Cargando…

Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial

INTRODUCTION: Women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix are at increased risk for preterm birth (PTB). Given the burden of prematurity and its attendant risks, the quest for effective interventions in twins has been an area of considerable research. Studies investigating the effectiveness of ce...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dang, Vinh Q, He, Yen TN, Pham, Ha NH, Trieu, Tuyen TT, Bui, Trung Q, Vuong, Nhu T, Nguyen, Loc MT, Nguyen, Diem TN, Le, Thanh V, Li, Wentao, Le, Cam H, Mol, Ben W, Vuong, Lan N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32554744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036587
_version_ 1783548336279650304
author Dang, Vinh Q
He, Yen TN
Pham, Ha NH
Trieu, Tuyen TT
Bui, Trung Q
Vuong, Nhu T
Nguyen, Loc MT
Nguyen, Diem TN
Le, Thanh V
Li, Wentao
Le, Cam H
Mol, Ben W
Vuong, Lan N
author_facet Dang, Vinh Q
He, Yen TN
Pham, Ha NH
Trieu, Tuyen TT
Bui, Trung Q
Vuong, Nhu T
Nguyen, Loc MT
Nguyen, Diem TN
Le, Thanh V
Li, Wentao
Le, Cam H
Mol, Ben W
Vuong, Lan N
author_sort Dang, Vinh Q
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix are at increased risk for preterm birth (PTB). Given the burden of prematurity and its attendant risks, the quest for effective interventions in twins has been an area of considerable research. Studies investigating the effectiveness of cervical cerclage, cervical pessary and vaginal progesterone in preventing PTB have yielded conflicting results. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of cervical pessary and cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone to prevent PTB in women with twin pregnancies and a cervical length (CL) ≤ 28 mm. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, randomised clinical trial will be conducted at My Duc Hospital and My Duc Phu Nhuan Hospital, Vietnam. Asymptomatic women with twin pregnancies and a CL ≤28 mm, measured at 16–22 weeks’ gestation, will be randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive a cerclage, pessary, cerclage plus progesterone or pessary plus progesterone. Primary outcome will be PTB <34 weeks. Secondary outcomes will be maternal and neonatal complications. We preplanned a subgroup analysis according to CL from all women after randomisation and divided into four quartiles. Analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. The rate of PTB <34 weeks’ gestation in women with twin pregnancies and a cervix ≤28 mm and treated with pessary in our previous study at My Duc Hospital was 24.2%. A sample size of 340 women will be required to show or refute that cervical cerclage decreases the rate of PTB <34 weeks by 50% compared with pessary (from 24.2% to 12.1%, α level 0.05, power 80%, 5% lost to follow-up and protocol deviation). This study is not to be powered to assess interactions between interventions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of My Duc Hospital and informed patient consent was obtained before study enrolment. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03863613 (date of registration: 4 March 2019).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7304826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73048262020-06-22 Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial Dang, Vinh Q He, Yen TN Pham, Ha NH Trieu, Tuyen TT Bui, Trung Q Vuong, Nhu T Nguyen, Loc MT Nguyen, Diem TN Le, Thanh V Li, Wentao Le, Cam H Mol, Ben W Vuong, Lan N BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology INTRODUCTION: Women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix are at increased risk for preterm birth (PTB). Given the burden of prematurity and its attendant risks, the quest for effective interventions in twins has been an area of considerable research. Studies investigating the effectiveness of cervical cerclage, cervical pessary and vaginal progesterone in preventing PTB have yielded conflicting results. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of cervical pessary and cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone to prevent PTB in women with twin pregnancies and a cervical length (CL) ≤ 28 mm. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, randomised clinical trial will be conducted at My Duc Hospital and My Duc Phu Nhuan Hospital, Vietnam. Asymptomatic women with twin pregnancies and a CL ≤28 mm, measured at 16–22 weeks’ gestation, will be randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive a cerclage, pessary, cerclage plus progesterone or pessary plus progesterone. Primary outcome will be PTB <34 weeks. Secondary outcomes will be maternal and neonatal complications. We preplanned a subgroup analysis according to CL from all women after randomisation and divided into four quartiles. Analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. The rate of PTB <34 weeks’ gestation in women with twin pregnancies and a cervix ≤28 mm and treated with pessary in our previous study at My Duc Hospital was 24.2%. A sample size of 340 women will be required to show or refute that cervical cerclage decreases the rate of PTB <34 weeks by 50% compared with pessary (from 24.2% to 12.1%, α level 0.05, power 80%, 5% lost to follow-up and protocol deviation). This study is not to be powered to assess interactions between interventions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of My Duc Hospital and informed patient consent was obtained before study enrolment. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03863613 (date of registration: 4 March 2019). BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7304826/ /pubmed/32554744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036587 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Dang, Vinh Q
He, Yen TN
Pham, Ha NH
Trieu, Tuyen TT
Bui, Trung Q
Vuong, Nhu T
Nguyen, Loc MT
Nguyen, Diem TN
Le, Thanh V
Li, Wentao
Le, Cam H
Mol, Ben W
Vuong, Lan N
Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial
title Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial
title_full Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial
title_short Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial
title_sort effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial
topic Obstetrics and Gynaecology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32554744
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036587
work_keys_str_mv AT dangvinhq effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT heyentn effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT phamhanh effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT trieutuyentt effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT buitrungq effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT vuongnhut effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT nguyenlocmt effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT nguyendiemtn effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT lethanhv effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT liwentao effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT lecamh effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT molbenw effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT vuonglann effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial