Cargando…
Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial
INTRODUCTION: Women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix are at increased risk for preterm birth (PTB). Given the burden of prematurity and its attendant risks, the quest for effective interventions in twins has been an area of considerable research. Studies investigating the effectiveness of ce...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32554744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036587 |
_version_ | 1783548336279650304 |
---|---|
author | Dang, Vinh Q He, Yen TN Pham, Ha NH Trieu, Tuyen TT Bui, Trung Q Vuong, Nhu T Nguyen, Loc MT Nguyen, Diem TN Le, Thanh V Li, Wentao Le, Cam H Mol, Ben W Vuong, Lan N |
author_facet | Dang, Vinh Q He, Yen TN Pham, Ha NH Trieu, Tuyen TT Bui, Trung Q Vuong, Nhu T Nguyen, Loc MT Nguyen, Diem TN Le, Thanh V Li, Wentao Le, Cam H Mol, Ben W Vuong, Lan N |
author_sort | Dang, Vinh Q |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix are at increased risk for preterm birth (PTB). Given the burden of prematurity and its attendant risks, the quest for effective interventions in twins has been an area of considerable research. Studies investigating the effectiveness of cervical cerclage, cervical pessary and vaginal progesterone in preventing PTB have yielded conflicting results. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of cervical pessary and cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone to prevent PTB in women with twin pregnancies and a cervical length (CL) ≤ 28 mm. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, randomised clinical trial will be conducted at My Duc Hospital and My Duc Phu Nhuan Hospital, Vietnam. Asymptomatic women with twin pregnancies and a CL ≤28 mm, measured at 16–22 weeks’ gestation, will be randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive a cerclage, pessary, cerclage plus progesterone or pessary plus progesterone. Primary outcome will be PTB <34 weeks. Secondary outcomes will be maternal and neonatal complications. We preplanned a subgroup analysis according to CL from all women after randomisation and divided into four quartiles. Analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. The rate of PTB <34 weeks’ gestation in women with twin pregnancies and a cervix ≤28 mm and treated with pessary in our previous study at My Duc Hospital was 24.2%. A sample size of 340 women will be required to show or refute that cervical cerclage decreases the rate of PTB <34 weeks by 50% compared with pessary (from 24.2% to 12.1%, α level 0.05, power 80%, 5% lost to follow-up and protocol deviation). This study is not to be powered to assess interactions between interventions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of My Duc Hospital and informed patient consent was obtained before study enrolment. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03863613 (date of registration: 4 March 2019). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7304826 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73048262020-06-22 Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial Dang, Vinh Q He, Yen TN Pham, Ha NH Trieu, Tuyen TT Bui, Trung Q Vuong, Nhu T Nguyen, Loc MT Nguyen, Diem TN Le, Thanh V Li, Wentao Le, Cam H Mol, Ben W Vuong, Lan N BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology INTRODUCTION: Women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix are at increased risk for preterm birth (PTB). Given the burden of prematurity and its attendant risks, the quest for effective interventions in twins has been an area of considerable research. Studies investigating the effectiveness of cervical cerclage, cervical pessary and vaginal progesterone in preventing PTB have yielded conflicting results. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of cervical pessary and cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone to prevent PTB in women with twin pregnancies and a cervical length (CL) ≤ 28 mm. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, randomised clinical trial will be conducted at My Duc Hospital and My Duc Phu Nhuan Hospital, Vietnam. Asymptomatic women with twin pregnancies and a CL ≤28 mm, measured at 16–22 weeks’ gestation, will be randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive a cerclage, pessary, cerclage plus progesterone or pessary plus progesterone. Primary outcome will be PTB <34 weeks. Secondary outcomes will be maternal and neonatal complications. We preplanned a subgroup analysis according to CL from all women after randomisation and divided into four quartiles. Analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. The rate of PTB <34 weeks’ gestation in women with twin pregnancies and a cervix ≤28 mm and treated with pessary in our previous study at My Duc Hospital was 24.2%. A sample size of 340 women will be required to show or refute that cervical cerclage decreases the rate of PTB <34 weeks by 50% compared with pessary (from 24.2% to 12.1%, α level 0.05, power 80%, 5% lost to follow-up and protocol deviation). This study is not to be powered to assess interactions between interventions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee of My Duc Hospital and informed patient consent was obtained before study enrolment. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03863613 (date of registration: 4 March 2019). BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7304826/ /pubmed/32554744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036587 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Dang, Vinh Q He, Yen TN Pham, Ha NH Trieu, Tuyen TT Bui, Trung Q Vuong, Nhu T Nguyen, Loc MT Nguyen, Diem TN Le, Thanh V Li, Wentao Le, Cam H Mol, Ben W Vuong, Lan N Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial |
title | Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial |
title_full | Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial |
title_short | Effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial |
title_sort | effectiveness of cervical pessary compared to cervical cerclage with or without vaginal progesterone for the prevention of preterm birth in women with twin pregnancies and a short cervix: study protocol for a two-by-two factorial randomised clinical trial |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304826/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32554744 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036587 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dangvinhq effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial AT heyentn effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial AT phamhanh effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial AT trieutuyentt effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial AT buitrungq effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial AT vuongnhut effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial AT nguyenlocmt effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial AT nguyendiemtn effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial AT lethanhv effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial AT liwentao effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial AT lecamh effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial AT molbenw effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial AT vuonglann effectivenessofcervicalpessarycomparedtocervicalcerclagewithorwithoutvaginalprogesteroneforthepreventionofpretermbirthinwomenwithtwinpregnanciesandashortcervixstudyprotocolforatwobytwofactorialrandomisedclinicaltrial |