Cargando…

Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19

INTRODUCTION: Management of the COVID-19 pandemic is hampered by long delays associated with centralised laboratory PCR testing. In hospitals this leads to poor patient flow and nosocomial transmission and so rapid, accurate diagnostic tests are urgently required. The FebriDx is a point-of-care test...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clark, Tristan W., Brendish, Nathan J, Poole, Stephen, Naidu, Vasanth V., Mansbridge, Christopher, Norton, Nicholas, Wheeler, Helen, Presland, Laura, Ewings, Sean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32579983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.051
_version_ 1783548595245416448
author Clark, Tristan W.
Brendish, Nathan J
Poole, Stephen
Naidu, Vasanth V.
Mansbridge, Christopher
Norton, Nicholas
Wheeler, Helen
Presland, Laura
Ewings, Sean
author_facet Clark, Tristan W.
Brendish, Nathan J
Poole, Stephen
Naidu, Vasanth V.
Mansbridge, Christopher
Norton, Nicholas
Wheeler, Helen
Presland, Laura
Ewings, Sean
author_sort Clark, Tristan W.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Management of the COVID-19 pandemic is hampered by long delays associated with centralised laboratory PCR testing. In hospitals this leads to poor patient flow and nosocomial transmission and so rapid, accurate diagnostic tests are urgently required. The FebriDx is a point-of-care test that detects an antiviral host response protein in finger prick blood within 10 min, but its accuracy for the identification of COVID-19 is unknown. METHODS: We performed a real-world diagnostic accuracy study of FebriDx in hospitalised patients during the first wave of the pandemic. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated based on FebriDx results compared to the reference standard of SARS-CoV-2 PCR on combined nose and throat swabs. A multivariable predictive model including FebriDx, age, sex, and clinical characteristics was developed and underwent internal validation. RESULTS: FebriDx was performed on 251 patients and gave a valid result in 248. 118 of 248 (48%) were PCR positive for COVID-19. FebriDx results were available after 10 min compared with 1.7 (1.6 to 2.1) hours with point-of-care PCR testing and 23.4 (17.2 to 31.1) hours with laboratory PCR testing. Sensitivity of FebriDx for the identification of COVID-19 was 93% (110/118; 95% CI 87 to 97%) and specificity was 86% (112/130; 95%CI 79 to 92%). Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 6.73 (95%CI 4.37 to 10.37) and 0.08 (95%CI 0.04 to 0.15) respectively. In the multivariate model age, sex and other clinical features did not contribute significantly to the effect of the FebriDx result in distinguishing patients with and without COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: During the first wave of the pandemic, FebriDx had high accuracy for the identification of COVID-19 in hospitalised adults and could be deployed as a front door triage tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14966673
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7306108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73061082020-06-22 Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19 Clark, Tristan W. Brendish, Nathan J Poole, Stephen Naidu, Vasanth V. Mansbridge, Christopher Norton, Nicholas Wheeler, Helen Presland, Laura Ewings, Sean J Infect Article INTRODUCTION: Management of the COVID-19 pandemic is hampered by long delays associated with centralised laboratory PCR testing. In hospitals this leads to poor patient flow and nosocomial transmission and so rapid, accurate diagnostic tests are urgently required. The FebriDx is a point-of-care test that detects an antiviral host response protein in finger prick blood within 10 min, but its accuracy for the identification of COVID-19 is unknown. METHODS: We performed a real-world diagnostic accuracy study of FebriDx in hospitalised patients during the first wave of the pandemic. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated based on FebriDx results compared to the reference standard of SARS-CoV-2 PCR on combined nose and throat swabs. A multivariable predictive model including FebriDx, age, sex, and clinical characteristics was developed and underwent internal validation. RESULTS: FebriDx was performed on 251 patients and gave a valid result in 248. 118 of 248 (48%) were PCR positive for COVID-19. FebriDx results were available after 10 min compared with 1.7 (1.6 to 2.1) hours with point-of-care PCR testing and 23.4 (17.2 to 31.1) hours with laboratory PCR testing. Sensitivity of FebriDx for the identification of COVID-19 was 93% (110/118; 95% CI 87 to 97%) and specificity was 86% (112/130; 95%CI 79 to 92%). Positive and negative likelihood ratios were 6.73 (95%CI 4.37 to 10.37) and 0.08 (95%CI 0.04 to 0.15) respectively. In the multivariate model age, sex and other clinical features did not contribute significantly to the effect of the FebriDx result in distinguishing patients with and without COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: During the first wave of the pandemic, FebriDx had high accuracy for the identification of COVID-19 in hospitalised adults and could be deployed as a front door triage tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN14966673 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2020-10 2020-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7306108/ /pubmed/32579983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.051 Text en © 2020 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Clark, Tristan W.
Brendish, Nathan J
Poole, Stephen
Naidu, Vasanth V.
Mansbridge, Christopher
Norton, Nicholas
Wheeler, Helen
Presland, Laura
Ewings, Sean
Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19
title Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of the FebriDx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected COVID-19
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of the febridx host response point-of-care test in patients hospitalised with suspected covid-19
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32579983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2020.06.051
work_keys_str_mv AT clarktristanw diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19
AT brendishnathanj diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19
AT poolestephen diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19
AT naiduvasanthv diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19
AT mansbridgechristopher diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19
AT nortonnicholas diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19
AT wheelerhelen diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19
AT preslandlaura diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19
AT ewingssean diagnosticaccuracyofthefebridxhostresponsepointofcaretestinpatientshospitalisedwithsuspectedcovid19