Cargando…

Re-evaluation of the Dutch approach: are recently referred transgender youth different compared to earlier referrals?

The background of this article is to examine whether consecutively transgender clinic-referred adolescents between 2000 and 2016 differ over time in demographic, psychological, diagnostic, and treatment characteristics. The sample under study consisted of 1072 adolescents (404 assigned males, 668 as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arnoldussen, Marijn, Steensma, Thomas D., Popma, Arne, van der Miesen, Anna I. R., Twisk, Jos W. R., de Vries, Annelou L. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7305255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31473831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01394-6
_version_ 1783548423238057984
author Arnoldussen, Marijn
Steensma, Thomas D.
Popma, Arne
van der Miesen, Anna I. R.
Twisk, Jos W. R.
de Vries, Annelou L. C.
author_facet Arnoldussen, Marijn
Steensma, Thomas D.
Popma, Arne
van der Miesen, Anna I. R.
Twisk, Jos W. R.
de Vries, Annelou L. C.
author_sort Arnoldussen, Marijn
collection PubMed
description The background of this article is to examine whether consecutively transgender clinic-referred adolescents between 2000 and 2016 differ over time in demographic, psychological, diagnostic, and treatment characteristics. The sample under study consisted of 1072 adolescents (404 assigned males, 668 assigned females, mean age 14.6 years, and range 10.1–18.1 years). The data regarding the demographic, diagnostic, and treatment characteristics were collected from the adolescents’ files. Psychological functioning was measured by the Child Behaviour Check List and the Youth Self-Report, intensity of gender dysphoria by the Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale. Time trend analyses were performed with 2016 as reference year. Apart from a shift in sex ratio in favour of assigned females, no time trends were observed in demographics and intensity of dysphoria. It was found, however, that the psychological functioning improved somewhat over time (CBCL β − 0.396, p < 0.001, 95% CI − 0.553 to − 0.240, YSR β − 0.278, p < 0.001, 95% CI − 0.434 to − 0.122). The percentage of referrals diagnosed with gender dysphoria (mean 84.6%, range 75–97.4%) remained the same. The percentage of diagnosed adolescents that started with affirmative medical treatment (puberty suppression and/or gender-affirming hormones) did not change over time (mean 77.7%; range 53.8–94.9%). These findings suggest that the recently observed exponential increase in referrals might reflect that seeking help for gender dysphoria has become more common rather than that adolescents are referred to gender identity services with lower intensities of gender dysphoria or more psychological difficulties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7305255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73052552020-06-22 Re-evaluation of the Dutch approach: are recently referred transgender youth different compared to earlier referrals? Arnoldussen, Marijn Steensma, Thomas D. Popma, Arne van der Miesen, Anna I. R. Twisk, Jos W. R. de Vries, Annelou L. C. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Original Contribution The background of this article is to examine whether consecutively transgender clinic-referred adolescents between 2000 and 2016 differ over time in demographic, psychological, diagnostic, and treatment characteristics. The sample under study consisted of 1072 adolescents (404 assigned males, 668 assigned females, mean age 14.6 years, and range 10.1–18.1 years). The data regarding the demographic, diagnostic, and treatment characteristics were collected from the adolescents’ files. Psychological functioning was measured by the Child Behaviour Check List and the Youth Self-Report, intensity of gender dysphoria by the Utrecht Gender Dysphoria Scale. Time trend analyses were performed with 2016 as reference year. Apart from a shift in sex ratio in favour of assigned females, no time trends were observed in demographics and intensity of dysphoria. It was found, however, that the psychological functioning improved somewhat over time (CBCL β − 0.396, p < 0.001, 95% CI − 0.553 to − 0.240, YSR β − 0.278, p < 0.001, 95% CI − 0.434 to − 0.122). The percentage of referrals diagnosed with gender dysphoria (mean 84.6%, range 75–97.4%) remained the same. The percentage of diagnosed adolescents that started with affirmative medical treatment (puberty suppression and/or gender-affirming hormones) did not change over time (mean 77.7%; range 53.8–94.9%). These findings suggest that the recently observed exponential increase in referrals might reflect that seeking help for gender dysphoria has become more common rather than that adolescents are referred to gender identity services with lower intensities of gender dysphoria or more psychological difficulties. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-08-31 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7305255/ /pubmed/31473831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01394-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Arnoldussen, Marijn
Steensma, Thomas D.
Popma, Arne
van der Miesen, Anna I. R.
Twisk, Jos W. R.
de Vries, Annelou L. C.
Re-evaluation of the Dutch approach: are recently referred transgender youth different compared to earlier referrals?
title Re-evaluation of the Dutch approach: are recently referred transgender youth different compared to earlier referrals?
title_full Re-evaluation of the Dutch approach: are recently referred transgender youth different compared to earlier referrals?
title_fullStr Re-evaluation of the Dutch approach: are recently referred transgender youth different compared to earlier referrals?
title_full_unstemmed Re-evaluation of the Dutch approach: are recently referred transgender youth different compared to earlier referrals?
title_short Re-evaluation of the Dutch approach: are recently referred transgender youth different compared to earlier referrals?
title_sort re-evaluation of the dutch approach: are recently referred transgender youth different compared to earlier referrals?
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7305255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31473831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01394-6
work_keys_str_mv AT arnoldussenmarijn reevaluationofthedutchapproacharerecentlyreferredtransgenderyouthdifferentcomparedtoearlierreferrals
AT steensmathomasd reevaluationofthedutchapproacharerecentlyreferredtransgenderyouthdifferentcomparedtoearlierreferrals
AT popmaarne reevaluationofthedutchapproacharerecentlyreferredtransgenderyouthdifferentcomparedtoearlierreferrals
AT vandermiesenannair reevaluationofthedutchapproacharerecentlyreferredtransgenderyouthdifferentcomparedtoearlierreferrals
AT twiskjoswr reevaluationofthedutchapproacharerecentlyreferredtransgenderyouthdifferentcomparedtoearlierreferrals
AT devriesanneloulc reevaluationofthedutchapproacharerecentlyreferredtransgenderyouthdifferentcomparedtoearlierreferrals