Cargando…

The Efficacy and Safety of Simple-Needling Therapy for Treating Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Clinical investigators have found that the use of needling in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has a good clinical application prospect in recent years. However, these studies were insufficient to provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of simple-needling for AS. So, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xuan, Yichen, Huang, Hui, Huang, Yiyong, Liu, Duanyong, Hu, Xiuwu, Geng, Lele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4276380
_version_ 1783548730424688640
author Xuan, Yichen
Huang, Hui
Huang, Yiyong
Liu, Duanyong
Hu, Xiuwu
Geng, Lele
author_facet Xuan, Yichen
Huang, Hui
Huang, Yiyong
Liu, Duanyong
Hu, Xiuwu
Geng, Lele
author_sort Xuan, Yichen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical investigators have found that the use of needling in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has a good clinical application prospect in recent years. However, these studies were insufficient to provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of simple-needling for AS. So, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of simple-needling for treating AS. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wangfang database (Wanfang), Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), and any other gray literature sources for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that used simple-needling to treat AS before June 2019 with the language restriction of Chinese and English. Researchers evaluated the retrieved literature studies and extracted valid data according to relevant requirements and used RevMan5.3 software for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies were included, all of which were Chinese literature studies, involving 729 patients. Compared with the control groups, simple-needling groups had a better effect on the clinical effective rate (RR = 1.20, 95% CI (1.11, 1.29), P < 0.00001), TCM syndrome score (MD = −5.26, 95% CI (−5.99, −4.53), P < 0.00001), symptom score (MD = −8.08, 95% CI (−10.18, −5.97), P < 0.00001), and Schober test outcome (MD = 0.39, 95% CI (0.15, 0.64), P=0.002). Sensibility analysis was based on the leave-one-out cross-validation procedure, and the results showed no significant changes. Most studies did not describe adverse reactions. The funnel plot suggested publication bias on clinical effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that simple-needling was effective as an intervention for AS. However, due to the low quality of the methodology of included studies, the designs of clinical trials were not rigorously standardized. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out multiquality RCTs for verification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7306850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73068502020-07-01 The Efficacy and Safety of Simple-Needling Therapy for Treating Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Xuan, Yichen Huang, Hui Huang, Yiyong Liu, Duanyong Hu, Xiuwu Geng, Lele Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Review Article BACKGROUND: Clinical investigators have found that the use of needling in the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has a good clinical application prospect in recent years. However, these studies were insufficient to provide evidence for the efficacy and safety of simple-needling for AS. So, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of simple-needling for treating AS. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Wangfang database (Wanfang), Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), and any other gray literature sources for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that used simple-needling to treat AS before June 2019 with the language restriction of Chinese and English. Researchers evaluated the retrieved literature studies and extracted valid data according to relevant requirements and used RevMan5.3 software for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 10 studies were included, all of which were Chinese literature studies, involving 729 patients. Compared with the control groups, simple-needling groups had a better effect on the clinical effective rate (RR = 1.20, 95% CI (1.11, 1.29), P < 0.00001), TCM syndrome score (MD = −5.26, 95% CI (−5.99, −4.53), P < 0.00001), symptom score (MD = −8.08, 95% CI (−10.18, −5.97), P < 0.00001), and Schober test outcome (MD = 0.39, 95% CI (0.15, 0.64), P=0.002). Sensibility analysis was based on the leave-one-out cross-validation procedure, and the results showed no significant changes. Most studies did not describe adverse reactions. The funnel plot suggested publication bias on clinical effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that simple-needling was effective as an intervention for AS. However, due to the low quality of the methodology of included studies, the designs of clinical trials were not rigorously standardized. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out multiquality RCTs for verification. Hindawi 2020-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7306850/ /pubmed/32617106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4276380 Text en Copyright © 2020 Yichen Xuan et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Xuan, Yichen
Huang, Hui
Huang, Yiyong
Liu, Duanyong
Hu, Xiuwu
Geng, Lele
The Efficacy and Safety of Simple-Needling Therapy for Treating Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title The Efficacy and Safety of Simple-Needling Therapy for Treating Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full The Efficacy and Safety of Simple-Needling Therapy for Treating Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr The Efficacy and Safety of Simple-Needling Therapy for Treating Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy and Safety of Simple-Needling Therapy for Treating Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short The Efficacy and Safety of Simple-Needling Therapy for Treating Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort efficacy and safety of simple-needling therapy for treating ankylosing spondylitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32617106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/4276380
work_keys_str_mv AT xuanyichen theefficacyandsafetyofsimpleneedlingtherapyfortreatingankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huanghui theefficacyandsafetyofsimpleneedlingtherapyfortreatingankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huangyiyong theefficacyandsafetyofsimpleneedlingtherapyfortreatingankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liuduanyong theefficacyandsafetyofsimpleneedlingtherapyfortreatingankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huxiuwu theefficacyandsafetyofsimpleneedlingtherapyfortreatingankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT genglele theefficacyandsafetyofsimpleneedlingtherapyfortreatingankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT xuanyichen efficacyandsafetyofsimpleneedlingtherapyfortreatingankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huanghui efficacyandsafetyofsimpleneedlingtherapyfortreatingankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huangyiyong efficacyandsafetyofsimpleneedlingtherapyfortreatingankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT liuduanyong efficacyandsafetyofsimpleneedlingtherapyfortreatingankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT huxiuwu efficacyandsafetyofsimpleneedlingtherapyfortreatingankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT genglele efficacyandsafetyofsimpleneedlingtherapyfortreatingankylosingspondylitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials