Cargando…
How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing
OBJECTIVES: To establish how quality indicators used in English community nursing are selected and applied, and their perceived usefulness to service users, commissioners and service providers. METHODS: A qualitative multi-site case study was conducted with five commissioning organizations and their...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7307420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31594393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1355819619868506 |
_version_ | 1783548806015483904 |
---|---|
author | Pollard, Katherine Horrocks, Sue Duncan, Lorna Petsoulas, Christina Allen, Pauline Cameron, Ailsa Cook, Jane Gibbard, Emma Harland, Lizanne Husband, Pete Loydon, Geoff McDonald, Ruth Wye, Lesley Salisbury, Chris |
author_facet | Pollard, Katherine Horrocks, Sue Duncan, Lorna Petsoulas, Christina Allen, Pauline Cameron, Ailsa Cook, Jane Gibbard, Emma Harland, Lizanne Husband, Pete Loydon, Geoff McDonald, Ruth Wye, Lesley Salisbury, Chris |
author_sort | Pollard, Katherine |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To establish how quality indicators used in English community nursing are selected and applied, and their perceived usefulness to service users, commissioners and service providers. METHODS: A qualitative multi-site case study was conducted with five commissioning organizations and their service providers. Participants included commissioners, provider organization managers, nurses and service users. RESULTS: Indicator selection and application often entail complex processes influenced by wider health system and cross-organizational factors. All participants felt that current indicators, while useful for accountability and management purposes, fail to reflect the true quality of community nursing care and may sometimes indirectly compromise care. CONCLUSIONS: Valuable resources may be better used for comprehensive system redesign, to ensure that patient, carer and nurse priorities are given equivalence with those of other stakeholders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7307420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73074202020-07-06 How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing Pollard, Katherine Horrocks, Sue Duncan, Lorna Petsoulas, Christina Allen, Pauline Cameron, Ailsa Cook, Jane Gibbard, Emma Harland, Lizanne Husband, Pete Loydon, Geoff McDonald, Ruth Wye, Lesley Salisbury, Chris J Health Serv Res Policy Original Research OBJECTIVES: To establish how quality indicators used in English community nursing are selected and applied, and their perceived usefulness to service users, commissioners and service providers. METHODS: A qualitative multi-site case study was conducted with five commissioning organizations and their service providers. Participants included commissioners, provider organization managers, nurses and service users. RESULTS: Indicator selection and application often entail complex processes influenced by wider health system and cross-organizational factors. All participants felt that current indicators, while useful for accountability and management purposes, fail to reflect the true quality of community nursing care and may sometimes indirectly compromise care. CONCLUSIONS: Valuable resources may be better used for comprehensive system redesign, to ensure that patient, carer and nurse priorities are given equivalence with those of other stakeholders. SAGE Publications 2019-10-08 2020-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7307420/ /pubmed/31594393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1355819619868506 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Pollard, Katherine Horrocks, Sue Duncan, Lorna Petsoulas, Christina Allen, Pauline Cameron, Ailsa Cook, Jane Gibbard, Emma Harland, Lizanne Husband, Pete Loydon, Geoff McDonald, Ruth Wye, Lesley Salisbury, Chris How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing |
title | How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing |
title_full | How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing |
title_fullStr | How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing |
title_full_unstemmed | How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing |
title_short | How do they measure up? Differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in English community nursing |
title_sort | how do they measure up? differences in stakeholder perceptions of quality measures used in english community nursing |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7307420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31594393 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1355819619868506 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pollardkatherine howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing AT horrockssue howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing AT duncanlorna howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing AT petsoulaschristina howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing AT allenpauline howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing AT cameronailsa howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing AT cookjane howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing AT gibbardemma howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing AT harlandlizanne howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing AT husbandpete howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing AT loydongeoff howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing AT mcdonaldruth howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing AT wyelesley howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing AT salisburychris howdotheymeasureupdifferencesinstakeholderperceptionsofqualitymeasuresusedinenglishcommunitynursing |