Cargando…

Independent Housing and Support for non-homeless individuals with severe mental illness: randomised controlled trial vs. observational study – study protocol

BACKGROUND: Social inclusion is essential for an adequate rehabilitation process for people with serious mental illness (SMI). Various supported housing settings aim to promote housing competencies and social inclusion in service users. Nevertheless, there is a strong preference in service users for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adamus, Christine, Mötteli, Sonja, Jäger, Matthias, Richter, Dirk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32560681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02712-y
_version_ 1783548213683290112
author Adamus, Christine
Mötteli, Sonja
Jäger, Matthias
Richter, Dirk
author_facet Adamus, Christine
Mötteli, Sonja
Jäger, Matthias
Richter, Dirk
author_sort Adamus, Christine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Social inclusion is essential for an adequate rehabilitation process for people with serious mental illness (SMI). Various supported housing settings aim to promote housing competencies and social inclusion in service users. Nevertheless, there is a strong preference in service users for independent living. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of Independent Housing and Support (IHS) compared to institutionalised residential care settings and other treatment as usual conditions (RCS/TAU) in two cities in Switzerland. METHODS: This is a prospective multi-centre, four-arm, non-inferiority cohort study investigating the effectiveness and efficiency of IHS and RCS/TAU for people with SMI. Effectiveness will be measured by a standardised measure of social inclusion as primary outcome as well as by measures of functioning and well-being. Efficiency will be analysed on the basis of service usage and costs associated with the different housing settings. Participants will be consecutively recruited and subsequently enrolled between April 2019 and December 2020 and assessed at baseline and after six, twelve and after 24 months. At one study site, 56 participants will be randomly assigned to one of the conditions; the other study site will be conducted as an observational study investigating 112 admitted participants. DISCUSSION: While the UN Convention of the Rights of People with Disabilities aims to promote the opportunity to choose one’s place of residence, the limited supply of alternative forms of housing does not guarantee genuine freedom of choice. Increased diversification and flexibility of housing support is essential. If IHS shows non-inferiority in terms of their effectiveness and efficiency, users should be allowed to choose their kind of housing support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03815604, December 04, 2019. 
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7304176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73041762020-06-22 Independent Housing and Support for non-homeless individuals with severe mental illness: randomised controlled trial vs. observational study – study protocol Adamus, Christine Mötteli, Sonja Jäger, Matthias Richter, Dirk BMC Psychiatry Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Social inclusion is essential for an adequate rehabilitation process for people with serious mental illness (SMI). Various supported housing settings aim to promote housing competencies and social inclusion in service users. Nevertheless, there is a strong preference in service users for independent living. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of Independent Housing and Support (IHS) compared to institutionalised residential care settings and other treatment as usual conditions (RCS/TAU) in two cities in Switzerland. METHODS: This is a prospective multi-centre, four-arm, non-inferiority cohort study investigating the effectiveness and efficiency of IHS and RCS/TAU for people with SMI. Effectiveness will be measured by a standardised measure of social inclusion as primary outcome as well as by measures of functioning and well-being. Efficiency will be analysed on the basis of service usage and costs associated with the different housing settings. Participants will be consecutively recruited and subsequently enrolled between April 2019 and December 2020 and assessed at baseline and after six, twelve and after 24 months. At one study site, 56 participants will be randomly assigned to one of the conditions; the other study site will be conducted as an observational study investigating 112 admitted participants. DISCUSSION: While the UN Convention of the Rights of People with Disabilities aims to promote the opportunity to choose one’s place of residence, the limited supply of alternative forms of housing does not guarantee genuine freedom of choice. Increased diversification and flexibility of housing support is essential. If IHS shows non-inferiority in terms of their effectiveness and efficiency, users should be allowed to choose their kind of housing support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03815604, December 04, 2019.  BioMed Central 2020-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7304176/ /pubmed/32560681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02712-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Adamus, Christine
Mötteli, Sonja
Jäger, Matthias
Richter, Dirk
Independent Housing and Support for non-homeless individuals with severe mental illness: randomised controlled trial vs. observational study – study protocol
title Independent Housing and Support for non-homeless individuals with severe mental illness: randomised controlled trial vs. observational study – study protocol
title_full Independent Housing and Support for non-homeless individuals with severe mental illness: randomised controlled trial vs. observational study – study protocol
title_fullStr Independent Housing and Support for non-homeless individuals with severe mental illness: randomised controlled trial vs. observational study – study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Independent Housing and Support for non-homeless individuals with severe mental illness: randomised controlled trial vs. observational study – study protocol
title_short Independent Housing and Support for non-homeless individuals with severe mental illness: randomised controlled trial vs. observational study – study protocol
title_sort independent housing and support for non-homeless individuals with severe mental illness: randomised controlled trial vs. observational study – study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32560681
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-020-02712-y
work_keys_str_mv AT adamuschristine independenthousingandsupportfornonhomelessindividualswithseverementalillnessrandomisedcontrolledtrialvsobservationalstudystudyprotocol
AT mottelisonja independenthousingandsupportfornonhomelessindividualswithseverementalillnessrandomisedcontrolledtrialvsobservationalstudystudyprotocol
AT jagermatthias independenthousingandsupportfornonhomelessindividualswithseverementalillnessrandomisedcontrolledtrialvsobservationalstudystudyprotocol
AT richterdirk independenthousingandsupportfornonhomelessindividualswithseverementalillnessrandomisedcontrolledtrialvsobservationalstudystudyprotocol