Cargando…

Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution

OBJECTIVE: We compared the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive parafascicular surgery (MIPS) as a frontline treatment for spontaneous supratentorial ICH to medical management. Patients. The sample consisted of 17 patients who underwent MIPS from January 2014 to December 2016 and a compari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillips, Victoria L., Roy, Anil K., Ratcliff, Jonathan, Pradilla, Gustavo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32582426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6503038
_version_ 1783548731584413696
author Phillips, Victoria L.
Roy, Anil K.
Ratcliff, Jonathan
Pradilla, Gustavo
author_facet Phillips, Victoria L.
Roy, Anil K.
Ratcliff, Jonathan
Pradilla, Gustavo
author_sort Phillips, Victoria L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We compared the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive parafascicular surgery (MIPS) as a frontline treatment for spontaneous supratentorial ICH to medical management. Patients. The sample consisted of 17 patients who underwent MIPS from January 2014 to December 2016 and a comparison group of 23 patients who were medically managed from June 2012 to December 2013. All had an International Classification of Disease (ICD) diagnosis of 431 and were treated at Grady Memorial Hospital, an urban, public, safety-net hospital. METHODS: The primary endpoint was risk of inpatient mortality. Secondary endpoints were rates of inpatient infection and favorable discharge status, defined as discharge to home or rehabilitation facility. Demographics and pre- and postclinical outcomes were compared using t-tests, the Mann–Whitney test, and chi-squared tests for continuous, ordinal and categorical measures, respectively. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the time to inpatient death. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine treatment effects on secondary outcomes. We also conducted exploratory subgroup analyses which compared MIPS to two medical management subgroups: those who had surgery during their hospitalization and those that did not. RESULTS: Two patients (12%) died in the MIPS group compared to three (12%) in the medical management group. MIPS did not increase the risk of inpatient mortality relative to medical management. Rates of inpatient infection did not differ significantly between the two groups; eight MIPS patients (47%) and 13 medically managed patients (50%) contracted infections. MIPS significantly increased the likelihood of favorable discharge status (odds ratio (OR) 1.77; 95% CI, 1.12–21.9) compared to medical management. No outcome measures were significantly different between MIPS and the medical management subgroup without surgery, while rates of favorable discharge were higher among the MIPS patients compared to the medical management group with surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that MIPS, as a frontline treatment for spontaneous ICH, versus medical management for spontaneous ICH warrants further investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7306855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73068552020-06-23 Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution Phillips, Victoria L. Roy, Anil K. Ratcliff, Jonathan Pradilla, Gustavo Stroke Res Treat Research Article OBJECTIVE: We compared the safety and effectiveness of minimally invasive parafascicular surgery (MIPS) as a frontline treatment for spontaneous supratentorial ICH to medical management. Patients. The sample consisted of 17 patients who underwent MIPS from January 2014 to December 2016 and a comparison group of 23 patients who were medically managed from June 2012 to December 2013. All had an International Classification of Disease (ICD) diagnosis of 431 and were treated at Grady Memorial Hospital, an urban, public, safety-net hospital. METHODS: The primary endpoint was risk of inpatient mortality. Secondary endpoints were rates of inpatient infection and favorable discharge status, defined as discharge to home or rehabilitation facility. Demographics and pre- and postclinical outcomes were compared using t-tests, the Mann–Whitney test, and chi-squared tests for continuous, ordinal and categorical measures, respectively. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the time to inpatient death. Logistic regression analyses were used to determine treatment effects on secondary outcomes. We also conducted exploratory subgroup analyses which compared MIPS to two medical management subgroups: those who had surgery during their hospitalization and those that did not. RESULTS: Two patients (12%) died in the MIPS group compared to three (12%) in the medical management group. MIPS did not increase the risk of inpatient mortality relative to medical management. Rates of inpatient infection did not differ significantly between the two groups; eight MIPS patients (47%) and 13 medically managed patients (50%) contracted infections. MIPS significantly increased the likelihood of favorable discharge status (odds ratio (OR) 1.77; 95% CI, 1.12–21.9) compared to medical management. No outcome measures were significantly different between MIPS and the medical management subgroup without surgery, while rates of favorable discharge were higher among the MIPS patients compared to the medical management group with surgery. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that MIPS, as a frontline treatment for spontaneous ICH, versus medical management for spontaneous ICH warrants further investigation. Hindawi 2020-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7306855/ /pubmed/32582426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6503038 Text en Copyright © 2020 Victoria L. Phillips et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Phillips, Victoria L.
Roy, Anil K.
Ratcliff, Jonathan
Pradilla, Gustavo
Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution
title Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution
title_full Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution
title_fullStr Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution
title_full_unstemmed Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution
title_short Minimally Invasive Parafascicular Surgery (MIPS) for Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Compared to Medical Management: A Case Series Comparison for a Single Institution
title_sort minimally invasive parafascicular surgery (mips) for spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage compared to medical management: a case series comparison for a single institution
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7306855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32582426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6503038
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipsvictorial minimallyinvasiveparafascicularsurgerymipsforspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhagecomparedtomedicalmanagementacaseseriescomparisonforasingleinstitution
AT royanilk minimallyinvasiveparafascicularsurgerymipsforspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhagecomparedtomedicalmanagementacaseseriescomparisonforasingleinstitution
AT ratcliffjonathan minimallyinvasiveparafascicularsurgerymipsforspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhagecomparedtomedicalmanagementacaseseriescomparisonforasingleinstitution
AT pradillagustavo minimallyinvasiveparafascicularsurgerymipsforspontaneousintracerebralhemorrhagecomparedtomedicalmanagementacaseseriescomparisonforasingleinstitution