performed since 2008 and increasing by 155,000 (125,000 to 180,000) annually if epidemic conditions remain similar. After exclusion of studies with high risk of bias and those conducted outside Africa, pooled incidence ratios were similar. There was no evidence of confounding nor changes in risk behaviour following circumcision. In post‐hoc exploratory analyses we observed a trend of decreasing effectiveness of circumcision in cohorts with lower HIV incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of medical male circumcision on HIV incidence from randomized controlled trials was supported by effectiveness from observational studies in populations with diverse HIV risk and changing epidemic contexts. Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision remains an important evidence‐based intervention for control of generalized HIV epidemics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7303540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73035402020-06-19 Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis Farley, Timothy MM Samuelson, Julia Grabowski, M Kate Ameyan, Wole Gray, Ronald H Baggaley, Rachel J Int AIDS Soc Reviews INTRODUCTION: WHO/UNAIDS recommended Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision in 2007 based on systematic review of observational studies prior to 1999 and three randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To inform updated WHO guidance, we conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of impact of circumcision on the risk of HIV infection among heterosexual men. METHODS: Studies in PubMed of HIV incidence and changes in prevalence in heterosexual men by circumcision status were identified. Pooled incidence rate ratios were computed using fixed‐ and random‐effects meta‐analysis and risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS‐I tool. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In three RCTs, the pooled incidence ratio was 0.41 (95% CI 0.30 to 0.56), with risk difference 10 (8 to 12) fewer infections per 1000 person‐years (py). Pooled incidence ratios were 0.34 (0.24 to 0.49) in two post‐RCT follow‐up studies, 0.29 (0.19 to 0.43) in men at high HIV risk (five cohorts), 0.48 (0.33 to 0.70) in four community‐based cohorts before circumcision scale‐up, and 0.56 (0.49 to 0.64) (7 [6 to 8] fewer per 1000 py) in six community‐based cohorts during circumcision and antiretroviral treatment scale‐up. Heterogeneity between studies was low except in men at high HIV risk. We estimated 520,000 (425,000 to 605,000) fewer infections occurred in men by end of 2018 from 22.7 million circumcisions performed since 2008 and increasing by 155,000 (125,000 to 180,000) annually if epidemic conditions remain similar. After exclusion of studies with high risk of bias and those conducted outside Africa, pooled incidence ratios were similar. There was no evidence of confounding nor changes in risk behaviour following circumcision. In post‐hoc exploratory analyses we observed a trend of decreasing effectiveness of circumcision in cohorts with lower HIV incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy of medical male circumcision on HIV incidence from randomized controlled trials was supported by effectiveness from observational studies in populations with diverse HIV risk and changing epidemic contexts. Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision remains an important evidence‐based intervention for control of generalized HIV epidemics. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7303540/ /pubmed/32558344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25490 Text en © 2020 World Health Organization; licensed by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of the International AIDS Society. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution IGO License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/legalcode which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited. In any reproduction of this article there should not be any suggestion that WHO or the article endorse any specific organization or products. The use of the WHO logo is not permitted. This notice should be preserved along with the article's URL.
spellingShingle Reviews
Farley, Timothy MM
Samuelson, Julia
Grabowski, M Kate
Ameyan, Wole
Gray, Ronald H
Baggaley, Rachel
Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Impact of male circumcision on risk of HIV infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort impact of male circumcision on risk of hiv infection in men in a changing epidemic context – systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32558344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25490
work_keys_str_mv AT farleytimothymm impactofmalecircumcisiononriskofhivinfectioninmeninachangingepidemiccontextsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT samuelsonjulia impactofmalecircumcisiononriskofhivinfectioninmeninachangingepidemiccontextsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT grabowskimkate impactofmalecircumcisiononriskofhivinfectioninmeninachangingepidemiccontextsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ameyanwole impactofmalecircumcisiononriskofhivinfectioninmeninachangingepidemiccontextsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT grayronaldh impactofmalecircumcisiononriskofhivinfectioninmeninachangingepidemiccontextsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT baggaleyrachel impactofmalecircumcisiononriskofhivinfectioninmeninachangingepidemiccontextsystematicreviewandmetaanalysis