Cargando…

How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing

OBJECTIVES: To establish how quality indicators used in English community nursing are selected and applied, and their perceived usefulness to service users, commissioners and service providers. METHODS: A qualitative multi-site case study was conducted with five commissioning organizations and their...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pollard, Katherine, Horrocks, Sue, Duncan, Lorna, Petsoulas, Christina, Allen, Pauline, Cameron, Ailsa, Cook, Jane, Gibbard, Emma, Harland, Lizanne, Husband, Pete, Loydon, Geoff, McDonald, Ruth, Wye, Lesley, Salisbury, Chris
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7307420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31594393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1355819619868506
_version_ 1783548806015483904
author Pollard, Katherine
Horrocks, Sue
Duncan, Lorna
Petsoulas, Christina
Allen, Pauline
Cameron, Ailsa
Cook, Jane
Gibbard, Emma
Harland, Lizanne
Husband, Pete
Loydon, Geoff
McDonald, Ruth
Wye, Lesley
Salisbury, Chris
author_facet Pollard, Katherine
Horrocks, Sue
Duncan, Lorna
Petsoulas, Christina
Allen, Pauline
Cameron, Ailsa
Cook, Jane
Gibbard, Emma
Harland, Lizanne
Husband, Pete
Loydon, Geoff
McDonald, Ruth
Wye, Lesley
Salisbury, Chris
author_sort Pollard, Katherine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To establish how quality indicators used in English community nursing are selected and applied, and their perceived usefulness to service users, commissioners and service providers. METHODS: A qualitative multi-site case study was conducted with five commissioning organizations and their service providers. Participants included commissioners, provider organization managers, nurses and service users. RESULTS: Indicator selection and application often entail complex processes influenced by wider health system and cross-organizational factors. All participants felt that current indicators, while useful for accountability and management purposes, fail to reflect the true quality of community nursing care and may sometimes indirectly compromise care. CONCLUSIONS: Valuable resources may be better used for comprehensive system redesign, to ensure that patient, carer and nurse priorities are given equivalence with those of other stakeholders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7307420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73074202020-07-06 How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing Pollard, Katherine Horrocks, Sue Duncan, Lorna Petsoulas, Christina Allen, Pauline Cameron, Ailsa Cook, Jane Gibbard, Emma Harland, Lizanne Husband, Pete Loydon, Geoff McDonald, Ruth Wye, Lesley Salisbury, Chris J Health Serv Res Policy Original Research OBJECTIVES: To establish how quality indicators used in English community nursing are selected and applied, and their perceived usefulness to service users, commissioners and service providers. METHODS: A qualitative multi-site case study was conducted with five commissioning organizations and their service providers. Participants included commissioners, provider organization managers, nurses and service users. RESULTS: Indicator selection and application often entail complex processes influenced by wider health system and cross-organizational factors. All participants felt that current indicators, while useful for accountability and management purposes, fail to reflect the true quality of community nursing care and may sometimes indirectly compromise care. CONCLUSIONS: Valuable resources may be better used for comprehensive system redesign, to ensure that patient, carer and nurse priorities are given equivalence with those of other stakeholders. SAGE Publications 2019-10-08 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7307420/ /pubmed/31594393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1355819619868506 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Pollard, Katherine
Horrocks, Sue
Duncan, Lorna
Petsoulas, Christina
Allen, Pauline
Cameron, Ailsa
Cook, Jane
Gibbard, Emma
Harland, Lizanne
Husband, Pete
Loydon, Geoff
McDonald, Ruth
Wye, Lesley
Salisbury, Chris
How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing
title How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing
title_full How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing
title_fullStr How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing
title_full_unstemmed How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing
title_short How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing
title_sort how do they measure up? differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in english community nursing
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7307420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31594393
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1355819619868506
work_keys_str_mv AT pollardkatherine howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing
AT horrockssue howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing
AT duncanlorna howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing
AT petsoulaschristina howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing
AT allenpauline howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing
AT cameronailsa howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing
AT cookjane howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing
AT gibbardemma howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing
AT harlandlizanne howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing
AT husbandpete howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing
AT loydongeoff howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing
AT mcdonaldruth howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing
AT wyelesley howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing
AT salisburychris howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing