Cargando…

Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials

Touch plays a crucial role in humans’ nonverbal social and affective communication. It then comes as no surprise to observe a considerable effort that has been placed on devising methodologies for automated touch classification. For instance, such an ability allows for the use of smart touch sensors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keshmiri, Soheil, Shiomi, Masahiro, Sumioka, Hidenobu, Minato, Takashi, Ishiguro, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7309164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32471082
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20113033
_version_ 1783549160899739648
author Keshmiri, Soheil
Shiomi, Masahiro
Sumioka, Hidenobu
Minato, Takashi
Ishiguro, Hiroshi
author_facet Keshmiri, Soheil
Shiomi, Masahiro
Sumioka, Hidenobu
Minato, Takashi
Ishiguro, Hiroshi
author_sort Keshmiri, Soheil
collection PubMed
description Touch plays a crucial role in humans’ nonverbal social and affective communication. It then comes as no surprise to observe a considerable effort that has been placed on devising methodologies for automated touch classification. For instance, such an ability allows for the use of smart touch sensors in such real-life application domains as socially-assistive robots and embodied telecommunication. In fact, touch classification literature represents an undeniably progressive result. However, these results are limited in two important ways. First, they are mostly based on overall (i.e., average) accuracy of different classifiers. As a result, they fall short in providing an insight on performance of these approaches as per different types of touch. Second, they do not consider the same type of touch with different level of strength (e.g., gentle versus strong touch). This is certainly an important factor that deserves investigating since the intensity of a touch can utterly transform its meaning (e.g., from an affectionate gesture to a sign of punishment). The current study provides a preliminary investigation of these shortcomings by considering the accuracy of a number of classifiers for both, within- (i.e., same type of touch with differing strengths) and between-touch (i.e., different types of touch) classifications. Our results help verify the strength and shortcoming of different machine learning algorithms for touch classification. They also highlight some of the challenges whose solution concepts can pave the path for integration of touch sensors in such application domains as human–robot interaction (HRI).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7309164
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73091642020-06-25 Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials Keshmiri, Soheil Shiomi, Masahiro Sumioka, Hidenobu Minato, Takashi Ishiguro, Hiroshi Sensors (Basel) Article Touch plays a crucial role in humans’ nonverbal social and affective communication. It then comes as no surprise to observe a considerable effort that has been placed on devising methodologies for automated touch classification. For instance, such an ability allows for the use of smart touch sensors in such real-life application domains as socially-assistive robots and embodied telecommunication. In fact, touch classification literature represents an undeniably progressive result. However, these results are limited in two important ways. First, they are mostly based on overall (i.e., average) accuracy of different classifiers. As a result, they fall short in providing an insight on performance of these approaches as per different types of touch. Second, they do not consider the same type of touch with different level of strength (e.g., gentle versus strong touch). This is certainly an important factor that deserves investigating since the intensity of a touch can utterly transform its meaning (e.g., from an affectionate gesture to a sign of punishment). The current study provides a preliminary investigation of these shortcomings by considering the accuracy of a number of classifiers for both, within- (i.e., same type of touch with differing strengths) and between-touch (i.e., different types of touch) classifications. Our results help verify the strength and shortcoming of different machine learning algorithms for touch classification. They also highlight some of the challenges whose solution concepts can pave the path for integration of touch sensors in such application domains as human–robot interaction (HRI). MDPI 2020-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7309164/ /pubmed/32471082 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20113033 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Keshmiri, Soheil
Shiomi, Masahiro
Sumioka, Hidenobu
Minato, Takashi
Ishiguro, Hiroshi
Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials
title Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials
title_full Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials
title_fullStr Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials
title_full_unstemmed Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials
title_short Gentle Versus Strong Touch Classification: Preliminary Results, Challenges, and Potentials
title_sort gentle versus strong touch classification: preliminary results, challenges, and potentials
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7309164/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32471082
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20113033
work_keys_str_mv AT keshmirisoheil gentleversusstrongtouchclassificationpreliminaryresultschallengesandpotentials
AT shiomimasahiro gentleversusstrongtouchclassificationpreliminaryresultschallengesandpotentials
AT sumiokahidenobu gentleversusstrongtouchclassificationpreliminaryresultschallengesandpotentials
AT minatotakashi gentleversusstrongtouchclassificationpreliminaryresultschallengesandpotentials
AT ishigurohiroshi gentleversusstrongtouchclassificationpreliminaryresultschallengesandpotentials