Cargando…
Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19
INTRODUCTION: Management of the COVID-19 pandemic is hampered by long delays associated with centralised laboratory PCR testing. In hospitals this leads to poor patient flow and nosocomial transmission and so rapid, accurate diagnostic tests are urgently required. The FebriDx is a point-of-care test...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32579983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.051 |
_version_ | 1783548595245416448 |
---|---|
author | Clark, Tristan W. Brendish, Nathan J Poole, Stephen Naidu, Vasanth V. Mansbridge, Christopher Norton, Nicholas Wheeler, Helen Presland, Laura Ewings, Sean |
author_facet | Clark, Tristan W. Brendish, Nathan J Poole, Stephen Naidu, Vasanth V. Mansbridge, Christopher Norton, Nicholas Wheeler, Helen Presland, Laura Ewings, Sean |
author_sort | Clark, Tristan W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Management of the COVID-19 pandemic is hampered by long delays associated with centralised laboratory PCR testing. In hospitals this leads to poor patient flow and nosocomial transmission and so rapid, accurate diagnostic tests are urgently required. The FebriDx is a point-of-care test that detects an antiviral host response protein in finger prick blood within 10 min, but its accuracy for the identification of COVID-19 is unknown. METHODS: We performed a real-world diagnostic accuracy study of FebriDx in hospitalised patients during the first wave of the pandemic. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated based on FebriDx results compared to the reference standard of SARS-CoV-2 PCR on combined nose and throat swabs. A multivariable predictive model including FebriDx, age, sex, and clinical characteristics was developed and underwent internal validation. RESULTS: FebriDx was performed on 251 patients and gave a valid result in 248. 118 of 248 (48%) were PCR positive for COVID-19. FebriDx results were available after 10 min compared with 1.7 (1.6 to 2.1) hours with point-of-care PCR testing and 23.4 (17.2 to 31.1) hours with laboratory PCR testing. Sensitivity of FebriDx for the identification of COVID-19 was 93% (110/118; 95% CI 87 to 97%) and specificity was 86% (112/130; 95%CI 79 to 92%). Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 6.73 (95%CI 4.37 to 10.37) and 0.08 (95%CI 0.04 to 0.15) respectively. In the multivariate model age, sex and other clinical features did not contribute significantly to the effect of the FebriDx result in distinguishing patients with and without COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: During the first wave of the pandemic, FebriDx had high accuracy for the identification of COVID-19 in hospitalised adults and could be deployed as a front door triage tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14966673 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7306108 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73061082020-06-22 Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19 Clark, Tristan W. Brendish, Nathan J Poole, Stephen Naidu, Vasanth V. Mansbridge, Christopher Norton, Nicholas Wheeler, Helen Presland, Laura Ewings, Sean J Infect Article INTRODUCTION: Management of the COVID-19 pandemic is hampered by long delays associated with centralised laboratory PCR testing. In hospitals this leads to poor patient flow and nosocomial transmission and so rapid, accurate diagnostic tests are urgently required. The FebriDx is a point-of-care test that detects an antiviral host response protein in finger prick blood within 10 min, but its accuracy for the identification of COVID-19 is unknown. METHODS: We performed a real-world diagnostic accuracy study of FebriDx in hospitalised patients during the first wave of the pandemic. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated based on FebriDx results compared to the reference standard of SARS-CoV-2 PCR on combined nose and throat swabs. A multivariable predictive model including FebriDx, age, sex, and clinical characteristics was developed and underwent internal validation. RESULTS: FebriDx was performed on 251 patients and gave a valid result in 248. 118 of 248 (48%) were PCR positive for COVID-19. FebriDx results were available after 10 min compared with 1.7 (1.6 to 2.1) hours with point-of-care PCR testing and 23.4 (17.2 to 31.1) hours with laboratory PCR testing. Sensitivity of FebriDx for the identification of COVID-19 was 93% (110/118; 95% CI 87 to 97%) and specificity was 86% (112/130; 95%CI 79 to 92%). Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 6.73 (95%CI 4.37 to 10.37) and 0.08 (95%CI 0.04 to 0.15) respectively. In the multivariate model age, sex and other clinical features did not contribute significantly to the effect of the FebriDx result in distinguishing patients with and without COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: During the first wave of the pandemic, FebriDx had high accuracy for the identification of COVID-19 in hospitalised adults and could be deployed as a front door triage tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14966673 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2020-10 2020-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7306108/ /pubmed/32579983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.051 Text en © 2020 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Clark, Tristan W. Brendish, Nathan J Poole, Stephen Naidu, Vasanth V. Mansbridge, Christopher Norton, Nicholas Wheeler, Helen Presland, Laura Ewings, Sean Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19 |
title | Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19 |
title_full | Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19 |
title_short | Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19 |
title_sort | diagnostic accuracy of the febridx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected covid-19 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32579983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.051 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT clarktristanw diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19 AT brendishnathanj diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19 AT poolestephen diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19 AT naiduvasanthv diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19 AT mansbridgechristopher diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19 AT nortonnicholas diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19 AT wheelerhelen diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19 AT preslandlaura diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19 AT ewingssean diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19 |