Cargando…

Cognition-Oriented Treatments for Older Adults: a Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews

Cognition-oriented treatments – commonly categorized as cognitive training, cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive stimulation – are promising approaches for the prevention of cognitive and functional decline in older adults. We conducted a systematic overview of meta-analyses investigating the effi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gavelin, Hanna Malmberg, Lampit, Amit, Hallock, Harry, Sabatés, Julieta, Bahar-Fuchs, Alex
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7305099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32266520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-020-09434-8
_version_ 1783548387178577920
author Gavelin, Hanna Malmberg
Lampit, Amit
Hallock, Harry
Sabatés, Julieta
Bahar-Fuchs, Alex
author_facet Gavelin, Hanna Malmberg
Lampit, Amit
Hallock, Harry
Sabatés, Julieta
Bahar-Fuchs, Alex
author_sort Gavelin, Hanna Malmberg
collection PubMed
description Cognition-oriented treatments – commonly categorized as cognitive training, cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive stimulation – are promising approaches for the prevention of cognitive and functional decline in older adults. We conducted a systematic overview of meta-analyses investigating the efficacy of cognition-oriented treatments on cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes in older adults with or without cognitive impairment. Review quality was assessed by A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR). We identified 51 eligible reviews, 46 of which were included in the quantitative synthesis. The confidence ratings were “moderate” for 9 (20%), “low” for 13 (28%) and “critically low” for 24 (52%) of the 46 reviews. While most reviews provided pooled effect estimates for objective cognition, non-cognitive outcomes of potential relevance were more sparsely reported. The mean effect estimate on cognition was small for cognitive training in healthy older adults (mean Hedges’ g = 0.32, range 0.13–0.64, 19 reviews), mild cognitive impairment (mean Hedges’ g = 0.40, range 0.32–0.60, five reviews), and dementia (mean Hedges’ g = 0.38, range 0.09–1.16, seven reviews), and small for cognitive stimulation in dementia (mean Hedges’ g = 0.36, range 0.26–0.44, five reviews). Meta-regression revealed that higher AMSTAR score was associated with larger effect estimates for cognitive outcomes. The available evidence supports the efficacy of cognition-oriented treatments improving cognitive performance in older adults. The extent to which such effects are of clinical value remains unclear, due to the scarcity of high-quality evidence and heterogeneity in reported findings. An important avenue for future trials is to include relevant non-cognitive outcomes in a more consistent way and, for meta-analyses in the field, there is a need for better adherence to methodological standards. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018084490. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11065-020-09434-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7305099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73050992020-06-22 Cognition-Oriented Treatments for Older Adults: a Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews Gavelin, Hanna Malmberg Lampit, Amit Hallock, Harry Sabatés, Julieta Bahar-Fuchs, Alex Neuropsychol Rev Review Cognition-oriented treatments – commonly categorized as cognitive training, cognitive rehabilitation and cognitive stimulation – are promising approaches for the prevention of cognitive and functional decline in older adults. We conducted a systematic overview of meta-analyses investigating the efficacy of cognition-oriented treatments on cognitive and non-cognitive outcomes in older adults with or without cognitive impairment. Review quality was assessed by A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR). We identified 51 eligible reviews, 46 of which were included in the quantitative synthesis. The confidence ratings were “moderate” for 9 (20%), “low” for 13 (28%) and “critically low” for 24 (52%) of the 46 reviews. While most reviews provided pooled effect estimates for objective cognition, non-cognitive outcomes of potential relevance were more sparsely reported. The mean effect estimate on cognition was small for cognitive training in healthy older adults (mean Hedges’ g = 0.32, range 0.13–0.64, 19 reviews), mild cognitive impairment (mean Hedges’ g = 0.40, range 0.32–0.60, five reviews), and dementia (mean Hedges’ g = 0.38, range 0.09–1.16, seven reviews), and small for cognitive stimulation in dementia (mean Hedges’ g = 0.36, range 0.26–0.44, five reviews). Meta-regression revealed that higher AMSTAR score was associated with larger effect estimates for cognitive outcomes. The available evidence supports the efficacy of cognition-oriented treatments improving cognitive performance in older adults. The extent to which such effects are of clinical value remains unclear, due to the scarcity of high-quality evidence and heterogeneity in reported findings. An important avenue for future trials is to include relevant non-cognitive outcomes in a more consistent way and, for meta-analyses in the field, there is a need for better adherence to methodological standards. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018084490. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11065-020-09434-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-04-07 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7305099/ /pubmed/32266520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-020-09434-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Gavelin, Hanna Malmberg
Lampit, Amit
Hallock, Harry
Sabatés, Julieta
Bahar-Fuchs, Alex
Cognition-Oriented Treatments for Older Adults: a Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews
title Cognition-Oriented Treatments for Older Adults: a Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews
title_full Cognition-Oriented Treatments for Older Adults: a Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews
title_fullStr Cognition-Oriented Treatments for Older Adults: a Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews
title_full_unstemmed Cognition-Oriented Treatments for Older Adults: a Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews
title_short Cognition-Oriented Treatments for Older Adults: a Systematic Overview of Systematic Reviews
title_sort cognition-oriented treatments for older adults: a systematic overview of systematic reviews
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7305099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32266520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-020-09434-8
work_keys_str_mv AT gavelinhannamalmberg cognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsasystematicoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT lampitamit cognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsasystematicoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT hallockharry cognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsasystematicoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT sabatesjulieta cognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsasystematicoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT baharfuchsalex cognitionorientedtreatmentsforolderadultsasystematicoverviewofsystematicreviews