Cargando…
Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report
INTRODUCTION: Crush syndrome (CS) is a condition with a high morbidity and mortality due to severe electrolyte disorders, circulatory dysfunction and multiple organ failure, secondary to severe rhabdomyolysis and reperfusion injuries. There is controversy about the role of fasciotomy in the treatmen...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32563818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.05.087 |
_version_ | 1783548668865937408 |
---|---|
author | Arango-Granados, María Camila Cruz Mendoza, Diego Fernando Salcedo Cadavid, Alexander Ernesto García Marín, Alberto Federico |
author_facet | Arango-Granados, María Camila Cruz Mendoza, Diego Fernando Salcedo Cadavid, Alexander Ernesto García Marín, Alberto Federico |
author_sort | Arango-Granados, María Camila |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Crush syndrome (CS) is a condition with a high morbidity and mortality due to severe electrolyte disorders, circulatory dysfunction and multiple organ failure, secondary to severe rhabdomyolysis and reperfusion injuries. There is controversy about the role of fasciotomy in the treatment of compartment syndromes due to crush injuries and it is still unknown if early amputation has patient-centered benefits. CASE PRESENTATION: This is a 29-year-old patient whose lower body was trapped for 50 h under a 40-meter landslide. Upon admission the left thigh was edematous and painful. Laboratories revealed a creatinine of 1.58 mg/dL, hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, hyperlactatemia and creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) of 88,700 U/L, suggesting CS. Despite fluid and bicarbonate infusion his renal function worsened, CPK rose and left thigh became more tense, so a fasciotomy was performed. He developed a distributive shock refractory to vasopressors, steroids and methylene blue so amputation was proposed. Two hours after amputation the vasopressor support was nearly withdrawn. DISCUSSION: This case suggests a potential benefit of amputation in patients with CS and progressive deterioration despite aggressive resuscitation. It also invites to think if this is a decision that should be considered before the establishment or in the initial stages of the syndrome, even if the viability of the extremity is still questionable. CONCLUSION: The presence of risk factors for poor prognosis can favor amputation despite the apparent viability of the limb and the morbidity of losing an extremity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7306514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73065142020-06-25 Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report Arango-Granados, María Camila Cruz Mendoza, Diego Fernando Salcedo Cadavid, Alexander Ernesto García Marín, Alberto Federico Int J Surg Case Rep Article INTRODUCTION: Crush syndrome (CS) is a condition with a high morbidity and mortality due to severe electrolyte disorders, circulatory dysfunction and multiple organ failure, secondary to severe rhabdomyolysis and reperfusion injuries. There is controversy about the role of fasciotomy in the treatment of compartment syndromes due to crush injuries and it is still unknown if early amputation has patient-centered benefits. CASE PRESENTATION: This is a 29-year-old patient whose lower body was trapped for 50 h under a 40-meter landslide. Upon admission the left thigh was edematous and painful. Laboratories revealed a creatinine of 1.58 mg/dL, hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, hyperlactatemia and creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) of 88,700 U/L, suggesting CS. Despite fluid and bicarbonate infusion his renal function worsened, CPK rose and left thigh became more tense, so a fasciotomy was performed. He developed a distributive shock refractory to vasopressors, steroids and methylene blue so amputation was proposed. Two hours after amputation the vasopressor support was nearly withdrawn. DISCUSSION: This case suggests a potential benefit of amputation in patients with CS and progressive deterioration despite aggressive resuscitation. It also invites to think if this is a decision that should be considered before the establishment or in the initial stages of the syndrome, even if the viability of the extremity is still questionable. CONCLUSION: The presence of risk factors for poor prognosis can favor amputation despite the apparent viability of the limb and the morbidity of losing an extremity. Elsevier 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7306514/ /pubmed/32563818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.05.087 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Arango-Granados, María Camila Cruz Mendoza, Diego Fernando Salcedo Cadavid, Alexander Ernesto García Marín, Alberto Federico Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report |
title | Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report |
title_full | Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report |
title_fullStr | Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report |
title_full_unstemmed | Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report |
title_short | Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report |
title_sort | amputation in crush syndrome: a case report |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32563818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.05.087 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arangogranadosmariacamila amputationincrushsyndromeacasereport AT cruzmendozadiegofernando amputationincrushsyndromeacasereport AT salcedocadavidalexanderernesto amputationincrushsyndromeacasereport AT garciamarinalbertofederico amputationincrushsyndromeacasereport |