Cargando…

Assessment of Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Goniometer

PURPOSE: The current study was designed to assess interrater and intrarater validity of cervical range of motion measurements performed with a CROM goniometer. Material and Methods. The study involved 95 healthy university students (31 males and 64 females) aged 20-24 years. Two examiners performed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wolan-Nieroda, Andzelina, Guzik, Agnieszka, Mocur, Paulina, Drużbicki, Mariusz, Maciejczak, Andrzej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8908035
_version_ 1783548730901790720
author Wolan-Nieroda, Andzelina
Guzik, Agnieszka
Mocur, Paulina
Drużbicki, Mariusz
Maciejczak, Andrzej
author_facet Wolan-Nieroda, Andzelina
Guzik, Agnieszka
Mocur, Paulina
Drużbicki, Mariusz
Maciejczak, Andrzej
author_sort Wolan-Nieroda, Andzelina
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The current study was designed to assess interrater and intrarater validity of cervical range of motion measurements performed with a CROM goniometer. Material and Methods. The study involved 95 healthy university students (31 males and 64 females) aged 20-24 years. Two examiners performed measurements of cervical range of motion using a CROM goniometer. The same subjects were examined again after two weeks, in the same conditions. The results acquired by one rater during the first and the second examination were compared for reproducibility, while the results obtained by the two examiners were compared to assess validity and reliability of the tool. Cronbach's alpha was applied to determine intrarater reliability, and the values of correlations were used to assess the interrater agreement. RESULTS: Analysis of the results showed both intrarater and interrater agreement in all the measures of cervical range of motion. The highest intrarater and interrater concordance was observed in the measure of extension. Intrarater agreement for Examiner 1 was reflected by Cronbach's alpha = 0.85, and for Examiner 2 by Cronbach's alpha = 0.89. As for the interrater agreement in the measure of extension, the value of correlation in both the first and the second measurement amounted to r = 0.89. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements performed with the CROM goniometer show interrater and intrarater agreement in assessments of cervical range of motion. The CROM goniometer can be recommended for use in daily clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7306852
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73068522020-07-04 Assessment of Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Goniometer Wolan-Nieroda, Andzelina Guzik, Agnieszka Mocur, Paulina Drużbicki, Mariusz Maciejczak, Andrzej Biomed Res Int Research Article PURPOSE: The current study was designed to assess interrater and intrarater validity of cervical range of motion measurements performed with a CROM goniometer. Material and Methods. The study involved 95 healthy university students (31 males and 64 females) aged 20-24 years. Two examiners performed measurements of cervical range of motion using a CROM goniometer. The same subjects were examined again after two weeks, in the same conditions. The results acquired by one rater during the first and the second examination were compared for reproducibility, while the results obtained by the two examiners were compared to assess validity and reliability of the tool. Cronbach's alpha was applied to determine intrarater reliability, and the values of correlations were used to assess the interrater agreement. RESULTS: Analysis of the results showed both intrarater and interrater agreement in all the measures of cervical range of motion. The highest intrarater and interrater concordance was observed in the measure of extension. Intrarater agreement for Examiner 1 was reflected by Cronbach's alpha = 0.85, and for Examiner 2 by Cronbach's alpha = 0.89. As for the interrater agreement in the measure of extension, the value of correlation in both the first and the second measurement amounted to r = 0.89. CONCLUSIONS: Measurements performed with the CROM goniometer show interrater and intrarater agreement in assessments of cervical range of motion. The CROM goniometer can be recommended for use in daily clinical practice. Hindawi 2020-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7306852/ /pubmed/32626769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8908035 Text en Copyright © 2020 Andzelina Wolan-Nieroda et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wolan-Nieroda, Andzelina
Guzik, Agnieszka
Mocur, Paulina
Drużbicki, Mariusz
Maciejczak, Andrzej
Assessment of Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Goniometer
title Assessment of Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Goniometer
title_full Assessment of Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Goniometer
title_fullStr Assessment of Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Goniometer
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Goniometer
title_short Assessment of Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) Goniometer
title_sort assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability of cervical range of motion (crom) goniometer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306852/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32626769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8908035
work_keys_str_mv AT wolannierodaandzelina assessmentofinterraterandintraraterreliabilityofcervicalrangeofmotioncromgoniometer
AT guzikagnieszka assessmentofinterraterandintraraterreliabilityofcervicalrangeofmotioncromgoniometer
AT mocurpaulina assessmentofinterraterandintraraterreliabilityofcervicalrangeofmotioncromgoniometer
AT druzbickimariusz assessmentofinterraterandintraraterreliabilityofcervicalrangeofmotioncromgoniometer
AT maciejczakandrzej assessmentofinterraterandintraraterreliabilityofcervicalrangeofmotioncromgoniometer