Cargando…

Radial Basis Functions Mesh Morphing: A Comparison Between the Bi-harmonic Spline and the Wendland C2 Radial Function

Radial basis functions (RBFs) based mesh morphing allows to adapt the shape of a computational grid onto a new one by updating the position of all its nodes. Usually nodes on surfaces are used as sources to define the interpolation field that is propagated into the volume mesh by the RBF. The method...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biancolini, Marco Evangelos, Chiappa, Andrea, Cella, Ubaldo, Costa, Emiliano, Groth, Corrado, Porziani, Stefano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304786/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50433-5_23
_version_ 1783548327725367296
author Biancolini, Marco Evangelos
Chiappa, Andrea
Cella, Ubaldo
Costa, Emiliano
Groth, Corrado
Porziani, Stefano
author_facet Biancolini, Marco Evangelos
Chiappa, Andrea
Cella, Ubaldo
Costa, Emiliano
Groth, Corrado
Porziani, Stefano
author_sort Biancolini, Marco Evangelos
collection PubMed
description Radial basis functions (RBFs) based mesh morphing allows to adapt the shape of a computational grid onto a new one by updating the position of all its nodes. Usually nodes on surfaces are used as sources to define the interpolation field that is propagated into the volume mesh by the RBF. The method comes with two distinctive advantages that makes it very flexible: it is mesh independent and it allows a node wise precision. There are however two major drawbacks: large data set management and excessive distortion of the morphed mesh that may occur. Two radial kernels are widely adopted to overtake such issues: the bi-harmonic spline (BHS) and the Wendland C2 (WC2). The BHS minimizes the mesh distortion but it is computational intense as a dense linear system has to be solved whilist the WC2 leads to a sparse system easier to solve but which can lack in smoothness. In this paper we compare these two radial kernels with a specific focus on mesh distortion. A detailed insight about RBF fields resulting from BHS and WC2 is first provided by inspecting the intensity and the distribution of the strain for a very simple shape: a square plate with a central circular hole. An aeronautical example, the ice formation onto the leading edge of a wing, is then exposed adopting an industrial software implementation based on the state of the art of RBF solvers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7304786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73047862020-06-22 Radial Basis Functions Mesh Morphing: A Comparison Between the Bi-harmonic Spline and the Wendland C2 Radial Function Biancolini, Marco Evangelos Chiappa, Andrea Cella, Ubaldo Costa, Emiliano Groth, Corrado Porziani, Stefano Computational Science – ICCS 2020 Article Radial basis functions (RBFs) based mesh morphing allows to adapt the shape of a computational grid onto a new one by updating the position of all its nodes. Usually nodes on surfaces are used as sources to define the interpolation field that is propagated into the volume mesh by the RBF. The method comes with two distinctive advantages that makes it very flexible: it is mesh independent and it allows a node wise precision. There are however two major drawbacks: large data set management and excessive distortion of the morphed mesh that may occur. Two radial kernels are widely adopted to overtake such issues: the bi-harmonic spline (BHS) and the Wendland C2 (WC2). The BHS minimizes the mesh distortion but it is computational intense as a dense linear system has to be solved whilist the WC2 leads to a sparse system easier to solve but which can lack in smoothness. In this paper we compare these two radial kernels with a specific focus on mesh distortion. A detailed insight about RBF fields resulting from BHS and WC2 is first provided by inspecting the intensity and the distribution of the strain for a very simple shape: a square plate with a central circular hole. An aeronautical example, the ice formation onto the leading edge of a wing, is then exposed adopting an industrial software implementation based on the state of the art of RBF solvers. 2020-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7304786/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50433-5_23 Text en © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Article
Biancolini, Marco Evangelos
Chiappa, Andrea
Cella, Ubaldo
Costa, Emiliano
Groth, Corrado
Porziani, Stefano
Radial Basis Functions Mesh Morphing: A Comparison Between the Bi-harmonic Spline and the Wendland C2 Radial Function
title Radial Basis Functions Mesh Morphing: A Comparison Between the Bi-harmonic Spline and the Wendland C2 Radial Function
title_full Radial Basis Functions Mesh Morphing: A Comparison Between the Bi-harmonic Spline and the Wendland C2 Radial Function
title_fullStr Radial Basis Functions Mesh Morphing: A Comparison Between the Bi-harmonic Spline and the Wendland C2 Radial Function
title_full_unstemmed Radial Basis Functions Mesh Morphing: A Comparison Between the Bi-harmonic Spline and the Wendland C2 Radial Function
title_short Radial Basis Functions Mesh Morphing: A Comparison Between the Bi-harmonic Spline and the Wendland C2 Radial Function
title_sort radial basis functions mesh morphing: a comparison between the bi-harmonic spline and the wendland c2 radial function
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304786/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50433-5_23
work_keys_str_mv AT biancolinimarcoevangelos radialbasisfunctionsmeshmorphingacomparisonbetweenthebiharmonicsplineandthewendlandc2radialfunction
AT chiappaandrea radialbasisfunctionsmeshmorphingacomparisonbetweenthebiharmonicsplineandthewendlandc2radialfunction
AT cellaubaldo radialbasisfunctionsmeshmorphingacomparisonbetweenthebiharmonicsplineandthewendlandc2radialfunction
AT costaemiliano radialbasisfunctionsmeshmorphingacomparisonbetweenthebiharmonicsplineandthewendlandc2radialfunction
AT grothcorrado radialbasisfunctionsmeshmorphingacomparisonbetweenthebiharmonicsplineandthewendlandc2radialfunction
AT porzianistefano radialbasisfunctionsmeshmorphingacomparisonbetweenthebiharmonicsplineandthewendlandc2radialfunction