Cargando…
Evaluation of clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome
INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common disease in critically ill patients that has a high incidence and mortality rate worldwide. At present, there is no specific treatment for ARDS. Traditional Chinese medicine has been shown to have good potential in preventing and tr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32569164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020341 |
_version_ | 1783549441596194816 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Song Zhang, Li Long, Kunlan Gao, Peiyang Zhang, Chuantao Ding, Peng Chen, Jun Zhang, Xiaoyun Qian, Lin |
author_facet | Zhang, Song Zhang, Li Long, Kunlan Gao, Peiyang Zhang, Chuantao Ding, Peng Chen, Jun Zhang, Xiaoyun Qian, Lin |
author_sort | Zhang, Song |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common disease in critically ill patients that has a high incidence and mortality rate worldwide. At present, there is no specific treatment for ARDS. Traditional Chinese medicine has been shown to have good potential in preventing and treating ARDS, especially in reducing the dosages of Western medicines and therefore, adverse drug reactions. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of integrated Chinese and Western medicine to that of Western medicine alone in the treatment of ARDS. METHODS: We are proposing a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which 110 eligible patients would be enrolled and randomly divided into a Western medicine treatment group and an integrated Chinese and Western medicine treatment group. After 2 weeks of interventions and 1 year of follow-up, the clinical efficacy and safety of Jiawei qianyang dan in ARDS patients would be observed. The outcomes measured would include the Traditional Chinese medicine symptom score, the oxygenation index (PɑO2/FiO2), extravascular pulmonary water index, duration of mechanical ventilation, number of ICU hospitalization days, and the 28-day mortality rate for the 2 groups before and after treatment. The all-cause mortality rate, respiratory failure mortality rate, and readmission rate after 1 year of follow-up will be statistically analyzed and safety will be evaluated. DISCUSSION: In this study, we aim to demonstrate the greater clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of ARDS compared to that of Western medicine alone. In order to do this, we hope to provide evidence for the clinically supportive effect of the Jiawei qianyang dan in the treatment of ARDS and therefore demonstrate a more effective treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7310857 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73108572020-07-08 Evaluation of clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome Zhang, Song Zhang, Li Long, Kunlan Gao, Peiyang Zhang, Chuantao Ding, Peng Chen, Jun Zhang, Xiaoyun Qian, Lin Medicine (Baltimore) 3900 INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common disease in critically ill patients that has a high incidence and mortality rate worldwide. At present, there is no specific treatment for ARDS. Traditional Chinese medicine has been shown to have good potential in preventing and treating ARDS, especially in reducing the dosages of Western medicines and therefore, adverse drug reactions. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy of integrated Chinese and Western medicine to that of Western medicine alone in the treatment of ARDS. METHODS: We are proposing a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which 110 eligible patients would be enrolled and randomly divided into a Western medicine treatment group and an integrated Chinese and Western medicine treatment group. After 2 weeks of interventions and 1 year of follow-up, the clinical efficacy and safety of Jiawei qianyang dan in ARDS patients would be observed. The outcomes measured would include the Traditional Chinese medicine symptom score, the oxygenation index (PɑO2/FiO2), extravascular pulmonary water index, duration of mechanical ventilation, number of ICU hospitalization days, and the 28-day mortality rate for the 2 groups before and after treatment. The all-cause mortality rate, respiratory failure mortality rate, and readmission rate after 1 year of follow-up will be statistically analyzed and safety will be evaluated. DISCUSSION: In this study, we aim to demonstrate the greater clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of ARDS compared to that of Western medicine alone. In order to do this, we hope to provide evidence for the clinically supportive effect of the Jiawei qianyang dan in the treatment of ARDS and therefore demonstrate a more effective treatment. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7310857/ /pubmed/32569164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020341 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 3900 Zhang, Song Zhang, Li Long, Kunlan Gao, Peiyang Zhang, Chuantao Ding, Peng Chen, Jun Zhang, Xiaoyun Qian, Lin Evaluation of clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title | Evaluation of clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title_full | Evaluation of clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title_short | Evaluation of clinical efficacy of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome |
title_sort | evaluation of clinical efficacy of integrated traditional chinese and western medicine in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome |
topic | 3900 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32569164 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020341 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangsong evaluationofclinicalefficacyofintegratedtraditionalchineseandwesternmedicineinthetreatmentofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT zhangli evaluationofclinicalefficacyofintegratedtraditionalchineseandwesternmedicineinthetreatmentofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT longkunlan evaluationofclinicalefficacyofintegratedtraditionalchineseandwesternmedicineinthetreatmentofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT gaopeiyang evaluationofclinicalefficacyofintegratedtraditionalchineseandwesternmedicineinthetreatmentofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT zhangchuantao evaluationofclinicalefficacyofintegratedtraditionalchineseandwesternmedicineinthetreatmentofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT dingpeng evaluationofclinicalefficacyofintegratedtraditionalchineseandwesternmedicineinthetreatmentofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT chenjun evaluationofclinicalefficacyofintegratedtraditionalchineseandwesternmedicineinthetreatmentofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT zhangxiaoyun evaluationofclinicalefficacyofintegratedtraditionalchineseandwesternmedicineinthetreatmentofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome AT qianlin evaluationofclinicalefficacyofintegratedtraditionalchineseandwesternmedicineinthetreatmentofacuterespiratorydistresssyndrome |