Cargando…
Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Using e-Health Interventions for Patients With Eating Disorders
BACKGROUND: In a world of technological advancements, electronic devices and services seem to be a promising way to increase patients’ engagement in treatment and to help manage their symptoms. Here, we identified and analyzed the current evidence of RCTs to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptabil...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595546 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00568 |
_version_ | 1783548237858209792 |
---|---|
author | Ahmadiankalati, Mojtaba Steins-Loeber, Sabine Paslakis, Georgios |
author_facet | Ahmadiankalati, Mojtaba Steins-Loeber, Sabine Paslakis, Georgios |
author_sort | Ahmadiankalati, Mojtaba |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In a world of technological advancements, electronic devices and services seem to be a promising way to increase patients’ engagement in treatment and to help manage their symptoms. Here, we identified and analyzed the current evidence of RCTs to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of e-health interventions in the eating disorder (ED) field. METHODS: We screened an initial cluster of 581 papers. In the end, 12 RCTs in clinical ED cohorts were included. RESULTS: Some studies were conceived as stand-alone interventions, while others were presented as add-ons to ED-specific treatments. Studies varied in the type of EDs under investigation and in the e-health intervention applied (with vs. without therapist support vs. blended interventions; smartphone- vs. web-based). Only four studies reported explicit acceptability measures. Out of those, two reported high acceptability, one reported low acceptability, and one reported no significant difference in acceptability between groups. Four studies reported higher effectiveness of the e-health intervention compared to the control condition, e.g., reduction in maladaptive eating behaviors. Regarding control groups, three used a wait list design and nine had another kind of intervention (e.g., face-to-face CBT, or treatment as usual) as control. DISCUSSION: So far, the evidence for acceptability and effectiveness of e-health interventions in EDs is very limited. There is also a lack of studies in older patients, adolescents, men, sexual and ethnic minorities. Shame/stigma is discussed in the context of e-health interventions for EDs. It remains unclear how severity of EDs affects the effectiveness of e-health interventions, how patients can channel the knowledge they acquire from e-health interventions into their actual behaviors, and how such interventions can better fit the needs of the individual patient to increase acceptability and effectiveness. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7304304 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73043042020-06-26 Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Using e-Health Interventions for Patients With Eating Disorders Ahmadiankalati, Mojtaba Steins-Loeber, Sabine Paslakis, Georgios Front Psychiatry Psychiatry BACKGROUND: In a world of technological advancements, electronic devices and services seem to be a promising way to increase patients’ engagement in treatment and to help manage their symptoms. Here, we identified and analyzed the current evidence of RCTs to evaluate the effectiveness and acceptability of e-health interventions in the eating disorder (ED) field. METHODS: We screened an initial cluster of 581 papers. In the end, 12 RCTs in clinical ED cohorts were included. RESULTS: Some studies were conceived as stand-alone interventions, while others were presented as add-ons to ED-specific treatments. Studies varied in the type of EDs under investigation and in the e-health intervention applied (with vs. without therapist support vs. blended interventions; smartphone- vs. web-based). Only four studies reported explicit acceptability measures. Out of those, two reported high acceptability, one reported low acceptability, and one reported no significant difference in acceptability between groups. Four studies reported higher effectiveness of the e-health intervention compared to the control condition, e.g., reduction in maladaptive eating behaviors. Regarding control groups, three used a wait list design and nine had another kind of intervention (e.g., face-to-face CBT, or treatment as usual) as control. DISCUSSION: So far, the evidence for acceptability and effectiveness of e-health interventions in EDs is very limited. There is also a lack of studies in older patients, adolescents, men, sexual and ethnic minorities. Shame/stigma is discussed in the context of e-health interventions for EDs. It remains unclear how severity of EDs affects the effectiveness of e-health interventions, how patients can channel the knowledge they acquire from e-health interventions into their actual behaviors, and how such interventions can better fit the needs of the individual patient to increase acceptability and effectiveness. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7304304/ /pubmed/32595546 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00568 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ahmadiankalati, Steins-Loeber and Paslakis http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Ahmadiankalati, Mojtaba Steins-Loeber, Sabine Paslakis, Georgios Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Using e-Health Interventions for Patients With Eating Disorders |
title | Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Using e-Health Interventions for Patients With Eating Disorders |
title_full | Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Using e-Health Interventions for Patients With Eating Disorders |
title_fullStr | Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Using e-Health Interventions for Patients With Eating Disorders |
title_full_unstemmed | Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Using e-Health Interventions for Patients With Eating Disorders |
title_short | Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Using e-Health Interventions for Patients With Eating Disorders |
title_sort | review of randomized controlled trials using e-health interventions for patients with eating disorders |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304304/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595546 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00568 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ahmadiankalatimojtaba reviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsusingehealthinterventionsforpatientswitheatingdisorders AT steinsloebersabine reviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsusingehealthinterventionsforpatientswitheatingdisorders AT paslakisgeorgios reviewofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsusingehealthinterventionsforpatientswitheatingdisorders |