Cargando…
National monitoring and evaluation of eHealth: a scoping review
OBJECTIVE: There has been substantial growth in eHealth over the past decade, driven by expectations of improved healthcare system performance. Despite substantial eHealth investment, little is known about the monitoring and evaluation strategies for gauging progress in eHealth availability and use....
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7309231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz071 |
_version_ | 1783549172731871232 |
---|---|
author | Villumsen, Sidsel Adler-Milstein, Julia Nøhr, Christian |
author_facet | Villumsen, Sidsel Adler-Milstein, Julia Nøhr, Christian |
author_sort | Villumsen, Sidsel |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: There has been substantial growth in eHealth over the past decade, driven by expectations of improved healthcare system performance. Despite substantial eHealth investment, little is known about the monitoring and evaluation strategies for gauging progress in eHealth availability and use. This scoping review aims to map the existing literature and depict the predominant approaches and methodological recommendations to national and regional monitoring and evaluation of eHealth availability and use, to advance national strategies for monitoring and evaluating eHealth. METHODS: Peer-reviewed and grey literature on monitoring and evaluation of eHealth availability and use published between January 1, 2009, and March 11, 2019, were eligible for inclusion. A total of 2354 publications were identified and 36 publications were included after full-text review. Data on publication type (eg, empirical research), country, level (national or regional), publication year, method (eg, survey), and domain (eg, provider-centric electronic record) were charted. RESULTS: The majority of publications monitored availability alone or applied a combination of availability and use measures. Surveys were the most common data collection method (used in 86% of the publications). Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), European Commission, Canada Health Infoway, and World Health Organization (WHO) have developed comprehensive eHealth monitoring and evaluation methodology recommendations. DISCUSSION: Establishing continuous national eHealth monitoring and evaluation, based on international approaches and recommendations, could improve the ability for cross-country benchmarking and learning. This scoping review provides an overview of the predominant approaches to and recommendations for national and regional monitoring and evaluation of eHealth. It thereby provides a starting point for developing national eHealth monitoring strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7309231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73092312020-06-29 National monitoring and evaluation of eHealth: a scoping review Villumsen, Sidsel Adler-Milstein, Julia Nøhr, Christian JAMIA Open Reviews OBJECTIVE: There has been substantial growth in eHealth over the past decade, driven by expectations of improved healthcare system performance. Despite substantial eHealth investment, little is known about the monitoring and evaluation strategies for gauging progress in eHealth availability and use. This scoping review aims to map the existing literature and depict the predominant approaches and methodological recommendations to national and regional monitoring and evaluation of eHealth availability and use, to advance national strategies for monitoring and evaluating eHealth. METHODS: Peer-reviewed and grey literature on monitoring and evaluation of eHealth availability and use published between January 1, 2009, and March 11, 2019, were eligible for inclusion. A total of 2354 publications were identified and 36 publications were included after full-text review. Data on publication type (eg, empirical research), country, level (national or regional), publication year, method (eg, survey), and domain (eg, provider-centric electronic record) were charted. RESULTS: The majority of publications monitored availability alone or applied a combination of availability and use measures. Surveys were the most common data collection method (used in 86% of the publications). Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), European Commission, Canada Health Infoway, and World Health Organization (WHO) have developed comprehensive eHealth monitoring and evaluation methodology recommendations. DISCUSSION: Establishing continuous national eHealth monitoring and evaluation, based on international approaches and recommendations, could improve the ability for cross-country benchmarking and learning. This scoping review provides an overview of the predominant approaches to and recommendations for national and regional monitoring and evaluation of eHealth. It thereby provides a starting point for developing national eHealth monitoring strategies. Oxford University Press 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7309231/ /pubmed/32607495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz071 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Villumsen, Sidsel Adler-Milstein, Julia Nøhr, Christian National monitoring and evaluation of eHealth: a scoping review |
title | National monitoring and evaluation of eHealth: a scoping review |
title_full | National monitoring and evaluation of eHealth: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | National monitoring and evaluation of eHealth: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | National monitoring and evaluation of eHealth: a scoping review |
title_short | National monitoring and evaluation of eHealth: a scoping review |
title_sort | national monitoring and evaluation of ehealth: a scoping review |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7309231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32607495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz071 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT villumsensidsel nationalmonitoringandevaluationofehealthascopingreview AT adlermilsteinjulia nationalmonitoringandevaluationofehealthascopingreview AT nøhrchristian nationalmonitoringandevaluationofehealthascopingreview |