Cargando…
Health technology assessment capacity at national level in sub-Saharan Africa: an initial survey of stakeholders
Background: Health technology assessment (HTA) is an effective tool for supporting priority setting (PS) in health. Stakeholder groups need to understand HTA appropriate to their role and to interpret and critique the evidence produced. We aimed to rapidly assess current health system priorities and...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7309411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595957 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23263.2 |
_version_ | 1783549200498163712 |
---|---|
author | Hollingworth, Samantha A. Ruiz, Francis Gad, Mohamed Chalkidou, Kalipso |
author_facet | Hollingworth, Samantha A. Ruiz, Francis Gad, Mohamed Chalkidou, Kalipso |
author_sort | Hollingworth, Samantha A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Health technology assessment (HTA) is an effective tool for supporting priority setting (PS) in health. Stakeholder groups need to understand HTA appropriate to their role and to interpret and critique the evidence produced. We aimed to rapidly assess current health system priorities and policy areas of demand for HTA in Sub-Saharan Africa, and identify key gaps in data and skills to inform targeted capacity building. Methods: We revised an existing survey, delivered it to 357 participants, then analysed responses and explored key themes. Results: There were 51 respondents (14%, 30 full completions) across 14 countries. HTA was considered an important and valuable PS tool with a key role in the design of health benefits packages, clinical guideline development, and service improvement. Medicines were identified as a technology type that would especially benefit from the application of HTA. Using HTA to address safety issues (e.g. low-quality medicines) and value for money concerns was particularly highlighted. The perceived availability and accessibility of suitable local data to support HTA varied widely but was mostly considered inadequate and limited. Respondents also noted a need for training support in research methodology and data gathering. Conclusions: While important in raising awareness of HTA as a tool for PS, this study had a low response rate, and that respondents were self-selected. A more refined survey will be developed to support engagement strategies and capacity building. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7309411 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | F1000 Research Limited |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73094112020-06-25 Health technology assessment capacity at national level in sub-Saharan Africa: an initial survey of stakeholders Hollingworth, Samantha A. Ruiz, Francis Gad, Mohamed Chalkidou, Kalipso F1000Res Brief Report Background: Health technology assessment (HTA) is an effective tool for supporting priority setting (PS) in health. Stakeholder groups need to understand HTA appropriate to their role and to interpret and critique the evidence produced. We aimed to rapidly assess current health system priorities and policy areas of demand for HTA in Sub-Saharan Africa, and identify key gaps in data and skills to inform targeted capacity building. Methods: We revised an existing survey, delivered it to 357 participants, then analysed responses and explored key themes. Results: There were 51 respondents (14%, 30 full completions) across 14 countries. HTA was considered an important and valuable PS tool with a key role in the design of health benefits packages, clinical guideline development, and service improvement. Medicines were identified as a technology type that would especially benefit from the application of HTA. Using HTA to address safety issues (e.g. low-quality medicines) and value for money concerns was particularly highlighted. The perceived availability and accessibility of suitable local data to support HTA varied widely but was mostly considered inadequate and limited. Respondents also noted a need for training support in research methodology and data gathering. Conclusions: While important in raising awareness of HTA as a tool for PS, this study had a low response rate, and that respondents were self-selected. A more refined survey will be developed to support engagement strategies and capacity building. F1000 Research Limited 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7309411/ /pubmed/32595957 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23263.2 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Hollingworth SA et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Hollingworth, Samantha A. Ruiz, Francis Gad, Mohamed Chalkidou, Kalipso Health technology assessment capacity at national level in sub-Saharan Africa: an initial survey of stakeholders |
title | Health technology assessment capacity at national level in sub-Saharan Africa: an initial survey of stakeholders |
title_full | Health technology assessment capacity at national level in sub-Saharan Africa: an initial survey of stakeholders |
title_fullStr | Health technology assessment capacity at national level in sub-Saharan Africa: an initial survey of stakeholders |
title_full_unstemmed | Health technology assessment capacity at national level in sub-Saharan Africa: an initial survey of stakeholders |
title_short | Health technology assessment capacity at national level in sub-Saharan Africa: an initial survey of stakeholders |
title_sort | health technology assessment capacity at national level in sub-saharan africa: an initial survey of stakeholders |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7309411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32595957 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.23263.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hollingworthsamanthaa healthtechnologyassessmentcapacityatnationallevelinsubsaharanafricaaninitialsurveyofstakeholders AT ruizfrancis healthtechnologyassessmentcapacityatnationallevelinsubsaharanafricaaninitialsurveyofstakeholders AT gadmohamed healthtechnologyassessmentcapacityatnationallevelinsubsaharanafricaaninitialsurveyofstakeholders AT chalkidoukalipso healthtechnologyassessmentcapacityatnationallevelinsubsaharanafricaaninitialsurveyofstakeholders |