Cargando…

A feasibility study of conducting surveillance for swine pathogens in slurry from North Carolina swine farms

Despite close contact between humans and animals on large scale farms, little to no infectious disease research is conducted at this interface. Our goal in this preliminary study was to explore if we could detect swine pathogens using a non-invasive, indirect approach through the study of swine slur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bailey, Emily S., Borkenhagen, Laura K., Choi, Jessica Y., Greer, Annette E., Culhane, Marie R., Gray, Gregory C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7308328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32572119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67313-x
_version_ 1783548967693320192
author Bailey, Emily S.
Borkenhagen, Laura K.
Choi, Jessica Y.
Greer, Annette E.
Culhane, Marie R.
Gray, Gregory C.
author_facet Bailey, Emily S.
Borkenhagen, Laura K.
Choi, Jessica Y.
Greer, Annette E.
Culhane, Marie R.
Gray, Gregory C.
author_sort Bailey, Emily S.
collection PubMed
description Despite close contact between humans and animals on large scale farms, little to no infectious disease research is conducted at this interface. Our goal in this preliminary study was to explore if we could detect swine pathogens using a non-invasive, indirect approach through the study of swine slurry. From April to November 2018, 105 swine slurry samples were collected by farm personnel from waste pits at two sites on a swine farm in North Carolina. These samples were tested for DNA and RNA viruses using a real-time PCR and RT-PCR. Statistical analyses were performed to measure association between virus positive outcomes and potential predictors such as date of sample collection, weight of pigs, number of pigs in barn, temperature, and weather conditions. Overall, 86% of the samples had evidence of at least one of the targeted viruses. Ultimately, this study demonstrated the utility of conducting noninvasive surveillance for swine pathogens through the study of swine slurry. Such swine slurry surveillance may supplant the need to handle, restrain, and collect specimens directly from pigs thus providing an approach to emerging pathogen detection that appeals to the swine industry.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7308328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73083282020-06-23 A feasibility study of conducting surveillance for swine pathogens in slurry from North Carolina swine farms Bailey, Emily S. Borkenhagen, Laura K. Choi, Jessica Y. Greer, Annette E. Culhane, Marie R. Gray, Gregory C. Sci Rep Article Despite close contact between humans and animals on large scale farms, little to no infectious disease research is conducted at this interface. Our goal in this preliminary study was to explore if we could detect swine pathogens using a non-invasive, indirect approach through the study of swine slurry. From April to November 2018, 105 swine slurry samples were collected by farm personnel from waste pits at two sites on a swine farm in North Carolina. These samples were tested for DNA and RNA viruses using a real-time PCR and RT-PCR. Statistical analyses were performed to measure association between virus positive outcomes and potential predictors such as date of sample collection, weight of pigs, number of pigs in barn, temperature, and weather conditions. Overall, 86% of the samples had evidence of at least one of the targeted viruses. Ultimately, this study demonstrated the utility of conducting noninvasive surveillance for swine pathogens through the study of swine slurry. Such swine slurry surveillance may supplant the need to handle, restrain, and collect specimens directly from pigs thus providing an approach to emerging pathogen detection that appeals to the swine industry. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7308328/ /pubmed/32572119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67313-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Bailey, Emily S.
Borkenhagen, Laura K.
Choi, Jessica Y.
Greer, Annette E.
Culhane, Marie R.
Gray, Gregory C.
A feasibility study of conducting surveillance for swine pathogens in slurry from North Carolina swine farms
title A feasibility study of conducting surveillance for swine pathogens in slurry from North Carolina swine farms
title_full A feasibility study of conducting surveillance for swine pathogens in slurry from North Carolina swine farms
title_fullStr A feasibility study of conducting surveillance for swine pathogens in slurry from North Carolina swine farms
title_full_unstemmed A feasibility study of conducting surveillance for swine pathogens in slurry from North Carolina swine farms
title_short A feasibility study of conducting surveillance for swine pathogens in slurry from North Carolina swine farms
title_sort feasibility study of conducting surveillance for swine pathogens in slurry from north carolina swine farms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7308328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32572119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67313-x
work_keys_str_mv AT baileyemilys afeasibilitystudyofconductingsurveillanceforswinepathogensinslurryfromnorthcarolinaswinefarms
AT borkenhagenlaurak afeasibilitystudyofconductingsurveillanceforswinepathogensinslurryfromnorthcarolinaswinefarms
AT choijessicay afeasibilitystudyofconductingsurveillanceforswinepathogensinslurryfromnorthcarolinaswinefarms
AT greerannettee afeasibilitystudyofconductingsurveillanceforswinepathogensinslurryfromnorthcarolinaswinefarms
AT culhanemarier afeasibilitystudyofconductingsurveillanceforswinepathogensinslurryfromnorthcarolinaswinefarms
AT graygregoryc afeasibilitystudyofconductingsurveillanceforswinepathogensinslurryfromnorthcarolinaswinefarms
AT baileyemilys feasibilitystudyofconductingsurveillanceforswinepathogensinslurryfromnorthcarolinaswinefarms
AT borkenhagenlaurak feasibilitystudyofconductingsurveillanceforswinepathogensinslurryfromnorthcarolinaswinefarms
AT choijessicay feasibilitystudyofconductingsurveillanceforswinepathogensinslurryfromnorthcarolinaswinefarms
AT greerannettee feasibilitystudyofconductingsurveillanceforswinepathogensinslurryfromnorthcarolinaswinefarms
AT culhanemarier feasibilitystudyofconductingsurveillanceforswinepathogensinslurryfromnorthcarolinaswinefarms
AT graygregoryc feasibilitystudyofconductingsurveillanceforswinepathogensinslurryfromnorthcarolinaswinefarms