Cargando…

Cup‐Cage Solution for Massive Acetabular Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Our systematic review compiled multiple studies and evaluated survivorship and clinical outcomes of cup‐cage construct usage in the management of massive acetabular bone defects. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Chao‐xin, Huang, Zi‐da, Wu, Bai‐jian, Li, Wen‐bo, Fang, Xin‐yu, Zhang, Wen‐ming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7307242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32495512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12710
_version_ 1783548775408599040
author Wang, Chao‐xin
Huang, Zi‐da
Wu, Bai‐jian
Li, Wen‐bo
Fang, Xin‐yu
Zhang, Wen‐ming
author_facet Wang, Chao‐xin
Huang, Zi‐da
Wu, Bai‐jian
Li, Wen‐bo
Fang, Xin‐yu
Zhang, Wen‐ming
author_sort Wang, Chao‐xin
collection PubMed
description Our systematic review compiled multiple studies and evaluated survivorship and clinical outcomes of cup‐cage construct usage in the management of massive acetabular bone defects. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Various combinations of “acetabular”, “pelvis”, “cup cage” and their corresponding synonyms were used to search relevant articles in the Cochrane, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. Basic information of the functional scores, implant revision rate, and complication rate were selected as outcomes for analysis. Finally, a total of 11 articles published between 1999 and 2019 were selected, which include 232 patients with an average age of 68.5 years (range, 30–90). The mean follow‐up period was 48.85 months (range, 1–140). Our study shows that the cup‐cage construct has a good clinical outcome with a low revision rate and a low complication rate. Improved clinical outcomes of cup‐cage constructs were seen with a revision rate of 8% and an all‐cause complication rate of 20%. The most commonly reported complication was dislocation, followed by aseptic loosening, infection, and nerve injuries. In summary, it is a promising method for managing large acetabular bone defects in total hip revision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7307242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73072422020-06-23 Cup‐Cage Solution for Massive Acetabular Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Wang, Chao‐xin Huang, Zi‐da Wu, Bai‐jian Li, Wen‐bo Fang, Xin‐yu Zhang, Wen‐ming Orthop Surg Review Articles Our systematic review compiled multiple studies and evaluated survivorship and clinical outcomes of cup‐cage construct usage in the management of massive acetabular bone defects. This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Various combinations of “acetabular”, “pelvis”, “cup cage” and their corresponding synonyms were used to search relevant articles in the Cochrane, EMBASE, and PubMed databases. Basic information of the functional scores, implant revision rate, and complication rate were selected as outcomes for analysis. Finally, a total of 11 articles published between 1999 and 2019 were selected, which include 232 patients with an average age of 68.5 years (range, 30–90). The mean follow‐up period was 48.85 months (range, 1–140). Our study shows that the cup‐cage construct has a good clinical outcome with a low revision rate and a low complication rate. Improved clinical outcomes of cup‐cage constructs were seen with a revision rate of 8% and an all‐cause complication rate of 20%. The most commonly reported complication was dislocation, followed by aseptic loosening, infection, and nerve injuries. In summary, it is a promising method for managing large acetabular bone defects in total hip revision. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2020-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7307242/ /pubmed/32495512 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12710 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Wang, Chao‐xin
Huang, Zi‐da
Wu, Bai‐jian
Li, Wen‐bo
Fang, Xin‐yu
Zhang, Wen‐ming
Cup‐Cage Solution for Massive Acetabular Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title Cup‐Cage Solution for Massive Acetabular Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full Cup‐Cage Solution for Massive Acetabular Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_fullStr Cup‐Cage Solution for Massive Acetabular Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cup‐Cage Solution for Massive Acetabular Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_short Cup‐Cage Solution for Massive Acetabular Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
title_sort cup‐cage solution for massive acetabular defects: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7307242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32495512
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12710
work_keys_str_mv AT wangchaoxin cupcagesolutionformassiveacetabulardefectsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT huangzida cupcagesolutionformassiveacetabulardefectsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wubaijian cupcagesolutionformassiveacetabulardefectsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liwenbo cupcagesolutionformassiveacetabulardefectsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT fangxinyu cupcagesolutionformassiveacetabulardefectsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangwenming cupcagesolutionformassiveacetabulardefectsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis