Cargando…

Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report

INTRODUCTION: Crush syndrome (CS) is a condition with a high morbidity and mortality due to severe electrolyte disorders, circulatory dysfunction and multiple organ failure, secondary to severe rhabdomyolysis and reperfusion injuries. There is controversy about the role of fasciotomy in the treatmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arango-Granados, María Camila, Cruz Mendoza, Diego Fernando, Salcedo Cadavid, Alexander Ernesto, García Marín, Alberto Federico
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32563818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.05.087
_version_ 1783548668865937408
author Arango-Granados, María Camila
Cruz Mendoza, Diego Fernando
Salcedo Cadavid, Alexander Ernesto
García Marín, Alberto Federico
author_facet Arango-Granados, María Camila
Cruz Mendoza, Diego Fernando
Salcedo Cadavid, Alexander Ernesto
García Marín, Alberto Federico
author_sort Arango-Granados, María Camila
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Crush syndrome (CS) is a condition with a high morbidity and mortality due to severe electrolyte disorders, circulatory dysfunction and multiple organ failure, secondary to severe rhabdomyolysis and reperfusion injuries. There is controversy about the role of fasciotomy in the treatment of compartment syndromes due to crush injuries and it is still unknown if early amputation has patient-centered benefits. CASE PRESENTATION: This is a 29-year-old patient whose lower body was trapped for 50 h under a 40-meter landslide. Upon admission the left thigh was edematous and painful. Laboratories revealed a creatinine of 1.58 mg/dL, hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, hyperlactatemia and creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) of 88,700 U/L, suggesting CS. Despite fluid and bicarbonate infusion his renal function worsened, CPK rose and left thigh became more tense, so a fasciotomy was performed. He developed a distributive shock refractory to vasopressors, steroids and methylene blue so amputation was proposed. Two hours after amputation the vasopressor support was nearly withdrawn. DISCUSSION: This case suggests a potential benefit of amputation in patients with CS and progressive deterioration despite aggressive resuscitation. It also invites to think if this is a decision that should be considered before the establishment or in the initial stages of the syndrome, even if the viability of the extremity is still questionable. CONCLUSION: The presence of risk factors for poor prognosis can favor amputation despite the apparent viability of the limb and the morbidity of losing an extremity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7306514
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73065142020-06-25 Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report Arango-Granados, María Camila Cruz Mendoza, Diego Fernando Salcedo Cadavid, Alexander Ernesto García Marín, Alberto Federico Int J Surg Case Rep Article INTRODUCTION: Crush syndrome (CS) is a condition with a high morbidity and mortality due to severe electrolyte disorders, circulatory dysfunction and multiple organ failure, secondary to severe rhabdomyolysis and reperfusion injuries. There is controversy about the role of fasciotomy in the treatment of compartment syndromes due to crush injuries and it is still unknown if early amputation has patient-centered benefits. CASE PRESENTATION: This is a 29-year-old patient whose lower body was trapped for 50 h under a 40-meter landslide. Upon admission the left thigh was edematous and painful. Laboratories revealed a creatinine of 1.58 mg/dL, hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, hyperlactatemia and creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) of 88,700 U/L, suggesting CS. Despite fluid and bicarbonate infusion his renal function worsened, CPK rose and left thigh became more tense, so a fasciotomy was performed. He developed a distributive shock refractory to vasopressors, steroids and methylene blue so amputation was proposed. Two hours after amputation the vasopressor support was nearly withdrawn. DISCUSSION: This case suggests a potential benefit of amputation in patients with CS and progressive deterioration despite aggressive resuscitation. It also invites to think if this is a decision that should be considered before the establishment or in the initial stages of the syndrome, even if the viability of the extremity is still questionable. CONCLUSION: The presence of risk factors for poor prognosis can favor amputation despite the apparent viability of the limb and the morbidity of losing an extremity. Elsevier 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7306514/ /pubmed/32563818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.05.087 Text en © 2020 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Arango-Granados, María Camila
Cruz Mendoza, Diego Fernando
Salcedo Cadavid, Alexander Ernesto
García Marín, Alberto Federico
Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report
title Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report
title_full Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report
title_fullStr Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report
title_short Amputation in crush syndrome: A case report
title_sort amputation in crush syndrome: a case report
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306514/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32563818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.05.087
work_keys_str_mv AT arangogranadosmariacamila amputationincrushsyndromeacasereport
AT cruzmendozadiegofernando amputationincrushsyndromeacasereport
AT salcedocadavidalexanderernesto amputationincrushsyndromeacasereport
AT garciamarinalbertofederico amputationincrushsyndromeacasereport