Cargando…

Evaluating the Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores in Identifying High-Risk Individuals for Eight Common Cancers

BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies have identified common genetic risk variants in many loci associated with multiple cancers. We sought to systematically evaluate the utility of these risk variants in identifying high-risk individuals for eight common cancers. METHODS: We constructed polyg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jia, Guochong, Lu, Yingchang, Wen, Wanqing, Long, Jirong, Liu, Ying, Tao, Ran, Li, Bingshan, Denny, Joshua C, Shu, Xiao-Ou, Zheng, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaa021
_version_ 1783548607552552960
author Jia, Guochong
Lu, Yingchang
Wen, Wanqing
Long, Jirong
Liu, Ying
Tao, Ran
Li, Bingshan
Denny, Joshua C
Shu, Xiao-Ou
Zheng, Wei
author_facet Jia, Guochong
Lu, Yingchang
Wen, Wanqing
Long, Jirong
Liu, Ying
Tao, Ran
Li, Bingshan
Denny, Joshua C
Shu, Xiao-Ou
Zheng, Wei
author_sort Jia, Guochong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies have identified common genetic risk variants in many loci associated with multiple cancers. We sought to systematically evaluate the utility of these risk variants in identifying high-risk individuals for eight common cancers. METHODS: We constructed polygenic risk scores (PRS) using genome-wide association studies–identified risk variants for each cancer. Using data from 400 812 participants of European descent in a population-based cohort study, UK Biobank, we estimated hazard ratios associated with PRS using Cox proportional hazard models and evaluated the performance of the PRS in cancer risk prediction and their ability to identify individuals at more than a twofold elevated risk, a risk level comparable to a moderate-penetrance mutation in known cancer predisposition genes. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 5.8 years, 14 584 incident case patients of cancers were identified (ranging from 358 epithelial ovarian cancer case patients to 4430 prostate cancer case patients). Compared with those at an average risk, individuals among the highest 5% of the PRS had a two- to threefold elevated risk for cancer of the prostate, breast, pancreas, colorectal, or ovary, and an approximately 1.5-fold elevated risk of cancer of the lung, bladder, or kidney. The areas under the curve ranged from 0.567 to 0.662. Using PRS, 40.4% of the study participants can be classified as having more than a twofold elevated risk for at least one site-specific cancer. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of the general population can be identified at an elevated cancer risk by PRS, supporting the potential clinical utility of PRS for personalized cancer risk prediction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7306192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73061922020-06-25 Evaluating the Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores in Identifying High-Risk Individuals for Eight Common Cancers Jia, Guochong Lu, Yingchang Wen, Wanqing Long, Jirong Liu, Ying Tao, Ran Li, Bingshan Denny, Joshua C Shu, Xiao-Ou Zheng, Wei JNCI Cancer Spectr Article BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies have identified common genetic risk variants in many loci associated with multiple cancers. We sought to systematically evaluate the utility of these risk variants in identifying high-risk individuals for eight common cancers. METHODS: We constructed polygenic risk scores (PRS) using genome-wide association studies–identified risk variants for each cancer. Using data from 400 812 participants of European descent in a population-based cohort study, UK Biobank, we estimated hazard ratios associated with PRS using Cox proportional hazard models and evaluated the performance of the PRS in cancer risk prediction and their ability to identify individuals at more than a twofold elevated risk, a risk level comparable to a moderate-penetrance mutation in known cancer predisposition genes. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 5.8 years, 14 584 incident case patients of cancers were identified (ranging from 358 epithelial ovarian cancer case patients to 4430 prostate cancer case patients). Compared with those at an average risk, individuals among the highest 5% of the PRS had a two- to threefold elevated risk for cancer of the prostate, breast, pancreas, colorectal, or ovary, and an approximately 1.5-fold elevated risk of cancer of the lung, bladder, or kidney. The areas under the curve ranged from 0.567 to 0.662. Using PRS, 40.4% of the study participants can be classified as having more than a twofold elevated risk for at least one site-specific cancer. CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of the general population can be identified at an elevated cancer risk by PRS, supporting the potential clinical utility of PRS for personalized cancer risk prediction. Oxford University Press 2020-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7306192/ /pubmed/32596635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaa021 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Article
Jia, Guochong
Lu, Yingchang
Wen, Wanqing
Long, Jirong
Liu, Ying
Tao, Ran
Li, Bingshan
Denny, Joshua C
Shu, Xiao-Ou
Zheng, Wei
Evaluating the Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores in Identifying High-Risk Individuals for Eight Common Cancers
title Evaluating the Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores in Identifying High-Risk Individuals for Eight Common Cancers
title_full Evaluating the Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores in Identifying High-Risk Individuals for Eight Common Cancers
title_fullStr Evaluating the Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores in Identifying High-Risk Individuals for Eight Common Cancers
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores in Identifying High-Risk Individuals for Eight Common Cancers
title_short Evaluating the Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores in Identifying High-Risk Individuals for Eight Common Cancers
title_sort evaluating the utility of polygenic risk scores in identifying high-risk individuals for eight common cancers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaa021
work_keys_str_mv AT jiaguochong evaluatingtheutilityofpolygenicriskscoresinidentifyinghighriskindividualsforeightcommoncancers
AT luyingchang evaluatingtheutilityofpolygenicriskscoresinidentifyinghighriskindividualsforeightcommoncancers
AT wenwanqing evaluatingtheutilityofpolygenicriskscoresinidentifyinghighriskindividualsforeightcommoncancers
AT longjirong evaluatingtheutilityofpolygenicriskscoresinidentifyinghighriskindividualsforeightcommoncancers
AT liuying evaluatingtheutilityofpolygenicriskscoresinidentifyinghighriskindividualsforeightcommoncancers
AT taoran evaluatingtheutilityofpolygenicriskscoresinidentifyinghighriskindividualsforeightcommoncancers
AT libingshan evaluatingtheutilityofpolygenicriskscoresinidentifyinghighriskindividualsforeightcommoncancers
AT dennyjoshuac evaluatingtheutilityofpolygenicriskscoresinidentifyinghighriskindividualsforeightcommoncancers
AT shuxiaoou evaluatingtheutilityofpolygenicriskscoresinidentifyinghighriskindividualsforeightcommoncancers
AT zhengwei evaluatingtheutilityofpolygenicriskscoresinidentifyinghighriskindividualsforeightcommoncancers