Cargando…
Patient feedback for safety improvement in primary care: results from a feasibility study
OBJECTIVES: Patient involvement in safety improvement is a developing area of research. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a patient feedback on safety intervention in primary care. Specifically, the intervention acceptability, fidelity, implementation enablers and barriers,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7307531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32565479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037887 |
_version_ | 1783548826578059264 |
---|---|
author | Hernan, Andrea L Giles, Sally J Beks, Hannah McNamara, Kevin Kloot, Kate Binder, Marley J Versace, Vincent |
author_facet | Hernan, Andrea L Giles, Sally J Beks, Hannah McNamara, Kevin Kloot, Kate Binder, Marley J Versace, Vincent |
author_sort | Hernan, Andrea L |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Patient involvement in safety improvement is a developing area of research. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a patient feedback on safety intervention in primary care. Specifically, the intervention acceptability, fidelity, implementation enablers and barriers, scalability, and process of systematically collecting safety data were examined. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Mixed-methods feasibility trial with six purposively selected Australian primary care practices. INTERVENTION: The intervention comprised an iterative process with a cycle of measurement, learning, feedback, action planning and implementation period of 6 months. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Qualitative and quantitative data relating to feasibility measures (acceptability, fidelity, enablers, barriers, scalability and process of collecting safety data) were collected and analysed. RESULTS: A total of n=1750 patients provided feedback on safety. There was a statistically significant increase in mean patient safety scores indicating improved safety (4.30–4.37, p=0.002). Staff deemed the intervention acceptable, with minor recommendations for improvement. Intervention fidelity was high and implementation enablers were attributed to the intervention structure and framework, use of intuitive problem-solving approaches, and multidisciplinary team involvement. Practice-based safety interventions resulted in sustainable and measurable changes to systems for safety, such as increased access to care and improved patient information accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that this innovative patient feedback on safety intervention is feasible for scale-up to a larger effectiveness trial and further spread into policy and practice. This intervention complements existing safety improvement strategies and activities, and integrates into current patient feedback service requirements for Australian primary care. Further research is needed to examine the intervention effects on safety incident reduction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7307531 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73075312020-06-23 Patient feedback for safety improvement in primary care: results from a feasibility study Hernan, Andrea L Giles, Sally J Beks, Hannah McNamara, Kevin Kloot, Kate Binder, Marley J Versace, Vincent BMJ Open General practice / Family practice OBJECTIVES: Patient involvement in safety improvement is a developing area of research. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of a patient feedback on safety intervention in primary care. Specifically, the intervention acceptability, fidelity, implementation enablers and barriers, scalability, and process of systematically collecting safety data were examined. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Mixed-methods feasibility trial with six purposively selected Australian primary care practices. INTERVENTION: The intervention comprised an iterative process with a cycle of measurement, learning, feedback, action planning and implementation period of 6 months. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Qualitative and quantitative data relating to feasibility measures (acceptability, fidelity, enablers, barriers, scalability and process of collecting safety data) were collected and analysed. RESULTS: A total of n=1750 patients provided feedback on safety. There was a statistically significant increase in mean patient safety scores indicating improved safety (4.30–4.37, p=0.002). Staff deemed the intervention acceptable, with minor recommendations for improvement. Intervention fidelity was high and implementation enablers were attributed to the intervention structure and framework, use of intuitive problem-solving approaches, and multidisciplinary team involvement. Practice-based safety interventions resulted in sustainable and measurable changes to systems for safety, such as increased access to care and improved patient information accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that this innovative patient feedback on safety intervention is feasible for scale-up to a larger effectiveness trial and further spread into policy and practice. This intervention complements existing safety improvement strategies and activities, and integrates into current patient feedback service requirements for Australian primary care. Further research is needed to examine the intervention effects on safety incident reduction. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7307531/ /pubmed/32565479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037887 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | General practice / Family practice Hernan, Andrea L Giles, Sally J Beks, Hannah McNamara, Kevin Kloot, Kate Binder, Marley J Versace, Vincent Patient feedback for safety improvement in primary care: results from a feasibility study |
title | Patient feedback for safety improvement in primary care: results from a feasibility study |
title_full | Patient feedback for safety improvement in primary care: results from a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Patient feedback for safety improvement in primary care: results from a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient feedback for safety improvement in primary care: results from a feasibility study |
title_short | Patient feedback for safety improvement in primary care: results from a feasibility study |
title_sort | patient feedback for safety improvement in primary care: results from a feasibility study |
topic | General practice / Family practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7307531/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32565479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037887 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hernanandreal patientfeedbackforsafetyimprovementinprimarycareresultsfromafeasibilitystudy AT gilessallyj patientfeedbackforsafetyimprovementinprimarycareresultsfromafeasibilitystudy AT bekshannah patientfeedbackforsafetyimprovementinprimarycareresultsfromafeasibilitystudy AT mcnamarakevin patientfeedbackforsafetyimprovementinprimarycareresultsfromafeasibilitystudy AT klootkate patientfeedbackforsafetyimprovementinprimarycareresultsfromafeasibilitystudy AT bindermarleyj patientfeedbackforsafetyimprovementinprimarycareresultsfromafeasibilitystudy AT versacevincent patientfeedbackforsafetyimprovementinprimarycareresultsfromafeasibilitystudy |