Cargando…
Super-resolution imaging of RAD51 and DMC1 in DNA repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase
The recombinase RAD51, and its meiosis-specific paralog DMC1 localize at DNA double-strand break (DSB) sites in meiotic prophase. While both proteins are required during meiotic prophase, their spatial organization during meiotic DSB repair is not fully understood. Using super-resolution microscopy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32502153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008595 |
_version_ | 1783549443009675264 |
---|---|
author | Slotman, Johan A. Paul, Maarten W. Carofiglio, Fabrizia de Gruiter, H. Martijn Vergroesen, Tessa Koornneef, Lieke van Cappellen, Wiggert A. Houtsmuller, Adriaan B. Baarends, Willy M. |
author_facet | Slotman, Johan A. Paul, Maarten W. Carofiglio, Fabrizia de Gruiter, H. Martijn Vergroesen, Tessa Koornneef, Lieke van Cappellen, Wiggert A. Houtsmuller, Adriaan B. Baarends, Willy M. |
author_sort | Slotman, Johan A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The recombinase RAD51, and its meiosis-specific paralog DMC1 localize at DNA double-strand break (DSB) sites in meiotic prophase. While both proteins are required during meiotic prophase, their spatial organization during meiotic DSB repair is not fully understood. Using super-resolution microscopy on mouse spermatocyte nuclei, we aimed to define their relative position at DSB foci, and how these vary in time. We show that a large fraction of meiotic DSB repair foci (38%) consisted of a single RAD51 nanofocus and a single DMC1 nanofocus (D1R1 configuration) that were partially overlapping with each other (average center-center distance around 70 nm). The vast majority of the rest of the foci had a similar large RAD51 and DMC1 nanofocus, but in combination with additional smaller nanofoci (D2R1, D1R2, D2R2, or DxRy configuration) at an average distance of around 250 nm. As prophase progressed, less D1R1 and more D2R1 foci were observed, where the large RAD51 nanofocus in the D2R1 foci elongated and gradually oriented towards the distant small DMC1 nanofocus. D1R2 foci frequency was relatively constant, and the single DMC1 nanofocus did not elongate, but was frequently observed between the two RAD51 nanofoci in early stages. D2R2 foci were rare (<10%) and nearest neighbour analyses also did not reveal cofoci formation between D1R1 foci. However, overall, foci localized nonrandomly along the SC, and the frequency of the distance distributions peaked at 800 nm, indicating interference and/or a preferred distance between two ends of a DSB. DMC1 nanofoci where somewhat further away from the axial or lateral elements of the synaptonemal complex (SC, connecting the chromosomal axes of homologs) compared to RAD51 nanofoci. In the absence of the transverse filament of the SC, early configurations were more prominent, and RAD51 nanofocus elongation occurred only transiently. This in-depth analysis of single cell landscapes of RAD51 and DMC1 accumulation patterns at DSB repair sites at super-resolution revealed the variability of foci composition, and defined functional consensus configurations that change over time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7310863 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73108632020-06-26 Super-resolution imaging of RAD51 and DMC1 in DNA repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase Slotman, Johan A. Paul, Maarten W. Carofiglio, Fabrizia de Gruiter, H. Martijn Vergroesen, Tessa Koornneef, Lieke van Cappellen, Wiggert A. Houtsmuller, Adriaan B. Baarends, Willy M. PLoS Genet Research Article The recombinase RAD51, and its meiosis-specific paralog DMC1 localize at DNA double-strand break (DSB) sites in meiotic prophase. While both proteins are required during meiotic prophase, their spatial organization during meiotic DSB repair is not fully understood. Using super-resolution microscopy on mouse spermatocyte nuclei, we aimed to define their relative position at DSB foci, and how these vary in time. We show that a large fraction of meiotic DSB repair foci (38%) consisted of a single RAD51 nanofocus and a single DMC1 nanofocus (D1R1 configuration) that were partially overlapping with each other (average center-center distance around 70 nm). The vast majority of the rest of the foci had a similar large RAD51 and DMC1 nanofocus, but in combination with additional smaller nanofoci (D2R1, D1R2, D2R2, or DxRy configuration) at an average distance of around 250 nm. As prophase progressed, less D1R1 and more D2R1 foci were observed, where the large RAD51 nanofocus in the D2R1 foci elongated and gradually oriented towards the distant small DMC1 nanofocus. D1R2 foci frequency was relatively constant, and the single DMC1 nanofocus did not elongate, but was frequently observed between the two RAD51 nanofoci in early stages. D2R2 foci were rare (<10%) and nearest neighbour analyses also did not reveal cofoci formation between D1R1 foci. However, overall, foci localized nonrandomly along the SC, and the frequency of the distance distributions peaked at 800 nm, indicating interference and/or a preferred distance between two ends of a DSB. DMC1 nanofoci where somewhat further away from the axial or lateral elements of the synaptonemal complex (SC, connecting the chromosomal axes of homologs) compared to RAD51 nanofoci. In the absence of the transverse filament of the SC, early configurations were more prominent, and RAD51 nanofocus elongation occurred only transiently. This in-depth analysis of single cell landscapes of RAD51 and DMC1 accumulation patterns at DSB repair sites at super-resolution revealed the variability of foci composition, and defined functional consensus configurations that change over time. Public Library of Science 2020-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7310863/ /pubmed/32502153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008595 Text en © 2020 Slotman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Slotman, Johan A. Paul, Maarten W. Carofiglio, Fabrizia de Gruiter, H. Martijn Vergroesen, Tessa Koornneef, Lieke van Cappellen, Wiggert A. Houtsmuller, Adriaan B. Baarends, Willy M. Super-resolution imaging of RAD51 and DMC1 in DNA repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase |
title | Super-resolution imaging of RAD51 and DMC1 in DNA repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase |
title_full | Super-resolution imaging of RAD51 and DMC1 in DNA repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase |
title_fullStr | Super-resolution imaging of RAD51 and DMC1 in DNA repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase |
title_full_unstemmed | Super-resolution imaging of RAD51 and DMC1 in DNA repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase |
title_short | Super-resolution imaging of RAD51 and DMC1 in DNA repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase |
title_sort | super-resolution imaging of rad51 and dmc1 in dna repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310863/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32502153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008595 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT slotmanjohana superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase AT paulmaartenw superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase AT carofigliofabrizia superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase AT degruiterhmartijn superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase AT vergroesentessa superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase AT koornneeflieke superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase AT vancappellenwiggerta superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase AT houtsmulleradriaanb superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase AT baarendswillym superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase |