Cargando…

Effectiveness of a brief psychotherapeutic intervention compared with treatment as usual for adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial

Although nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a clinically significant behavior, evidence-based, specific, time-, and cost-effective treatment approaches are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of a brief cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy manual, the Cutting Down Programme (CD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaess, Michael, Edinger, Alexandra, Fischer-Waldschmidt, Gloria, Parzer, Peter, Brunner, Romuald, Resch, Franz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7305262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31512050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01399-1
_version_ 1783548425011200000
author Kaess, Michael
Edinger, Alexandra
Fischer-Waldschmidt, Gloria
Parzer, Peter
Brunner, Romuald
Resch, Franz
author_facet Kaess, Michael
Edinger, Alexandra
Fischer-Waldschmidt, Gloria
Parzer, Peter
Brunner, Romuald
Resch, Franz
author_sort Kaess, Michael
collection PubMed
description Although nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a clinically significant behavior, evidence-based, specific, time-, and cost-effective treatment approaches are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of a brief cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy manual, the Cutting Down Programme (CDP), and treatment as usual (TAU) in the treatment of adolescent NSSI. We conducted a single-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT). Eligible participants were aged 12–17 years engaging in repetitive NSSI (at least 5 times within the past 6 months). We randomly allocated 74 participants to CDP (n = 37) or TAU (n = 37; in a 1:1 ratio). Outcome measures were administered before treatment (T0), directly after CDP or 4 months after baseline evaluation in the TAU group (T1), and another 6 months later (T2; primary endpoint). Primary outcome was a 50% reduction in NSSI frequency within the past 6 months at 10-month follow-up (T2). Regarding the primary outcome, there were no significant differences between the CDP (n = 26; 70.3%) and TAU group [n = 27; 73.0%; χ(2)(1) = 0.07; p = 0.797]; NSSI frequency within the past 6 months was significantly reduced at T2 [χ(2)(1) = 12.45; p < 0.001] with no between-group difference [χ(2)(1) = 0.14; p = 0.704]. However, we found a significant group x point of measurement interaction [χ(2)(2) = 7.78; p = 0.021] regarding NSSI within the last month indicating at T1. CDP was equally effective and achieved faster recovery compared to a significantly more intensive TAU in treating adolescent NSSI. The CDP could provide a brief and pragmatic first treatment within a stepped-care model for NSSI in routine clinical care. Clinical Trial Registration The trial was prospectively registered in the German Registry of Clinical Trials (https://www.drks.de; DRKS00003605) and is now complete. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00787-019-01399-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7305262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73052622020-06-22 Effectiveness of a brief psychotherapeutic intervention compared with treatment as usual for adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial Kaess, Michael Edinger, Alexandra Fischer-Waldschmidt, Gloria Parzer, Peter Brunner, Romuald Resch, Franz Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Original Contribution Although nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a clinically significant behavior, evidence-based, specific, time-, and cost-effective treatment approaches are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of a brief cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy manual, the Cutting Down Programme (CDP), and treatment as usual (TAU) in the treatment of adolescent NSSI. We conducted a single-centre randomised controlled trial (RCT). Eligible participants were aged 12–17 years engaging in repetitive NSSI (at least 5 times within the past 6 months). We randomly allocated 74 participants to CDP (n = 37) or TAU (n = 37; in a 1:1 ratio). Outcome measures were administered before treatment (T0), directly after CDP or 4 months after baseline evaluation in the TAU group (T1), and another 6 months later (T2; primary endpoint). Primary outcome was a 50% reduction in NSSI frequency within the past 6 months at 10-month follow-up (T2). Regarding the primary outcome, there were no significant differences between the CDP (n = 26; 70.3%) and TAU group [n = 27; 73.0%; χ(2)(1) = 0.07; p = 0.797]; NSSI frequency within the past 6 months was significantly reduced at T2 [χ(2)(1) = 12.45; p < 0.001] with no between-group difference [χ(2)(1) = 0.14; p = 0.704]. However, we found a significant group x point of measurement interaction [χ(2)(2) = 7.78; p = 0.021] regarding NSSI within the last month indicating at T1. CDP was equally effective and achieved faster recovery compared to a significantly more intensive TAU in treating adolescent NSSI. The CDP could provide a brief and pragmatic first treatment within a stepped-care model for NSSI in routine clinical care. Clinical Trial Registration The trial was prospectively registered in the German Registry of Clinical Trials (https://www.drks.de; DRKS00003605) and is now complete. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00787-019-01399-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-09-11 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7305262/ /pubmed/31512050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01399-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Kaess, Michael
Edinger, Alexandra
Fischer-Waldschmidt, Gloria
Parzer, Peter
Brunner, Romuald
Resch, Franz
Effectiveness of a brief psychotherapeutic intervention compared with treatment as usual for adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial
title Effectiveness of a brief psychotherapeutic intervention compared with treatment as usual for adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of a brief psychotherapeutic intervention compared with treatment as usual for adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a brief psychotherapeutic intervention compared with treatment as usual for adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a brief psychotherapeutic intervention compared with treatment as usual for adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial
title_short Effectiveness of a brief psychotherapeutic intervention compared with treatment as usual for adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial
title_sort effectiveness of a brief psychotherapeutic intervention compared with treatment as usual for adolescent nonsuicidal self-injury: a single-centre, randomised controlled trial
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7305262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31512050
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00787-019-01399-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kaessmichael effectivenessofabriefpsychotherapeuticinterventioncomparedwithtreatmentasusualforadolescentnonsuicidalselfinjuryasinglecentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT edingeralexandra effectivenessofabriefpsychotherapeuticinterventioncomparedwithtreatmentasusualforadolescentnonsuicidalselfinjuryasinglecentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fischerwaldschmidtgloria effectivenessofabriefpsychotherapeuticinterventioncomparedwithtreatmentasusualforadolescentnonsuicidalselfinjuryasinglecentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT parzerpeter effectivenessofabriefpsychotherapeuticinterventioncomparedwithtreatmentasusualforadolescentnonsuicidalselfinjuryasinglecentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT brunnerromuald effectivenessofabriefpsychotherapeuticinterventioncomparedwithtreatmentasusualforadolescentnonsuicidalselfinjuryasinglecentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT reschfranz effectivenessofabriefpsychotherapeuticinterventioncomparedwithtreatmentasusualforadolescentnonsuicidalselfinjuryasinglecentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial