Cargando…

Tocilizumab for treatment of patients with severe COVID–19: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab was approved for chimeric antigen receptor T–cell therapy induced cytokine release syndrome and it may provide clinical benefit for selected COVID–19 patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed hypoxic COVID–19 patients who were consecutively admitted b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kewan, Tariq, Covut, Fahrettin, Al–Jaghbeer, Mohammed J., Rose, Lori, Gopalakrishna, K.V., Akbik, Bassel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7305505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32766537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100418
_version_ 1783548475559903232
author Kewan, Tariq
Covut, Fahrettin
Al–Jaghbeer, Mohammed J.
Rose, Lori
Gopalakrishna, K.V.
Akbik, Bassel
author_facet Kewan, Tariq
Covut, Fahrettin
Al–Jaghbeer, Mohammed J.
Rose, Lori
Gopalakrishna, K.V.
Akbik, Bassel
author_sort Kewan, Tariq
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab was approved for chimeric antigen receptor T–cell therapy induced cytokine release syndrome and it may provide clinical benefit for selected COVID–19 patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed hypoxic COVID–19 patients who were consecutively admitted between March 13, 2020 and April 19, 2020. Patients with lung infiltrates and elevated inflammatory markers received a single dose of tocilizumab if no contraindication was present. Systemic steroid, hydroxychloroquine, and azithromycin were concomitantly used for majority of the patients. FINDINGS: Of the 51 patients included for analysis, 28 (55%) received tocilizumab and 23 (45%) did not receive tocilizumab. Tocilizumab cohort required more invasive ventilation (68% vs. 22%) at baseline and during entire hospitalization (75% vs. 48%). The median time to clinical improvement in tocilizumab vs. no tocilizumab cohorts was 8 days (Interquartile range [IQR]: 6·25 – 9·75 days) vs. 13 days (IQR: 9·75 – 15·25 days) among patients who required mechanical ventilation at any time (Hazard ratio for clinical improvement: 1·83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0·57 – 5·84) and 6·5 days vs. 7 days among all patients (Hazard ratio for clinical improvement: 1·14, 95% CI: 0·55 – 2·38), respectively. The median duration of vasopressor support and invasive mechanical ventilation were 2 days (IQR: 1·75 – 4·25 days) vs. 5 days (IQR: 4 – 8 days), p = 0.039, and 7 days (IQR: 4 – 14 days) vs. 10 days (IQR: 5 – 15 days) in tocilizumab vs. no tocilizumab cohorts, p = 0.11, respectively. Similar rates of hospital–acquired infections occurred in both cohorts (18% in tocilizumab and 22% in no tocilizumab cohort). INTERPRETATION: In patients with severe COVID-19, tocilizumab was associated with significantly shorter duration of vasopressor support. Although not statistically significant, tocilizumab also resulted in shorter median time to clinical improvement and shorter duration of invasive ventilation. These findings require validation from ongoing clinical trials of Tocilizumab in COVID–19 patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7305505
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73055052020-06-22 Tocilizumab for treatment of patients with severe COVID–19: A retrospective cohort study Kewan, Tariq Covut, Fahrettin Al–Jaghbeer, Mohammed J. Rose, Lori Gopalakrishna, K.V. Akbik, Bassel EClinicalMedicine Research paper BACKGROUND: Tocilizumab was approved for chimeric antigen receptor T–cell therapy induced cytokine release syndrome and it may provide clinical benefit for selected COVID–19 patients. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed hypoxic COVID–19 patients who were consecutively admitted between March 13, 2020 and April 19, 2020. Patients with lung infiltrates and elevated inflammatory markers received a single dose of tocilizumab if no contraindication was present. Systemic steroid, hydroxychloroquine, and azithromycin were concomitantly used for majority of the patients. FINDINGS: Of the 51 patients included for analysis, 28 (55%) received tocilizumab and 23 (45%) did not receive tocilizumab. Tocilizumab cohort required more invasive ventilation (68% vs. 22%) at baseline and during entire hospitalization (75% vs. 48%). The median time to clinical improvement in tocilizumab vs. no tocilizumab cohorts was 8 days (Interquartile range [IQR]: 6·25 – 9·75 days) vs. 13 days (IQR: 9·75 – 15·25 days) among patients who required mechanical ventilation at any time (Hazard ratio for clinical improvement: 1·83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0·57 – 5·84) and 6·5 days vs. 7 days among all patients (Hazard ratio for clinical improvement: 1·14, 95% CI: 0·55 – 2·38), respectively. The median duration of vasopressor support and invasive mechanical ventilation were 2 days (IQR: 1·75 – 4·25 days) vs. 5 days (IQR: 4 – 8 days), p = 0.039, and 7 days (IQR: 4 – 14 days) vs. 10 days (IQR: 5 – 15 days) in tocilizumab vs. no tocilizumab cohorts, p = 0.11, respectively. Similar rates of hospital–acquired infections occurred in both cohorts (18% in tocilizumab and 22% in no tocilizumab cohort). INTERPRETATION: In patients with severe COVID-19, tocilizumab was associated with significantly shorter duration of vasopressor support. Although not statistically significant, tocilizumab also resulted in shorter median time to clinical improvement and shorter duration of invasive ventilation. These findings require validation from ongoing clinical trials of Tocilizumab in COVID–19 patients. Elsevier 2020-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7305505/ /pubmed/32766537 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100418 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research paper
Kewan, Tariq
Covut, Fahrettin
Al–Jaghbeer, Mohammed J.
Rose, Lori
Gopalakrishna, K.V.
Akbik, Bassel
Tocilizumab for treatment of patients with severe COVID–19: A retrospective cohort study
title Tocilizumab for treatment of patients with severe COVID–19: A retrospective cohort study
title_full Tocilizumab for treatment of patients with severe COVID–19: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Tocilizumab for treatment of patients with severe COVID–19: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Tocilizumab for treatment of patients with severe COVID–19: A retrospective cohort study
title_short Tocilizumab for treatment of patients with severe COVID–19: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort tocilizumab for treatment of patients with severe covid–19: a retrospective cohort study
topic Research paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7305505/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32766537
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100418
work_keys_str_mv AT kewantariq tocilizumabfortreatmentofpatientswithseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy
AT covutfahrettin tocilizumabfortreatmentofpatientswithseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy
AT aljaghbeermohammedj tocilizumabfortreatmentofpatientswithseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy
AT roselori tocilizumabfortreatmentofpatientswithseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy
AT gopalakrishnakv tocilizumabfortreatmentofpatientswithseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy
AT akbikbassel tocilizumabfortreatmentofpatientswithseverecovid19aretrospectivecohortstudy