Cargando…

The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols

The advent of random start protocols to shorten the time needed to store oocytes in women with malignancies has represented an important improvement in the field of fertility preservation. However, Randomized Controlled Trials are difficult to implement in this area and available evidence that suppo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Filippi, Francesca, Somigliana, Edgardo, Busnelli, Andrea, Guarneri, Cristina, Noli, Stefania, Restelli, Liliana, Vercellini, Paolo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7308302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32572130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67151-x
_version_ 1783548961692319744
author Filippi, Francesca
Somigliana, Edgardo
Busnelli, Andrea
Guarneri, Cristina
Noli, Stefania
Restelli, Liliana
Vercellini, Paolo
author_facet Filippi, Francesca
Somigliana, Edgardo
Busnelli, Andrea
Guarneri, Cristina
Noli, Stefania
Restelli, Liliana
Vercellini, Paolo
author_sort Filippi, Francesca
collection PubMed
description The advent of random start protocols to shorten the time needed to store oocytes in women with malignancies has represented an important improvement in the field of fertility preservation. However, Randomized Controlled Trials are difficult to implement in this area and available evidence that supports this approach remains modest. To shed more light on this issue, we compared the follicular development between the ovary carrying the dominant follicle or the corpus luteum and the contralateral resting ovary in 90 women who underwent random start controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). In fact, ovarian response did not differ between the two ovaries. Subgroup analyses according to the phase of the cycle at the initiation of COS, the type of malignancy, the use of letrozole and the magnitude of the ovarian response did not allow to identify any condition showing a difference in the follicular response between the active and the resting ovaries. In conclusion, follicular growth does not seem to be perturbed by the presence of a dominant follicle or a corpus luteum.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7308302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73083022020-06-23 The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols Filippi, Francesca Somigliana, Edgardo Busnelli, Andrea Guarneri, Cristina Noli, Stefania Restelli, Liliana Vercellini, Paolo Sci Rep Article The advent of random start protocols to shorten the time needed to store oocytes in women with malignancies has represented an important improvement in the field of fertility preservation. However, Randomized Controlled Trials are difficult to implement in this area and available evidence that supports this approach remains modest. To shed more light on this issue, we compared the follicular development between the ovary carrying the dominant follicle or the corpus luteum and the contralateral resting ovary in 90 women who underwent random start controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). In fact, ovarian response did not differ between the two ovaries. Subgroup analyses according to the phase of the cycle at the initiation of COS, the type of malignancy, the use of letrozole and the magnitude of the ovarian response did not allow to identify any condition showing a difference in the follicular response between the active and the resting ovaries. In conclusion, follicular growth does not seem to be perturbed by the presence of a dominant follicle or a corpus luteum. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7308302/ /pubmed/32572130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67151-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Filippi, Francesca
Somigliana, Edgardo
Busnelli, Andrea
Guarneri, Cristina
Noli, Stefania
Restelli, Liliana
Vercellini, Paolo
The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols
title The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols
title_full The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols
title_fullStr The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols
title_full_unstemmed The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols
title_short The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols
title_sort presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7308302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32572130
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67151-x
work_keys_str_mv AT filippifrancesca thepresenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols
AT somiglianaedgardo thepresenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols
AT busnelliandrea thepresenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols
AT guarnericristina thepresenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols
AT nolistefania thepresenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols
AT restellililiana thepresenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols
AT vercellinipaolo thepresenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols
AT filippifrancesca presenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols
AT somiglianaedgardo presenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols
AT busnelliandrea presenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols
AT guarnericristina presenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols
AT nolistefania presenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols
AT restellililiana presenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols
AT vercellinipaolo presenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols