Cargando…

Can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest?

BACKGROUND: Refractory cardiac arrest resistant to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-CPR) has a poor outcome. Although previous reports showed that extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) can improve the clinical outcome, there are no clinically applicable predictors of pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siao, Fu-Yuan, Chiu, Chun-Wen, Chiu, Chun-Chieh, Chang, Yu-Jun, Chen, Ying-Chen, Chen, Yao-Li, Hsieh, Yung-Kun, Chou, Chu-Chung, Yen, Hsu-Hen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00753-6
_version_ 1783549379085336576
author Siao, Fu-Yuan
Chiu, Chun-Wen
Chiu, Chun-Chieh
Chang, Yu-Jun
Chen, Ying-Chen
Chen, Yao-Li
Hsieh, Yung-Kun
Chou, Chu-Chung
Yen, Hsu-Hen
author_facet Siao, Fu-Yuan
Chiu, Chun-Wen
Chiu, Chun-Chieh
Chang, Yu-Jun
Chen, Ying-Chen
Chen, Yao-Li
Hsieh, Yung-Kun
Chou, Chu-Chung
Yen, Hsu-Hen
author_sort Siao, Fu-Yuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Refractory cardiac arrest resistant to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-CPR) has a poor outcome. Although previous reports showed that extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) can improve the clinical outcome, there are no clinically applicable predictors of patient outcome that can be used prior to the implementation of E-CPR. We aimed to evaluate the use of clinical factors in patients with refractory cardiac arrest undergoing E-CPR to predict patient outcome in our institution. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study. We report 112 patients presenting with refractory cardiac arrest resistant to C-CPR between January 2012 and November 2017. All patients received E-CPR for continued life support when a cardiogenic etiology was presumed. Clinical factors associated with patient outcome were analyzed. Significant pre-ECMO clinical factors were extracted to build a patient outcome risk prediction model. RESULTS: The overall survival rate at discharge was 40.2, and 30.4% of patients were discharged with good neurologic function. The six-month survival rate after hospital discharge was 36.6, and 25.9% of patients had good neurologic function 6 months after discharge. We stratified the patients into low-risk (n = 38), medium-risk (n = 47), and high-risk groups (n = 27) according to the TLR score (low-flow Time, cardiac arrest Location, and initial cardiac arrest Rhythm) that we derived from pre-ECMO clinical parameters. Compared with the medium-risk and high-risk groups, the low-risk group had better survival at discharge (65.8% vs. 42.6% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001) and at 6 months (60.5% vs. 38.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.0001). The low-risk group also had a better neurologic outcome at discharge (50% vs. 31.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.0001) and 6 months after discharge (44.7% vs. 25.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.0003) than the medium-risk and high-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with refractory cardiac arrest receiving E-CPR can be stratified by pre-ECMO clinical factors to predict the clinical outcome. Larger-scale studies are required to validate our observations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7310513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73105132020-06-23 Can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest? Siao, Fu-Yuan Chiu, Chun-Wen Chiu, Chun-Chieh Chang, Yu-Jun Chen, Ying-Chen Chen, Yao-Li Hsieh, Yung-Kun Chou, Chu-Chung Yen, Hsu-Hen Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Original Research BACKGROUND: Refractory cardiac arrest resistant to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-CPR) has a poor outcome. Although previous reports showed that extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) can improve the clinical outcome, there are no clinically applicable predictors of patient outcome that can be used prior to the implementation of E-CPR. We aimed to evaluate the use of clinical factors in patients with refractory cardiac arrest undergoing E-CPR to predict patient outcome in our institution. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study. We report 112 patients presenting with refractory cardiac arrest resistant to C-CPR between January 2012 and November 2017. All patients received E-CPR for continued life support when a cardiogenic etiology was presumed. Clinical factors associated with patient outcome were analyzed. Significant pre-ECMO clinical factors were extracted to build a patient outcome risk prediction model. RESULTS: The overall survival rate at discharge was 40.2, and 30.4% of patients were discharged with good neurologic function. The six-month survival rate after hospital discharge was 36.6, and 25.9% of patients had good neurologic function 6 months after discharge. We stratified the patients into low-risk (n = 38), medium-risk (n = 47), and high-risk groups (n = 27) according to the TLR score (low-flow Time, cardiac arrest Location, and initial cardiac arrest Rhythm) that we derived from pre-ECMO clinical parameters. Compared with the medium-risk and high-risk groups, the low-risk group had better survival at discharge (65.8% vs. 42.6% vs. 0%, p < 0.0001) and at 6 months (60.5% vs. 38.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.0001). The low-risk group also had a better neurologic outcome at discharge (50% vs. 31.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.0001) and 6 months after discharge (44.7% vs. 25.5% vs. 0%, p = 0.0003) than the medium-risk and high-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with refractory cardiac arrest receiving E-CPR can be stratified by pre-ECMO clinical factors to predict the clinical outcome. Larger-scale studies are required to validate our observations. BioMed Central 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7310513/ /pubmed/32576294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00753-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Original Research
Siao, Fu-Yuan
Chiu, Chun-Wen
Chiu, Chun-Chieh
Chang, Yu-Jun
Chen, Ying-Chen
Chen, Yao-Li
Hsieh, Yung-Kun
Chou, Chu-Chung
Yen, Hsu-Hen
Can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest?
title Can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest?
title_full Can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest?
title_fullStr Can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest?
title_full_unstemmed Can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest?
title_short Can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest?
title_sort can we predict patient outcome before extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiac arrest?
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00753-6
work_keys_str_mv AT siaofuyuan canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest
AT chiuchunwen canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest
AT chiuchunchieh canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest
AT changyujun canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest
AT chenyingchen canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest
AT chenyaoli canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest
AT hsiehyungkun canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest
AT chouchuchung canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest
AT yenhsuhen canwepredictpatientoutcomebeforeextracorporealmembraneoxygenationforrefractorycardiacarrest