Cargando…

Impact of heat-inactivation on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody by ELISA

BACKGROUND: To establish a safe and accurate method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG, we assessed the impact of sera after heat-inactivation on the SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG levels measured by ELISA-immunoassay. METHODS: The serum samples of 62 patients with COVID-19 and 18 healthy controls were co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Xiumei, Zhang, Ruyi, An, Taixue, Li, Qiang, Situ, Bo, Ou, Zihao, Wu, Changmeng, Yang, Biao, Tian, Peifu, Hu, Yuhai, Ping, Baohong, Wang, Qian, Zheng, Lei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7305743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32569631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.06.032
_version_ 1783548528250847232
author Hu, Xiumei
Zhang, Ruyi
An, Taixue
Li, Qiang
Situ, Bo
Ou, Zihao
Wu, Changmeng
Yang, Biao
Tian, Peifu
Hu, Yuhai
Ping, Baohong
Wang, Qian
Zheng, Lei
author_facet Hu, Xiumei
Zhang, Ruyi
An, Taixue
Li, Qiang
Situ, Bo
Ou, Zihao
Wu, Changmeng
Yang, Biao
Tian, Peifu
Hu, Yuhai
Ping, Baohong
Wang, Qian
Zheng, Lei
author_sort Hu, Xiumei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To establish a safe and accurate method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG, we assessed the impact of sera after heat-inactivation on the SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG levels measured by ELISA-immunoassay. METHODS: The serum samples of 62 patients with COVID-19 and 18 healthy controls were collected in Hankou’s Hospital of Wuhan from February 27 to March 6, 2020. Before and after the samples were inactivated, the levels of IgM and IgG antibodies were measured. RESULTS: The indexes of antibodies after inactivated were significantly higher than those in fresh sera, while the positive rates in all participants or in patients with COVID-19 did not change. The positive coincidence rate, negative coincidence rate and total coincidence rate of IgM antibodies before and after inactivation were 100.00% (55/55), 96.00% (24/25) and 98.75% (79/80), respectively (κ = 0.971, P < 0.001), while those for IgG antibodies were 98.21% (55/56), 91.67% (22/24) and 98.75% (79/80) respectively (κ = 0.910, P < 0.001). These results showed a good consistency. CONCLUSIONS: Heating-activation does not decrease the diagnostic efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 IgM or IgG antibodies. Sera inactivated by heating at 56 °C for 30 min should be recommended to minimize the risk of virus contamination of laboratory staff.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7305743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73057432020-06-22 Impact of heat-inactivation on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody by ELISA Hu, Xiumei Zhang, Ruyi An, Taixue Li, Qiang Situ, Bo Ou, Zihao Wu, Changmeng Yang, Biao Tian, Peifu Hu, Yuhai Ping, Baohong Wang, Qian Zheng, Lei Clin Chim Acta Article BACKGROUND: To establish a safe and accurate method for detecting SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG, we assessed the impact of sera after heat-inactivation on the SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG levels measured by ELISA-immunoassay. METHODS: The serum samples of 62 patients with COVID-19 and 18 healthy controls were collected in Hankou’s Hospital of Wuhan from February 27 to March 6, 2020. Before and after the samples were inactivated, the levels of IgM and IgG antibodies were measured. RESULTS: The indexes of antibodies after inactivated were significantly higher than those in fresh sera, while the positive rates in all participants or in patients with COVID-19 did not change. The positive coincidence rate, negative coincidence rate and total coincidence rate of IgM antibodies before and after inactivation were 100.00% (55/55), 96.00% (24/25) and 98.75% (79/80), respectively (κ = 0.971, P < 0.001), while those for IgG antibodies were 98.21% (55/56), 91.67% (22/24) and 98.75% (79/80) respectively (κ = 0.910, P < 0.001). These results showed a good consistency. CONCLUSIONS: Heating-activation does not decrease the diagnostic efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 IgM or IgG antibodies. Sera inactivated by heating at 56 °C for 30 min should be recommended to minimize the risk of virus contamination of laboratory staff. Elsevier B.V. 2020-10 2020-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7305743/ /pubmed/32569631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.06.032 Text en © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Hu, Xiumei
Zhang, Ruyi
An, Taixue
Li, Qiang
Situ, Bo
Ou, Zihao
Wu, Changmeng
Yang, Biao
Tian, Peifu
Hu, Yuhai
Ping, Baohong
Wang, Qian
Zheng, Lei
Impact of heat-inactivation on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody by ELISA
title Impact of heat-inactivation on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody by ELISA
title_full Impact of heat-inactivation on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody by ELISA
title_fullStr Impact of heat-inactivation on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody by ELISA
title_full_unstemmed Impact of heat-inactivation on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody by ELISA
title_short Impact of heat-inactivation on the detection of SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG antibody by ELISA
title_sort impact of heat-inactivation on the detection of sars-cov-2 igm and igg antibody by elisa
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7305743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32569631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.06.032
work_keys_str_mv AT huxiumei impactofheatinactivationonthedetectionofsarscov2igmandiggantibodybyelisa
AT zhangruyi impactofheatinactivationonthedetectionofsarscov2igmandiggantibodybyelisa
AT antaixue impactofheatinactivationonthedetectionofsarscov2igmandiggantibodybyelisa
AT liqiang impactofheatinactivationonthedetectionofsarscov2igmandiggantibodybyelisa
AT situbo impactofheatinactivationonthedetectionofsarscov2igmandiggantibodybyelisa
AT ouzihao impactofheatinactivationonthedetectionofsarscov2igmandiggantibodybyelisa
AT wuchangmeng impactofheatinactivationonthedetectionofsarscov2igmandiggantibodybyelisa
AT yangbiao impactofheatinactivationonthedetectionofsarscov2igmandiggantibodybyelisa
AT tianpeifu impactofheatinactivationonthedetectionofsarscov2igmandiggantibodybyelisa
AT huyuhai impactofheatinactivationonthedetectionofsarscov2igmandiggantibodybyelisa
AT pingbaohong impactofheatinactivationonthedetectionofsarscov2igmandiggantibodybyelisa
AT wangqian impactofheatinactivationonthedetectionofsarscov2igmandiggantibodybyelisa
AT zhenglei impactofheatinactivationonthedetectionofsarscov2igmandiggantibodybyelisa