Cargando…

Super-resolution imaging of RAD51 and DMC1 in DNA repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase

The recombinase RAD51, and its meiosis-specific paralog DMC1 localize at DNA double-strand break (DSB) sites in meiotic prophase. While both proteins are required during meiotic prophase, their spatial organization during meiotic DSB repair is not fully understood. Using super-resolution microscopy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Slotman, Johan A., Paul, Maarten W., Carofiglio, Fabrizia, de Gruiter, H. Martijn, Vergroesen, Tessa, Koornneef, Lieke, van Cappellen, Wiggert A., Houtsmuller, Adriaan B., Baarends, Willy M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32502153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008595
_version_ 1783549443009675264
author Slotman, Johan A.
Paul, Maarten W.
Carofiglio, Fabrizia
de Gruiter, H. Martijn
Vergroesen, Tessa
Koornneef, Lieke
van Cappellen, Wiggert A.
Houtsmuller, Adriaan B.
Baarends, Willy M.
author_facet Slotman, Johan A.
Paul, Maarten W.
Carofiglio, Fabrizia
de Gruiter, H. Martijn
Vergroesen, Tessa
Koornneef, Lieke
van Cappellen, Wiggert A.
Houtsmuller, Adriaan B.
Baarends, Willy M.
author_sort Slotman, Johan A.
collection PubMed
description The recombinase RAD51, and its meiosis-specific paralog DMC1 localize at DNA double-strand break (DSB) sites in meiotic prophase. While both proteins are required during meiotic prophase, their spatial organization during meiotic DSB repair is not fully understood. Using super-resolution microscopy on mouse spermatocyte nuclei, we aimed to define their relative position at DSB foci, and how these vary in time. We show that a large fraction of meiotic DSB repair foci (38%) consisted of a single RAD51 nanofocus and a single DMC1 nanofocus (D1R1 configuration) that were partially overlapping with each other (average center-center distance around 70 nm). The vast majority of the rest of the foci had a similar large RAD51 and DMC1 nanofocus, but in combination with additional smaller nanofoci (D2R1, D1R2, D2R2, or DxRy configuration) at an average distance of around 250 nm. As prophase progressed, less D1R1 and more D2R1 foci were observed, where the large RAD51 nanofocus in the D2R1 foci elongated and gradually oriented towards the distant small DMC1 nanofocus. D1R2 foci frequency was relatively constant, and the single DMC1 nanofocus did not elongate, but was frequently observed between the two RAD51 nanofoci in early stages. D2R2 foci were rare (<10%) and nearest neighbour analyses also did not reveal cofoci formation between D1R1 foci. However, overall, foci localized nonrandomly along the SC, and the frequency of the distance distributions peaked at 800 nm, indicating interference and/or a preferred distance between two ends of a DSB. DMC1 nanofoci where somewhat further away from the axial or lateral elements of the synaptonemal complex (SC, connecting the chromosomal axes of homologs) compared to RAD51 nanofoci. In the absence of the transverse filament of the SC, early configurations were more prominent, and RAD51 nanofocus elongation occurred only transiently. This in-depth analysis of single cell landscapes of RAD51 and DMC1 accumulation patterns at DSB repair sites at super-resolution revealed the variability of foci composition, and defined functional consensus configurations that change over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7310863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73108632020-06-26 Super-resolution imaging of RAD51 and DMC1 in DNA repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase Slotman, Johan A. Paul, Maarten W. Carofiglio, Fabrizia de Gruiter, H. Martijn Vergroesen, Tessa Koornneef, Lieke van Cappellen, Wiggert A. Houtsmuller, Adriaan B. Baarends, Willy M. PLoS Genet Research Article The recombinase RAD51, and its meiosis-specific paralog DMC1 localize at DNA double-strand break (DSB) sites in meiotic prophase. While both proteins are required during meiotic prophase, their spatial organization during meiotic DSB repair is not fully understood. Using super-resolution microscopy on mouse spermatocyte nuclei, we aimed to define their relative position at DSB foci, and how these vary in time. We show that a large fraction of meiotic DSB repair foci (38%) consisted of a single RAD51 nanofocus and a single DMC1 nanofocus (D1R1 configuration) that were partially overlapping with each other (average center-center distance around 70 nm). The vast majority of the rest of the foci had a similar large RAD51 and DMC1 nanofocus, but in combination with additional smaller nanofoci (D2R1, D1R2, D2R2, or DxRy configuration) at an average distance of around 250 nm. As prophase progressed, less D1R1 and more D2R1 foci were observed, where the large RAD51 nanofocus in the D2R1 foci elongated and gradually oriented towards the distant small DMC1 nanofocus. D1R2 foci frequency was relatively constant, and the single DMC1 nanofocus did not elongate, but was frequently observed between the two RAD51 nanofoci in early stages. D2R2 foci were rare (<10%) and nearest neighbour analyses also did not reveal cofoci formation between D1R1 foci. However, overall, foci localized nonrandomly along the SC, and the frequency of the distance distributions peaked at 800 nm, indicating interference and/or a preferred distance between two ends of a DSB. DMC1 nanofoci where somewhat further away from the axial or lateral elements of the synaptonemal complex (SC, connecting the chromosomal axes of homologs) compared to RAD51 nanofoci. In the absence of the transverse filament of the SC, early configurations were more prominent, and RAD51 nanofocus elongation occurred only transiently. This in-depth analysis of single cell landscapes of RAD51 and DMC1 accumulation patterns at DSB repair sites at super-resolution revealed the variability of foci composition, and defined functional consensus configurations that change over time. Public Library of Science 2020-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7310863/ /pubmed/32502153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008595 Text en © 2020 Slotman et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Slotman, Johan A.
Paul, Maarten W.
Carofiglio, Fabrizia
de Gruiter, H. Martijn
Vergroesen, Tessa
Koornneef, Lieke
van Cappellen, Wiggert A.
Houtsmuller, Adriaan B.
Baarends, Willy M.
Super-resolution imaging of RAD51 and DMC1 in DNA repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase
title Super-resolution imaging of RAD51 and DMC1 in DNA repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase
title_full Super-resolution imaging of RAD51 and DMC1 in DNA repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase
title_fullStr Super-resolution imaging of RAD51 and DMC1 in DNA repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase
title_full_unstemmed Super-resolution imaging of RAD51 and DMC1 in DNA repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase
title_short Super-resolution imaging of RAD51 and DMC1 in DNA repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase
title_sort super-resolution imaging of rad51 and dmc1 in dna repair foci reveals dynamic distribution patterns in meiotic prophase
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32502153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008595
work_keys_str_mv AT slotmanjohana superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase
AT paulmaartenw superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase
AT carofigliofabrizia superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase
AT degruiterhmartijn superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase
AT vergroesentessa superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase
AT koornneeflieke superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase
AT vancappellenwiggerta superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase
AT houtsmulleradriaanb superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase
AT baarendswillym superresolutionimagingofrad51anddmc1indnarepairfocirevealsdynamicdistributionpatternsinmeioticprophase