Cargando…
A case study of using the He Pikinga Waiora Implementation Framework: challenges and successes in implementing a twelve-week lifestyle intervention to reduce weight in Māori men at risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity
BACKGROUND: Māori men have stark health inequities around non-communicable diseases. This study describes the case of a partnership attempting to develop and implement a culturally centred intervention through a collaborative partnership to potentially address the inequities. In particular, the part...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32571330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01222-3 |
_version_ | 1783549291798724608 |
---|---|
author | Oetzel, John Rarere, Moana Wihapi, Ray Manuel, Carey Tapsell, Jade |
author_facet | Oetzel, John Rarere, Moana Wihapi, Ray Manuel, Carey Tapsell, Jade |
author_sort | Oetzel, John |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Māori men have stark health inequities around non-communicable diseases. This study describes the case of a partnership attempting to develop and implement a culturally centred intervention through a collaborative partnership to potentially address the inequities. In particular, the partnership followed a participatory, co-design approach using the He Pikinga Waiora (HPW) Implementation Framework; the study presents lessons learnt in addressing health inequities following this framework. METHODS: The partnership involved a university research team and a Māori community health provider. They engaged with other stakeholders and several cohorts of Māori men through a co-design process to adapt a 12-week lifestyle intervention. The co-design process was documented through meeting notes and interviews with partners. Two cohorts participated in separate single group pre-intervention/post-intervention designs with multi-method data collection. Key outcome measures included weight loss, self-reported health, physical activity, and nutrition. Post-intervention data collection included qualitative data. RESULTS: The co-design process resulted in a strong and engaged partnership between the university team and the provider. There were significant challenges in implementing the intervention including having two additional partner organisations dropping out of the partnership just after the initial implementation phase. However, a flexible and adaptable partnership resulted in developing two distinct lifestyle interventions run with 32 Māori men (in two different cohorts of 8 and 24). All but one in the first cohort completed the programme. The first cohort had a modest although statistically insignificant improvement in weight loss (d = 1.04) and body mass index (BMI; d = 1.08). The second cohort had a significant reduction in weight loss (d = 1.16) and BMI (d = 1.15). They also had a significant increase in health-related quality of life (d = 1.7) and self-rated health (d = 2.0). CONCLUSION: The HPW Framework appears to be well suited to advance implementation science for Indigenous communities in general and Māori in particular. The framework has promise as a policy and planning tool to evaluate and design interventions for chronic disease prevention in Indigenous communities. Despite this promise, there are structural challenges in developing and implementing interventions to address health inequities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered, Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12619001783112. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7310040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73100402020-06-23 A case study of using the He Pikinga Waiora Implementation Framework: challenges and successes in implementing a twelve-week lifestyle intervention to reduce weight in Māori men at risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity Oetzel, John Rarere, Moana Wihapi, Ray Manuel, Carey Tapsell, Jade Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: Māori men have stark health inequities around non-communicable diseases. This study describes the case of a partnership attempting to develop and implement a culturally centred intervention through a collaborative partnership to potentially address the inequities. In particular, the partnership followed a participatory, co-design approach using the He Pikinga Waiora (HPW) Implementation Framework; the study presents lessons learnt in addressing health inequities following this framework. METHODS: The partnership involved a university research team and a Māori community health provider. They engaged with other stakeholders and several cohorts of Māori men through a co-design process to adapt a 12-week lifestyle intervention. The co-design process was documented through meeting notes and interviews with partners. Two cohorts participated in separate single group pre-intervention/post-intervention designs with multi-method data collection. Key outcome measures included weight loss, self-reported health, physical activity, and nutrition. Post-intervention data collection included qualitative data. RESULTS: The co-design process resulted in a strong and engaged partnership between the university team and the provider. There were significant challenges in implementing the intervention including having two additional partner organisations dropping out of the partnership just after the initial implementation phase. However, a