Cargando…

Housestaff perceptions on training and discussing the Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment Form (MOLST)

BACKGROUND: On-line tutorials are being increasingly used in medical education, including in teaching housestaff skills regarding end of life care. Recently an on-line tutorial incorporating interactive clinical vignettes and communication skills was used to prepare housestaff at Johns Hopkins Hospi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaeh, Sandra E., Hayes, Margaret M., Eakin, Michelle N., Rand, Cynthia S., Turnbull, Alison E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32559244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234973
_version_ 1783548280351752192
author Zaeh, Sandra E.
Hayes, Margaret M.
Eakin, Michelle N.
Rand, Cynthia S.
Turnbull, Alison E.
author_facet Zaeh, Sandra E.
Hayes, Margaret M.
Eakin, Michelle N.
Rand, Cynthia S.
Turnbull, Alison E.
author_sort Zaeh, Sandra E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: On-line tutorials are being increasingly used in medical education, including in teaching housestaff skills regarding end of life care. Recently an on-line tutorial incorporating interactive clinical vignettes and communication skills was used to prepare housestaff at Johns Hopkins Hospital to use the Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form, which documents patient preferences regarding end of life care. 40% of housestaff who viewed the module felt less than comfortable discussing choices on the MOLST with patients. We sought to understand factors beyond knowledge that contributed to housestaff discomfort in MOLST discussions despite successfully completing an on-line tutorial. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 18 housestaff who completed the on-line MOLST training module. Housestaff participants demonstrated good knowledge of legal and regulatory issues related to the MOLST compared to their peers, but reported feeling less than comfortable discussing the MOLST with patients. Transcripts of interviews were coded using thematic analysis to describe barriers to using the MOLST and suggestions for improving housestaff education about end of life care discussions. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis showed three major factors contributing to lack of housestaff comfort completing the MOLST form: [1] physician barriers to completion of the MOLST, [2] perceived patient barriers to completion of the MOLST, and [3] design characteristics of the MOLST form. Housestaff recommended a number of adaptations for improvement, including in-person training to improve their skills conducting conversations regarding end of life preferences with patients. CONCLUSIONS: Some housestaff who scored highly on knowledge tests after completing a formal on-line curriculum on the MOLST form reported barriers to using a mandated form despite receiving training. On-line modules may be insufficient for teaching communication skills to housestaff. Additional training opportunities including in-person training mechanisms should be incorporated into housestaff communication skills training related to end of life care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7304571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73045712020-06-19 Housestaff perceptions on training and discussing the Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment Form (MOLST) Zaeh, Sandra E. Hayes, Margaret M. Eakin, Michelle N. Rand, Cynthia S. Turnbull, Alison E. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: On-line tutorials are being increasingly used in medical education, including in teaching housestaff skills regarding end of life care. Recently an on-line tutorial incorporating interactive clinical vignettes and communication skills was used to prepare housestaff at Johns Hopkins Hospital to use the Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) form, which documents patient preferences regarding end of life care. 40% of housestaff who viewed the module felt less than comfortable discussing choices on the MOLST with patients. We sought to understand factors beyond knowledge that contributed to housestaff discomfort in MOLST discussions despite successfully completing an on-line tutorial. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with 18 housestaff who completed the on-line MOLST training module. Housestaff participants demonstrated good knowledge of legal and regulatory issues related to the MOLST compared to their peers, but reported feeling less than comfortable discussing the MOLST with patients. Transcripts of interviews were coded using thematic analysis to describe barriers to using the MOLST and suggestions for improving housestaff education about end of life care discussions. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis showed three major factors contributing to lack of housestaff comfort completing the MOLST form: [1] physician barriers to completion of the MOLST, [2] perceived patient barriers to completion of the MOLST, and [3] design characteristics of the MOLST form. Housestaff recommended a number of adaptations for improvement, including in-person training to improve their skills conducting conversations regarding end of life preferences with patients. CONCLUSIONS: Some housestaff who scored highly on knowledge tests after completing a formal on-line curriculum on the MOLST form reported barriers to using a mandated form despite receiving training. On-line modules may be insufficient for teaching communication skills to housestaff. Additional training opportunities including in-person training mechanisms should be incorporated into housestaff communication skills training related to end of life care. Public Library of Science 2020-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7304571/ /pubmed/32559244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234973 Text en © 2020 Zaeh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zaeh, Sandra E.
Hayes, Margaret M.
Eakin, Michelle N.
Rand, Cynthia S.
Turnbull, Alison E.
Housestaff perceptions on training and discussing the Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment Form (MOLST)
title Housestaff perceptions on training and discussing the Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment Form (MOLST)
title_full Housestaff perceptions on training and discussing the Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment Form (MOLST)
title_fullStr Housestaff perceptions on training and discussing the Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment Form (MOLST)
title_full_unstemmed Housestaff perceptions on training and discussing the Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment Form (MOLST)
title_short Housestaff perceptions on training and discussing the Maryland Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment Form (MOLST)
title_sort housestaff perceptions on training and discussing the maryland orders for life sustaining treatment form (molst)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32559244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234973
work_keys_str_mv AT zaehsandrae housestaffperceptionsontraininganddiscussingthemarylandordersforlifesustainingtreatmentformmolst
AT hayesmargaretm housestaffperceptionsontraininganddiscussingthemarylandordersforlifesustainingtreatmentformmolst
AT eakinmichellen housestaffperceptionsontraininganddiscussingthemarylandordersforlifesustainingtreatmentformmolst
AT randcynthias housestaffperceptionsontraininganddiscussingthemarylandordersforlifesustainingtreatmentformmolst
AT turnbullalisone housestaffperceptionsontraininganddiscussingthemarylandordersforlifesustainingtreatmentformmolst