Cargando…

A semi-structured questionnaire survey of laboratory animal rehoming practice across 41 UK animal research facilities

If a laboratory animal survives an experiment without lasting compromised welfare, its future must be negotiated. Rehoming may be a consideration. This paper reports on research findings that provide an indication of the uptake of animal rehoming by UK facilities and the associated moral, ethical, p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skidmore, Tess, Roe, Emma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32559221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234922
_version_ 1783548284910960640
author Skidmore, Tess
Roe, Emma
author_facet Skidmore, Tess
Roe, Emma
author_sort Skidmore, Tess
collection PubMed
description If a laboratory animal survives an experiment without lasting compromised welfare, its future must be negotiated. Rehoming may be a consideration. This paper reports on research findings that provide an indication of the uptake of animal rehoming by UK facilities and the associated moral, ethical, practical and regulatory considerations that inform decisions to rehome or not. This research addresses a widely acknowledged gap in the literature to understand both the numbers, and types of animals rehomed from UK research facilities, as well as the main motivations for engaging in the practice, and the barriers for those facilities not currently rehoming. From the ~160 UK research facilities in the UK, 41 facilities completed the questionnaire, giving a response rate of approximately 25%. Results suggest rehoming occurs routinely, yet the numbers are small; just 2322 animals are known to have been rehomed between 2015–2017. At least 1 in 10 facilities are rehoming. There exists a clear preference for the rehoming of some species (mainly cats, dogs and horses) over others (rodents, agricultural animals and primates). Indeed, although 94.15% of species kept in laboratories are rodents, they make up under a fifth (19.14%) of all animals known to be rehomed between 2015–2017. The primary motivation for rehoming is to boost staff morale and promote a positive ethical profile for the facility. Barriers include concern for the animal’s welfare following rehoming, high scientific demand for animals that leaves few to be rehomed, and, finally, certain animals (mainly those genetically modified) are simply unsuited to rehoming. The findings of this research will support facilities choosing to rehome, as well as those that are not currently engaging in the practice. By promoting the practice, the benefits to rehoming in terms of improving laboratory animal’s quality of life, helping facility staff to overcome the moral stress of killing, and addressing public concern regarding the fate of laboratory animals, can be attained. It is only once an understanding of rehoming from the perspective of UK research facilities has been ascertained, that appropriate policy and support can be provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7304590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73045902020-06-19 A semi-structured questionnaire survey of laboratory animal rehoming practice across 41 UK animal research facilities Skidmore, Tess Roe, Emma PLoS One Research Article If a laboratory animal survives an experiment without lasting compromised welfare, its future must be negotiated. Rehoming may be a consideration. This paper reports on research findings that provide an indication of the uptake of animal rehoming by UK facilities and the associated moral, ethical, practical and regulatory considerations that inform decisions to rehome or not. This research addresses a widely acknowledged gap in the literature to understand both the numbers, and types of animals rehomed from UK research facilities, as well as the main motivations for engaging in the practice, and the barriers for those facilities not currently rehoming. From the ~160 UK research facilities in the UK, 41 facilities completed the questionnaire, giving a response rate of approximately 25%. Results suggest rehoming occurs routinely, yet the numbers are small; just 2322 animals are known to have been rehomed between 2015–2017. At least 1 in 10 facilities are rehoming. There exists a clear preference for the rehoming of some species (mainly cats, dogs and horses) over others (rodents, agricultural animals and primates). Indeed, although 94.15% of species kept in laboratories are rodents, they make up under a fifth (19.14%) of all animals known to be rehomed between 2015–2017. The primary motivation for rehoming is to boost staff morale and promote a positive ethical profile for the facility. Barriers include concern for the animal’s welfare following rehoming, high scientific demand for animals that leaves few to be rehomed, and, finally, certain animals (mainly those genetically modified) are simply unsuited to rehoming. The findings of this research will support facilities choosing to rehome, as well as those that are not currently engaging in the practice. By promoting the practice, the benefits to rehoming in terms of improving laboratory animal’s quality of life, helping facility staff to overcome the moral stress of killing, and addressing public concern regarding the fate of laboratory animals, can be attained. It is only once an understanding of rehoming from the perspective of UK research facilities has been ascertained, that appropriate policy and support can be provided. Public Library of Science 2020-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7304590/ /pubmed/32559221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234922 Text en © 2020 Skidmore, Roe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Skidmore, Tess
Roe, Emma
A semi-structured questionnaire survey of laboratory animal rehoming practice across 41 UK animal research facilities
title A semi-structured questionnaire survey of laboratory animal rehoming practice across 41 UK animal research facilities
title_full A semi-structured questionnaire survey of laboratory animal rehoming practice across 41 UK animal research facilities
title_fullStr A semi-structured questionnaire survey of laboratory animal rehoming practice across 41 UK animal research facilities
title_full_unstemmed A semi-structured questionnaire survey of laboratory animal rehoming practice across 41 UK animal research facilities
title_short A semi-structured questionnaire survey of laboratory animal rehoming practice across 41 UK animal research facilities
title_sort semi-structured questionnaire survey of laboratory animal rehoming practice across 41 uk animal research facilities
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32559221
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234922
work_keys_str_mv AT skidmoretess asemistructuredquestionnairesurveyoflaboratoryanimalrehomingpracticeacross41ukanimalresearchfacilities
AT roeemma asemistructuredquestionnairesurveyoflaboratoryanimalrehomingpracticeacross41ukanimalresearchfacilities
AT skidmoretess semistructuredquestionnairesurveyoflaboratoryanimalrehomingpracticeacross41ukanimalresearchfacilities
AT roeemma semistructuredquestionnairesurveyoflaboratoryanimalrehomingpracticeacross41ukanimalresearchfacilities