Cargando…
The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols
The advent of random start protocols to shorten the time needed to store oocytes in women with malignancies has represented an important improvement in the field of fertility preservation. However, Randomized Controlled Trials are difficult to implement in this area and available evidence that suppo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7308302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32572130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67151-x |
_version_ | 1783548961692319744 |
---|---|
author | Filippi, Francesca Somigliana, Edgardo Busnelli, Andrea Guarneri, Cristina Noli, Stefania Restelli, Liliana Vercellini, Paolo |
author_facet | Filippi, Francesca Somigliana, Edgardo Busnelli, Andrea Guarneri, Cristina Noli, Stefania Restelli, Liliana Vercellini, Paolo |
author_sort | Filippi, Francesca |
collection | PubMed |
description | The advent of random start protocols to shorten the time needed to store oocytes in women with malignancies has represented an important improvement in the field of fertility preservation. However, Randomized Controlled Trials are difficult to implement in this area and available evidence that supports this approach remains modest. To shed more light on this issue, we compared the follicular development between the ovary carrying the dominant follicle or the corpus luteum and the contralateral resting ovary in 90 women who underwent random start controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). In fact, ovarian response did not differ between the two ovaries. Subgroup analyses according to the phase of the cycle at the initiation of COS, the type of malignancy, the use of letrozole and the magnitude of the ovarian response did not allow to identify any condition showing a difference in the follicular response between the active and the resting ovaries. In conclusion, follicular growth does not seem to be perturbed by the presence of a dominant follicle or a corpus luteum. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7308302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73083022020-06-23 The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols Filippi, Francesca Somigliana, Edgardo Busnelli, Andrea Guarneri, Cristina Noli, Stefania Restelli, Liliana Vercellini, Paolo Sci Rep Article The advent of random start protocols to shorten the time needed to store oocytes in women with malignancies has represented an important improvement in the field of fertility preservation. However, Randomized Controlled Trials are difficult to implement in this area and available evidence that supports this approach remains modest. To shed more light on this issue, we compared the follicular development between the ovary carrying the dominant follicle or the corpus luteum and the contralateral resting ovary in 90 women who underwent random start controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). In fact, ovarian response did not differ between the two ovaries. Subgroup analyses according to the phase of the cycle at the initiation of COS, the type of malignancy, the use of letrozole and the magnitude of the ovarian response did not allow to identify any condition showing a difference in the follicular response between the active and the resting ovaries. In conclusion, follicular growth does not seem to be perturbed by the presence of a dominant follicle or a corpus luteum. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7308302/ /pubmed/32572130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67151-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Filippi, Francesca Somigliana, Edgardo Busnelli, Andrea Guarneri, Cristina Noli, Stefania Restelli, Liliana Vercellini, Paolo The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols |
title | The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols |
title_full | The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols |
title_fullStr | The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols |
title_full_unstemmed | The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols |
title_short | The presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols |
title_sort | presence of dominant follicles and corpora lutea does not perturb response to controlled ovarian stimulation in random start protocols |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7308302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32572130 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67151-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT filippifrancesca thepresenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols AT somiglianaedgardo thepresenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols AT busnelliandrea thepresenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols AT guarnericristina thepresenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols AT nolistefania thepresenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols AT restellililiana thepresenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols AT vercellinipaolo thepresenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols AT filippifrancesca presenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols AT somiglianaedgardo presenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols AT busnelliandrea presenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols AT guarnericristina presenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols AT nolistefania presenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols AT restellililiana presenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols AT vercellinipaolo presenceofdominantfolliclesandcorporaluteadoesnotperturbresponsetocontrolledovarianstimulationinrandomstartprotocols |