Cargando…

Pore-size and polymer affect the ability of filters for washing-machines to reduce domestic emissions of fibres to sewage

When clothes are worn and washed, they emit fibres into the ecosystem via discharges of sewage that have been linked to the global dispersion of clothing fibres. Facilities that treat sewage divert some fibres from sewage effluent to sludge, but no current methods of filtration eliminate their envir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Browne, Mark Anthony, Ros, Macarena, Johnston, Emma L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32559201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234248
_version_ 1783548279614603264
author Browne, Mark Anthony
Ros, Macarena
Johnston, Emma L.
author_facet Browne, Mark Anthony
Ros, Macarena
Johnston, Emma L.
author_sort Browne, Mark Anthony
collection PubMed
description When clothes are worn and washed, they emit fibres into the ecosystem via discharges of sewage that have been linked to the global dispersion of clothing fibres. Facilities that treat sewage divert some fibres from sewage effluent to sludge, but no current methods of filtration eliminate their environmental release. While filters for washing-machines are sold to consumers with the argument they will reduce the emissions of fibres from clothes to the environment, there is insufficient scientific peer-reviewed evidence assessing their ability to retain fibres from washed clothes and reduce environmental contamination. To improve our understanding and develop more realistic methods to assess the efficiency of filters, we washed replicate cotton and polyester garments in replicate domestic front-loaded washing-machines with and without replicate filters (micro- and milli-meter-sized pores), and then quantified the masses of the fibres retained by the filters and those released in the effluent. Here we show micrometer-sized filters significantly reduced the mass of cotton by 67% (F(2,6) = 11.69, P<0.01) compared to effluent from appliances with no filters, whilst filters in general reduced polyester fibres in their effluent by more than 65% (micrometer-sized pores) and 74% (millimeter-sized pores) compared to effluent from appliances with no filters (F(2,12) = 5.20, P<0.05). While filters with micrometer-sized pores caught larger masses and total proportions of fibres than filters with millimeter-sized pores, the differences were only significant for the total proportions of cotton (t = 4.799 df = 4, P<0.01). For tests with garments of either types of polymer, the filtered effluent still contained up to a third of the original masses of fibres released from the garments. Given the diversity of clothes, polymers, appliances and filters currently sold to consumers, our work shows the value of increasing the rigour (e.g. more levels of replication) when testing filters and the need for further studies that test an even greater diversity of materials and methods in order to meet the growing demand for knowledge from governments, industry and the public.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7304565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73045652020-06-19 Pore-size and polymer affect the ability of filters for washing-machines to reduce domestic emissions of fibres to sewage Browne, Mark Anthony Ros, Macarena Johnston, Emma L. PLoS One Research Article When clothes are worn and washed, they emit fibres into the ecosystem via discharges of sewage that have been linked to the global dispersion of clothing fibres. Facilities that treat sewage divert some fibres from sewage effluent to sludge, but no current methods of filtration eliminate their environmental release. While filters for washing-machines are sold to consumers with the argument they will reduce the emissions of fibres from clothes to the environment, there is insufficient scientific peer-reviewed evidence assessing their ability to retain fibres from washed clothes and reduce environmental contamination. To improve our understanding and develop more realistic methods to assess the efficiency of filters, we washed replicate cotton and polyester garments in replicate domestic front-loaded washing-machines with and without replicate filters (micro- and milli-meter-sized pores), and then quantified the masses of the fibres retained by the filters and those released in the effluent. Here we show micrometer-sized filters significantly reduced the mass of cotton by 67% (F(2,6) = 11.69, P<0.01) compared to effluent from appliances with no filters, whilst filters in general reduced polyester fibres in their effluent by more than 65% (micrometer-sized pores) and 74% (millimeter-sized pores) compared to effluent from appliances with no filters (F(2,12) = 5.20, P<0.05). While filters with micrometer-sized pores caught larger masses and total proportions of fibres than filters with millimeter-sized pores, the differences were only significant for the total proportions of cotton (t = 4.799 df = 4, P<0.01). For tests with garments of either types of polymer, the filtered effluent still contained up to a third of the original masses of fibres released from the garments. Given the diversity of clothes, polymers, appliances and filters currently sold to consumers, our work shows the value of increasing the rigour (e.g. more levels of replication) when testing filters and the need for further studies that test an even greater diversity of materials and methods in order to meet the growing demand for knowledge from governments, industry and the public. Public Library of Science 2020-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7304565/ /pubmed/32559201 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234248 Text en © 2020 Browne et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Browne, Mark Anthony
Ros, Macarena
Johnston, Emma L.
Pore-size and polymer affect the ability of filters for washing-machines to reduce domestic emissions of fibres to sewage
title Pore-size and polymer affect the ability of filters for washing-machines to reduce domestic emissions of fibres to sewage
title_full Pore-size and polymer affect the ability of filters for washing-machines to reduce domestic emissions of fibres to sewage
title_fullStr Pore-size and polymer affect the ability of filters for washing-machines to reduce domestic emissions of fibres to sewage
title_full_unstemmed Pore-size and polymer affect the ability of filters for washing-machines to reduce domestic emissions of fibres to sewage
title_short Pore-size and polymer affect the ability of filters for washing-machines to reduce domestic emissions of fibres to sewage
title_sort pore-size and polymer affect the ability of filters for washing-machines to reduce domestic emissions of fibres to sewage
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32559201
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234248
work_keys_str_mv AT brownemarkanthony poresizeandpolymeraffecttheabilityoffiltersforwashingmachinestoreducedomesticemissionsoffibrestosewage
AT rosmacarena poresizeandpolymeraffecttheabilityoffiltersforwashingmachinestoreducedomesticemissionsoffibrestosewage
AT johnstonemmal poresizeandpolymeraffecttheabilityoffiltersforwashingmachinestoreducedomesticemissionsoffibrestosewage