Cargando…
Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The use of synthetic mesh in transvaginal pelvic floor surgery has been subject to debate internationally. Although mesh erosion appears to be less associated with an abdominal approach, the long-term outcome has not been studied intensively. This study was set up to det...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31222568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03990-1 |
_version_ | 1783548577055768576 |
---|---|
author | van Zanten, Femke van Iersel, Jan J. Paulides, Tim J. C. Verheijen, Paul M. Broeders, Ivo A. M. J. Consten, Esther C. J. Lenters, Egbert Schraffordt Koops, Steven E. |
author_facet | van Zanten, Femke van Iersel, Jan J. Paulides, Tim J. C. Verheijen, Paul M. Broeders, Ivo A. M. J. Consten, Esther C. J. Lenters, Egbert Schraffordt Koops, Steven E. |
author_sort | van Zanten, Femke |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The use of synthetic mesh in transvaginal pelvic floor surgery has been subject to debate internationally. Although mesh erosion appears to be less associated with an abdominal approach, the long-term outcome has not been studied intensively. This study was set up to determine the long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal pelvic reconstructive surgery. METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort study was conducted in a tertiary care setting. All consecutive female patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and sacrocolporectopexy in 2011 and 2012 were included. Primary outcome was mesh erosion. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation (6 weeks, 1 year, 5 years) with a clinical examination and questionnaire regarding pelvic floor symptoms was performed. Mesh-related complications were assessed using a transparent vaginal speculum, proctoscopy, and digital vaginal and rectal examination. Kaplan–Meier estimates were calculated for mesh erosion. A review of the literature on mesh exposure after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy was performed (≥12 months’ follow-up). RESULTS: Ninety-six of the 130 patients included (73.8%) were clinically examined. Median follow-up time was 48.1 months (range 36.0–62.1). Three mesh erosions were diagnosed (3.1%; Kaplan–Meier 4.9%, 95% confidence interval 0–11.0): one bladder erosion for which mesh resection and an omental patch interposition were performed, and two asymptomatic vaginal erosions (at 42.7 and 42.3 months) treated with estrogen cream in one. Additionally, 22 patients responded solely by questionnaire and/or telephone; none reported mesh-related complaints. The literature, mostly based on retrospective studies, described a median mesh erosion rate of 1.9% (range 0–13.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term rate of mesh erosion following an abdominally placed synthetic graft is low. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-019-03990-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7306026 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73060262020-06-22 Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature van Zanten, Femke van Iersel, Jan J. Paulides, Tim J. C. Verheijen, Paul M. Broeders, Ivo A. M. J. Consten, Esther C. J. Lenters, Egbert Schraffordt Koops, Steven E. Int Urogynecol J Original Article INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The use of synthetic mesh in transvaginal pelvic floor surgery has been subject to debate internationally. Although mesh erosion appears to be less associated with an abdominal approach, the long-term outcome has not been studied intensively. This study was set up to determine the long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal pelvic reconstructive surgery. METHODS: A prospective, observational cohort study was conducted in a tertiary care setting. All consecutive female patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and sacrocolporectopexy in 2011 and 2012 were included. Primary outcome was mesh erosion. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation (6 weeks, 1 year, 5 years) with a clinical examination and questionnaire regarding pelvic floor symptoms was performed. Mesh-related complications were assessed using a transparent vaginal speculum, proctoscopy, and digital vaginal and rectal examination. Kaplan–Meier estimates were calculated for mesh erosion. A review of the literature on mesh exposure after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy was performed (≥12 months’ follow-up). RESULTS: Ninety-six of the 130 patients included (73.8%) were clinically examined. Median follow-up time was 48.1 months (range 36.0–62.1). Three mesh erosions were diagnosed (3.1%; Kaplan–Meier 4.9%, 95% confidence interval 0–11.0): one bladder erosion for which mesh resection and an omental patch interposition were performed, and two asymptomatic vaginal erosions (at 42.7 and 42.3 months) treated with estrogen cream in one. Additionally, 22 patients responded solely by questionnaire and/or telephone; none reported mesh-related complaints. The literature, mostly based on retrospective studies, described a median mesh erosion rate of 1.9% (range 0–13.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The long-term rate of mesh erosion following an abdominally placed synthetic graft is low. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00192-019-03990-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users Springer International Publishing 2019-06-20 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7306026/ /pubmed/31222568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03990-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article van Zanten, Femke van Iersel, Jan J. Paulides, Tim J. C. Verheijen, Paul M. Broeders, Ivo A. M. J. Consten, Esther C. J. Lenters, Egbert Schraffordt Koops, Steven E. Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature |
title | Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature |
title_full | Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature |
title_fullStr | Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature |
title_short | Long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature |
title_sort | long-term mesh erosion rate following abdominal robotic reconstructive pelvic floor surgery: a prospective study and overview of the literature |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306026/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31222568 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03990-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanzantenfemke longtermmesherosionratefollowingabdominalroboticreconstructivepelvicfloorsurgeryaprospectivestudyandoverviewoftheliterature AT vanierseljanj longtermmesherosionratefollowingabdominalroboticreconstructivepelvicfloorsurgeryaprospectivestudyandoverviewoftheliterature AT paulidestimjc longtermmesherosionratefollowingabdominalroboticreconstructivepelvicfloorsurgeryaprospectivestudyandoverviewoftheliterature AT verheijenpaulm longtermmesherosionratefollowingabdominalroboticreconstructivepelvicfloorsurgeryaprospectivestudyandoverviewoftheliterature AT broedersivoamj longtermmesherosionratefollowingabdominalroboticreconstructivepelvicfloorsurgeryaprospectivestudyandoverviewoftheliterature AT constenesthercj longtermmesherosionratefollowingabdominalroboticreconstructivepelvicfloorsurgeryaprospectivestudyandoverviewoftheliterature AT lentersegbert longtermmesherosionratefollowingabdominalroboticreconstructivepelvicfloorsurgeryaprospectivestudyandoverviewoftheliterature AT schraffordtkoopsstevene longtermmesherosionratefollowingabdominalroboticreconstructivepelvicfloorsurgeryaprospectivestudyandoverviewoftheliterature |