Cargando…

Implementing shared decision-making on acute psychiatric wards: a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS)

AIMS: Although shared decision-making (SDM) has the potential to improve health outcomes, psychiatrists often exclude patients with more severe mental illnesses or more acute conditions from participation in treatment decisions. This study examines whether SDM is facilitated by an approach which is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamann, J., Holzhüter, F., Blakaj, S., Becher, S., Haller, B., Landgrebe, M., Schmauß, M., Heres, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32539907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796020000505
_version_ 1783548135995342848
author Hamann, J.
Holzhüter, F.
Blakaj, S.
Becher, S.
Haller, B.
Landgrebe, M.
Schmauß, M.
Heres, S.
author_facet Hamann, J.
Holzhüter, F.
Blakaj, S.
Becher, S.
Haller, B.
Landgrebe, M.
Schmauß, M.
Heres, S.
author_sort Hamann, J.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Although shared decision-making (SDM) has the potential to improve health outcomes, psychiatrists often exclude patients with more severe mental illnesses or more acute conditions from participation in treatment decisions. This study examines whether SDM is facilitated by an approach which is specifically adapted to the needs of acutely ill patients (SDM-PLUS). METHODS: The study is a multi-centre, cluster-randomised, non-blinded, controlled trial of SDM-PLUS in 12 acute psychiatric wards of five psychiatric hospitals addressing inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. All patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were consecutively recruited for the trial at the time of their admission to the ward. Treatment teams of intervention wards were trained in the SDM-PLUS approach through participation in two half-day workshops. Patients on intervention wards received group training in SDM. Staff (and patients) of the control wards acted under ‘treatment as usual’ conditions. The primary outcome parameter was the patients' perceived involvement in decision-making at 3 weeks after study enrolment, analysed using a random-effects linear regression model. RESULTS: In total, 161 participants each were recruited in the intervention and control group. SDM-PLUS led to higher perceived involvement in decision-making (primary outcome, analysed patients n = 257, mean group difference 16.5, 95% CI 9.0–24.0, p = 0.002, adjusted for baseline differences: β 17.3, 95% CI 10.8–23.6, p = 0.0004). In addition, intervention group patients exhibited better therapeutic alliance, treatment satisfaction and self-rated medication compliance during inpatient stay. There were, however, no significant improvements in adherence and rehospitalisation rates in the 6- and 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations in patient recruitment, the SDM-PLUS trial has shown that the adoption of behavioural approaches (e.g. motivational interviewing) for SDM may yield a successful application to mental health. The authors recommend strategies to ensure effects are not lost at the interface between in- and outpatient treatment. Trial registration: The trial was registered at Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS00010880).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7303792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73037922020-06-26 Implementing shared decision-making on acute psychiatric wards: a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS) Hamann, J. Holzhüter, F. Blakaj, S. Becher, S. Haller, B. Landgrebe, M. Schmauß, M. Heres, S. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci Original Articles AIMS: Although shared decision-making (SDM) has the potential to improve health outcomes, psychiatrists often exclude patients with more severe mental illnesses or more acute conditions from participation in treatment decisions. This study examines whether SDM is facilitated by an approach which is specifically adapted to the needs of acutely ill patients (SDM-PLUS). METHODS: The study is a multi-centre, cluster-randomised, non-blinded, controlled trial of SDM-PLUS in 12 acute psychiatric wards of five psychiatric hospitals addressing inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. All patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were consecutively recruited for the trial at the time of their admission to the ward. Treatment teams of intervention wards were trained in the SDM-PLUS approach through participation in two half-day workshops. Patients on intervention wards received group training in SDM. Staff (and patients) of the control wards acted under ‘treatment as usual’ conditions. The primary outcome parameter was the patients' perceived involvement in decision-making at 3 weeks after study enrolment, analysed using a random-effects linear regression model. RESULTS: In total, 161 participants each were recruited in the intervention and control group. SDM-PLUS led to higher perceived involvement in decision-making (primary outcome, analysed patients n = 257, mean group difference 16.5, 95% CI 9.0–24.0, p = 0.002, adjusted for baseline differences: β 17.3, 95% CI 10.8–23.6, p = 0.0004). In addition, intervention group patients exhibited better therapeutic alliance, treatment satisfaction and self-rated medication compliance during inpatient stay. There were, however, no significant improvements in adherence and rehospitalisation rates in the 6- and 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Despite limitations in patient recruitment, the SDM-PLUS trial has shown that the adoption of behavioural approaches (e.g. motivational interviewing) for SDM may yield a successful application to mental health. The authors recommend strategies to ensure effects are not lost at the interface between in- and outpatient treatment. Trial registration: The trial was registered at Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS00010880). Cambridge University Press 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7303792/ /pubmed/32539907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796020000505 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Hamann, J.
Holzhüter, F.
Blakaj, S.
Becher, S.
Haller, B.
Landgrebe, M.
Schmauß, M.
Heres, S.
Implementing shared decision-making on acute psychiatric wards: a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS)
title Implementing shared decision-making on acute psychiatric wards: a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS)
title_full Implementing shared decision-making on acute psychiatric wards: a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS)
title_fullStr Implementing shared decision-making on acute psychiatric wards: a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS)
title_full_unstemmed Implementing shared decision-making on acute psychiatric wards: a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS)
title_short Implementing shared decision-making on acute psychiatric wards: a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (SDM-PLUS)
title_sort implementing shared decision-making on acute psychiatric wards: a cluster-randomized trial with inpatients suffering from schizophrenia (sdm-plus)
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7303792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32539907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796020000505
work_keys_str_mv AT hamannj implementingshareddecisionmakingonacutepsychiatricwardsaclusterrandomizedtrialwithinpatientssufferingfromschizophreniasdmplus
AT holzhuterf implementingshareddecisionmakingonacutepsychiatricwardsaclusterrandomizedtrialwithinpatientssufferingfromschizophreniasdmplus
AT blakajs implementingshareddecisionmakingonacutepsychiatricwardsaclusterrandomizedtrialwithinpatientssufferingfromschizophreniasdmplus
AT bechers implementingshareddecisionmakingonacutepsychiatricwardsaclusterrandomizedtrialwithinpatientssufferingfromschizophreniasdmplus
AT hallerb implementingshareddecisionmakingonacutepsychiatricwardsaclusterrandomizedtrialwithinpatientssufferingfromschizophreniasdmplus
AT landgrebem implementingshareddecisionmakingonacutepsychiatricwardsaclusterrandomizedtrialwithinpatientssufferingfromschizophreniasdmplus
AT schmaußm implementingshareddecisionmakingonacutepsychiatricwardsaclusterrandomizedtrialwithinpatientssufferingfromschizophreniasdmplus
AT heress implementingshareddecisionmakingonacutepsychiatricwardsaclusterrandomizedtrialwithinpatientssufferingfromschizophreniasdmplus