flexible and adaptable partnership resulted in developing two distinct lifestyle interventions run with 32 Māori men (in two different cohorts of 8 and 24). All but one in the first cohort completed the programme. The first cohort had a modest although statistically insignificant improvement in weight loss (d = 1.04) and body mass index (BMI; d = 1.08). The second cohort had a significant reduction in weight loss (d = 1.16) and BMI (d = 1.15). They also had a significant increase in health-related quality of life (d = 1.7) and self-rated health (d = 2.0). CONCLUSION: The HPW Framework appears to be well suited to advance implementation science for Indigenous communities in general and Māori in particular. The framework has promise as a policy and planning tool to evaluate and design interventions for chronic disease prevention in Indigenous communities. Despite this promise, there are structural challenges in developing and implementing interventions to address health inequities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered, Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12619001783112. BioMed Central 2020-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7310040/ /pubmed/32571330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01222-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Oetzel, John Rarere, Moana Wihapi, Ray Manuel, Carey Tapsell, Jade A case study of using the He Pikinga Waiora Implementation Framework: challenges and successes in implementing a twelve-week lifestyle intervention to reduce weight in Māori men at risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity |
title | A case study of using the He Pikinga Waiora Implementation Framework: challenges and successes in implementing a twelve-week lifestyle intervention to reduce weight in Māori men at risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity |
title_full | A case study of using the He Pikinga Waiora Implementation Framework: challenges and successes in implementing a twelve-week lifestyle intervention to reduce weight in Māori men at risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity |
title_fullStr | A case study of using the He Pikinga Waiora Implementation Framework: challenges and successes in implementing a twelve-week lifestyle intervention to reduce weight in Māori men at risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity |
title_full_unstemmed | A case study of using the He Pikinga Waiora Implementation Framework: challenges and successes in implementing a twelve-week lifestyle intervention to reduce weight in Māori men at risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity |
title_short | A case study of using the He Pikinga Waiora Implementation Framework: challenges and successes in implementing a twelve-week lifestyle intervention to reduce weight in Māori men at risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity |
title_sort | case study of using the he pikinga waiora implementation framework: challenges and successes in implementing a twelve-week lifestyle intervention to reduce weight in māori men at risk of diabetes, cardiovascular disease and obesity |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32571330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01222-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oetzeljohn acasestudyofusingthehepikingawaioraimplementationframeworkchallengesandsuccessesinimplementingatwelveweeklifestyleinterventiontoreduceweightinmaorimenatriskofdiabetescardiovasculardiseaseandobesity AT rareremoana acasestudyofusingthehepikingawaioraimplementationframeworkchallengesandsuccessesinimplementingatwelveweeklifestyleinterventiontoreduceweightinmaorimenatriskofdiabetescardiovasculardiseaseandobesity AT wihapiray acasestudyofusingthehepikingawaioraimplementationframeworkchallengesandsuccessesinimplementingatwelveweeklifestyleinterventiontoreduceweightinmaorimenatriskofdiabetescardiovasculardiseaseandobesity AT manuelcarey acasestudyofusingthehepikingawaioraimplementationframeworkchallengesandsuccessesinimplementingatwelveweeklifestyleinterventiontoreduceweightinmaorimenatriskofdiabetescardiovasculardiseaseandobesity AT tapselljade acasestudyofusingthehepikingawaioraimplementationframeworkchallengesandsuccessesinimplementingatwelveweeklifestyleinterventiontoreduceweightinmaorimenatriskofdiabetescardiovasculardiseaseandobesity AT oetzeljohn casestudyofusingthehepikingawaioraimplementationframeworkchallengesandsuccessesinimplementingatwelveweeklifestyleinterventiontoreduceweightinmaorimenatriskofdiabetescardiovasculardiseaseandobesity AT rareremoana casestudyofusingthehepikingawaioraimplementationframeworkchallengesandsuccessesinimplementingatwelveweeklifestyleinterventiontoreduceweightinmaorimenatriskofdiabetescardiovasculardiseaseandobesity AT wihapiray casestudyofusingthehepikingawaioraimplementationframeworkchallengesandsuccessesinimplementingatwelveweeklifestyleinterventiontoreduceweightinmaorimenatriskofdiabetescardiovasculardiseaseandobesity AT manuelcarey casestudyofusingthehepikingawaioraimplementationframeworkchallengesandsuccessesinimplementingatwelveweeklifestyleinterventiontoreduceweightinmaorimenatriskofdiabetescardiovasculardiseaseandobesity AT tapselljade casestudyofusingthehepikingawaioraimplementationframeworkchallengesandsuccessesinimplementingatwelveweeklifestyleinterventiontoreduceweightinmaorimenatriskofdiabetescardiovasculardiseaseandobesity |