Cargando…

Novel Hump Measurement System With a 3D Camera for Early Diagnosis of Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Study of Accuracy and Reliability

Background Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a potentially progressive deformity, and early detection is crucial for timely intervention. However, the methods and criteria justifying screening for pediatric scoliosis remain controversial. We have, therefore, independently developed a Digital...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sato, Tatsuya, Yonezawa, Ikuho, Akimoto, Toshinari, Nobuyuki, Terada, Shimamura, Yukitoshi, Muto, Osamu, Suzuki, Teppei, Momomura, Rei, Uno, Koki, Yamazaki, Ken, Fujiwara, Kenta, Misawa, Akiko, Kaneko, Kazuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32582490
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8229
Descripción
Sumario:Background Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a potentially progressive deformity, and early detection is crucial for timely intervention. However, the methods and criteria justifying screening for pediatric scoliosis remain controversial. We have, therefore, independently developed a Digital Moiré (DM) as a tool for scoliosis screening. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of DM for scoliosis screening. Methods From March 2016 to March 2017, 126 patients (18 boys, 108 girls, mean age: 13.2 ± 2.2 years) with AIS underwent radiographic imaging of their whole spine. We tested the accuracy and reliability of DM by categorizing the examination results as Class 0 (no abnormality), Class 1 (return visit in one year), and Class 2 (further examination needed) and determined the distribution of the population by Cobb angle. The intra/inter-rater reliability and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to categorize the patients with positive findings into Class 1 or 2. Results Regarding the population distribution per Cobb angle in each of the distributions, 11 patients (8.7%) were Class 0, of which nine and two patients had Cobb angle ≤ 10 ° and > 10 °, respectively. There were 20 (15.9% ) Class 1 cases, of which 17 and three had Cobb angle ≤ 10 ° and > 10 °, respectively. Of the 95 (75.4%) Class 2 cases, five and 90 had a Cobb angle of ≤ 10 ° and > 10 °, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of patients with positive findings showed that the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and false-positive rate were 0.76, 0.98, 0.53, and 0.47, respectively, when predicting Cobb angle > 10°. Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability were 0.73 and 0.70, respectively. Conclusions This study demonstrated the usefulness of DM for determining whether a child with AIS requires a follow-up observation such as radiograph. Our findings suggest that the novel DM shows high accuracy and reliability for scoliosis screening.