Cargando…

Practices and Perspectives of Traditional Bone Setters in Northern Tanzania

BACKGROUND: Traditional health practitioners remain a critical source of care in Tanzania, more than 50% of Tanzanians frequently using their services. With a severe shortage of orthopaedic surgeons (1:3.3 million Tanzanians) traditional bone setters (TBSs) could potentially expand access to musculo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Card, Elizabeth B., Obayemi, Joy E., Shirima, Octavian, Lazaro, Matayo, Massawe, Honest, Stanifer, John W., Premkumar, Ajay, Sheth, Neil P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32587811
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2878
_version_ 1783548266575560704
author Card, Elizabeth B.
Obayemi, Joy E.
Shirima, Octavian
Lazaro, Matayo
Massawe, Honest
Stanifer, John W.
Premkumar, Ajay
Sheth, Neil P.
author_facet Card, Elizabeth B.
Obayemi, Joy E.
Shirima, Octavian
Lazaro, Matayo
Massawe, Honest
Stanifer, John W.
Premkumar, Ajay
Sheth, Neil P.
author_sort Card, Elizabeth B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Traditional health practitioners remain a critical source of care in Tanzania, more than 50% of Tanzanians frequently using their services. With a severe shortage of orthopaedic surgeons (1:3.3 million Tanzanians) traditional bone setters (TBSs) could potentially expand access to musculoskeletal care and improve outcomes for morbidity as a result of trauma. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the advantages and disadvantages of traditional bone setting in Tanzania and to assess potential for collaboration between TBSs and allopathic orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: Between June and July 2017 we interviewed six TBSs identified as key informants in the regions of Kilimanjaro, Arusha, and Manyara. We conducted semi-structured interviews about practices and perspectives on allopathic healthcare, and analyzed the data using a deductive framework method. FINDINGS: The TBSs reported that their patients were primarily recruited from their local communities via word-of-mouth communication networks. Payment methods for services included bundling costs, livestock barter, and sliding scale pricing. Potentially unsafe practices included lack of radiographic imaging to confirm reduction; cutting and puncturing of skin with unsterile tools; and rebreaking healed fractures. The TBSs described past experience collaborating with allopathic healthcare providers, referring patients to hospitals, and utilizing allopathic techniques in their practice. All expressed enthusiasm in future collaboration with allopathic hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: TBSs confer the advantages of word-of-mouth communication networks and greater financial and geographic accessibility. However, some of their practices raise concerns relating to infection, fracture malunion or nonunion, and iatrogenic trauma from manipulating previously healed fractures. A formal collaboration between TBSs and orthopaedic surgeons, based on respect and regular communication, could alleviate concerns through the development of care protocols and increase access to optimal orthopaedic care through a standardized triage and follow-up system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7304448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73044482020-06-24 Practices and Perspectives of Traditional Bone Setters in Northern Tanzania Card, Elizabeth B. Obayemi, Joy E. Shirima, Octavian Lazaro, Matayo Massawe, Honest Stanifer, John W. Premkumar, Ajay Sheth, Neil P. Ann Glob Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Traditional health practitioners remain a critical source of care in Tanzania, more than 50% of Tanzanians frequently using their services. With a severe shortage of orthopaedic surgeons (1:3.3 million Tanzanians) traditional bone setters (TBSs) could potentially expand access to musculoskeletal care and improve outcomes for morbidity as a result of trauma. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the advantages and disadvantages of traditional bone setting in Tanzania and to assess potential for collaboration between TBSs and allopathic orthopaedic surgeons. METHODS: Between June and July 2017 we interviewed six TBSs identified as key informants in the regions of Kilimanjaro, Arusha, and Manyara. We conducted semi-structured interviews about practices and perspectives on allopathic healthcare, and analyzed the data using a deductive framework method. FINDINGS: The TBSs reported that their patients were primarily recruited from their local communities via word-of-mouth communication networks. Payment methods for services included bundling costs, livestock barter, and sliding scale pricing. Potentially unsafe practices included lack of radiographic imaging to confirm reduction; cutting and puncturing of skin with unsterile tools; and rebreaking healed fractures. The TBSs described past experience collaborating with allopathic healthcare providers, referring patients to hospitals, and utilizing allopathic techniques in their practice. All expressed enthusiasm in future collaboration with allopathic hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: TBSs confer the advantages of word-of-mouth communication networks and greater financial and geographic accessibility. However, some of their practices raise concerns relating to infection, fracture malunion or nonunion, and iatrogenic trauma from manipulating previously healed fractures. A formal collaboration between TBSs and orthopaedic surgeons, based on respect and regular communication, could alleviate concerns through the development of care protocols and increase access to optimal orthopaedic care through a standardized triage and follow-up system. Ubiquity Press 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7304448/ /pubmed/32587811 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2878 Text en Copyright: © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Card, Elizabeth B.
Obayemi, Joy E.
Shirima, Octavian
Lazaro, Matayo
Massawe, Honest
Stanifer, John W.
Premkumar, Ajay
Sheth, Neil P.
Practices and Perspectives of Traditional Bone Setters in Northern Tanzania
title Practices and Perspectives of Traditional Bone Setters in Northern Tanzania
title_full Practices and Perspectives of Traditional Bone Setters in Northern Tanzania
title_fullStr Practices and Perspectives of Traditional Bone Setters in Northern Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Practices and Perspectives of Traditional Bone Setters in Northern Tanzania
title_short Practices and Perspectives of Traditional Bone Setters in Northern Tanzania
title_sort practices and perspectives of traditional bone setters in northern tanzania
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32587811
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2878
work_keys_str_mv AT cardelizabethb practicesandperspectivesoftraditionalbonesettersinnortherntanzania
AT obayemijoye practicesandperspectivesoftraditionalbonesettersinnortherntanzania
AT shirimaoctavian practicesandperspectivesoftraditionalbonesettersinnortherntanzania
AT lazaromatayo practicesandperspectivesoftraditionalbonesettersinnortherntanzania
AT massawehonest practicesandperspectivesoftraditionalbonesettersinnortherntanzania
AT staniferjohnw practicesandperspectivesoftraditionalbonesettersinnortherntanzania
AT premkumarajay practicesandperspectivesoftraditionalbonesettersinnortherntanzania
AT shethneilp practicesandperspectivesoftraditionalbonesettersinnortherntanzania