Cargando…
Can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest?
BACKGROUND: Refractory cardiac arrest resistant to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-CPR) has a poor outcome. Although previous reports showed that extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) can improve the clinical outcome, there are no clinically applicable predictors of pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00753-6 |
_version_ | 1783549379085336576 |
---|---|
author | Siao, Fu-Yuan Chiu, Chun-Wen Chiu, Chun-Chieh Chang, Yu-Jun Chen, Ying-Chen Chen, Yao-Li Hsieh, Yung-Kun Chou, Chu-Chung Yen, Hsu-Hen |
author_facet | Siao, Fu-Yuan Chiu, Chun-Wen Chiu, Chun-Chieh Chang, Yu-Jun Chen, Ying-Chen Chen, Yao-Li Hsieh, Yung-Kun Chou, Chu-Chung Yen, Hsu-Hen |
author_sort | Siao, Fu-Yuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Refractory cardiac arrest resistant to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-CPR) has a poor outcome. Although previous reports showed that extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) can improve the clinical outcome, there are no clinically applicable predictors of patient outcome that can be used prior to the implementation of E-CPR. We aimed to evaluate the use of clinical factors in patients with refractory cardiac arrest undergoing E-CPR to predict patient outcome in our institution. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study. We report 112 patients presenting with refractory cardiac arrest resistant to C-CPR between January 2012 and November 2017. All patients received E-CPR for continued life support when a cardiogenic etiology was presumed. Clinical factors associated with patient outcome were analyzed. Significant pre-ECMO clinical factors were extracted to build a patient outcome risk prediction model. RESULTS: The overall survival rate at discharge was 40.2, and 30.4% of patients were discharged with good neurologic function. The six-month survival rate after hospital discharge was 36.6, and 25.9% of patients had good neurologic function 6 months after discharge. We stratified the patients into low-risk (n = 38), medium-risk (n = 47), and high-risk groups (n = 27) according to the TLR score (low-flow Time, cardiac arrest Location, and initial cardiac arrest Rhythm) that we derived from pre-ECMO clinical parameters. Compared with the medium-risk and high-risk groups, the low-risk group had better survival at discharge (65.8% vs. 42.6% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001) and at 6 months (60.5% vs. 38.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.0001). The low-risk group also had a better neurologic outcome at discharge (50% vs. 31.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.0001) and 6 months after discharge (44.7% vs. 25.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.0003) than the medium-risk and high-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with refractory cardiac arrest receiving E-CPR can be stratified by pre-ECMO clinical factors to predict the clinical outcome. Larger-scale studies are required to validate our observations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7310513 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73105132020-06-23 Can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest? Siao, Fu-Yuan Chiu, Chun-Wen Chiu, Chun-Chieh Chang, Yu-Jun Chen, Ying-Chen Chen, Yao-Li Hsieh, Yung-Kun Chou, Chu-Chung Yen, Hsu-Hen Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Refractory cardiac arrest resistant to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-CPR) has a poor outcome. Although previous reports showed that extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) can improve the clinical outcome, there are no clinically applicable predictors of patient outcome that can be used prior to the implementation of E-CPR. We aimed to evaluate the use of clinical factors in patients with refractory cardiac arrest undergoing E-CPR to predict patient outcome in our institution. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study. We report 112 patients presenting with refractory cardiac arrest resistant to C-CPR between January 2012 and November 2017. All patients received E-CPR for continued life support when a cardiogenic etiology was presumed. Clinical factors associated with patient outcome were analyzed. Significant pre-ECMO clinical factors were extracted to build a patient outcome risk prediction model. RESULTS: The overall survival rate at discharge was 40.2, and 30.4% of patients were discharged with good neurologic function. The six-month survival rate after hospital discharge was 36.6, and 25.9% of patients had good neurologic function 6 months after discharge. We stratified the patients into low-risk (n = 38), medium-risk (n = 47), and high-risk groups (n = 27) according to the TLR score (low-flow Time, cardiac arrest Location, and initial cardiac arrest Rhythm) that we derived from pre-ECMO clinical parameters. Compared with the medium-risk and high-risk groups, the low-risk group had better survival at discharge (65.8% vs. 42.6% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001) and at 6 months (60.5% vs. 38.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.0001). The low-risk group also had a better neurologic outcome at discharge (50% vs. 31.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.0001) and 6 months after discharge (44.7% vs. 25.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.0003) than the medium-risk and high-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with refractory cardiac arrest receiving E-CPR can be stratified by pre-ECMO clinical factors to predict the clinical outcome. Larger-scale studies are required to validate our observations. BioMed Central 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7310513/ /pubmed/32576294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00753-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Siao, Fu-Yuan Chiu, Chun-Wen Chiu, Chun-Chieh Chang, Yu-Jun Chen, Ying-Chen Chen, Yao-Li Hsieh, Yung-Kun Chou, Chu-Chung Yen, Hsu-Hen Can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest? |
title | Can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest? |
title_full | Can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest? |
title_fullStr | Can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest? |
title_short | Can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest? |
title_sort | can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest? |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310513/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00753-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT siaofuyuan canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest AT chiuchunwen canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest AT chiuchunchieh canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest AT changyujun canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest AT chenyingchen canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest AT chenyaoli canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest AT hsiehyungkun canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest AT chouchuchung canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest AT yenhsuhen canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest |