Cargando…
Pelvic peritoneum reconstruction using the bladder peritoneum flap in laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision: A multi-center, prospective single-arm cohort study (IDEAL Phase 2A)
INTRODUCTION: Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) may cause various surgical complications including disruption of perineal wound, perineal hernia and adhesive small-bowel obstruction. Pelvic peritoneum reconstruction (PPR) could prevent those complications, but it may not always be achie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32569206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020712 |
_version_ | 1783549455075639296 |
---|---|
author | Shen, Yu Yang, Tinghan Deng, Xiangbing Yang, Jinliang Meng, Wenjian Wang, Ziqiang |
author_facet | Shen, Yu Yang, Tinghan Deng, Xiangbing Yang, Jinliang Meng, Wenjian Wang, Ziqiang |
author_sort | Shen, Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) may cause various surgical complications including disruption of perineal wound, perineal hernia and adhesive small-bowel obstruction. Pelvic peritoneum reconstruction (PPR) could prevent those complications, but it may not always be achievable, especially in patients with severe pelvic fibrosis after neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Our previous study has reported the application of the PPR using the bladder peritoneum flap in laparoscopic ELAPE. The aim of the study is to evaluate the short-term clinical, technical and safety outcomes of PPR using the bladder peritoneum flap in laparoscopic ELAPE. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multi-center prospective single-arm cohort study and fulfill the IDEAL 2A stage principle. Rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic ELAPE, suffering rigid pelvis or huge perineal peritoneum defect, and having difficulty in primary perineal wound closure will be considered eligible. Main exclusion criteria are being complicated with urgent complications, ASA grade >3 and accompanied with mental illness. After informed consent, 30 patients are planned to be included in the study. Standard laparoscopic ELAPE with pelvic peritoneal floor reconstruction using bladder peritoneum flap are to be performed. The surgical safety is to be evaluated after one-year follow-up. Primary endpoints are the occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications of PPR using the bladder peritoneum flap. Second endpoints are overall complication rate within 30 days after surgery, extent of small intestine falling down to pelvic cavity, and other follow-up consequences within 1 year after surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This experiment was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04177407. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7310913 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73109132020-07-08 Pelvic peritoneum reconstruction using the bladder peritoneum flap in laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision: A multi-center, prospective single-arm cohort study (IDEAL Phase 2A) Shen, Yu Yang, Tinghan Deng, Xiangbing Yang, Jinliang Meng, Wenjian Wang, Ziqiang Medicine (Baltimore) 7100 INTRODUCTION: Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) may cause various surgical complications including disruption of perineal wound, perineal hernia and adhesive small-bowel obstruction. Pelvic peritoneum reconstruction (PPR) could prevent those complications, but it may not always be achievable, especially in patients with severe pelvic fibrosis after neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Our previous study has reported the application of the PPR using the bladder peritoneum flap in laparoscopic ELAPE. The aim of the study is to evaluate the short-term clinical, technical and safety outcomes of PPR using the bladder peritoneum flap in laparoscopic ELAPE. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multi-center prospective single-arm cohort study and fulfill the IDEAL 2A stage principle. Rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic ELAPE, suffering rigid pelvis or huge perineal peritoneum defect, and having difficulty in primary perineal wound closure will be considered eligible. Main exclusion criteria are being complicated with urgent complications, ASA grade >3 and accompanied with mental illness. After informed consent, 30 patients are planned to be included in the study. Standard laparoscopic ELAPE with pelvic peritoneal floor reconstruction using bladder peritoneum flap are to be performed. The surgical safety is to be evaluated after one-year follow-up. Primary endpoints are the occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications of PPR using the bladder peritoneum flap. Second endpoints are overall complication rate within 30 days after surgery, extent of small intestine falling down to pelvic cavity, and other follow-up consequences within 1 year after surgery. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This experiment was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04177407. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7310913/ /pubmed/32569206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020712 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
spellingShingle | 7100 Shen, Yu Yang, Tinghan Deng, Xiangbing Yang, Jinliang Meng, Wenjian Wang, Ziqiang Pelvic peritoneum reconstruction using the bladder peritoneum flap in laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision: A multi-center, prospective single-arm cohort study (IDEAL Phase 2A) |
title | Pelvic peritoneum reconstruction using the bladder peritoneum flap in laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision: A multi-center, prospective single-arm cohort study (IDEAL Phase 2A) |
title_full | Pelvic peritoneum reconstruction using the bladder peritoneum flap in laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision: A multi-center, prospective single-arm cohort study (IDEAL Phase 2A) |
title_fullStr | Pelvic peritoneum reconstruction using the bladder peritoneum flap in laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision: A multi-center, prospective single-arm cohort study (IDEAL Phase 2A) |
title_full_unstemmed | Pelvic peritoneum reconstruction using the bladder peritoneum flap in laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision: A multi-center, prospective single-arm cohort study (IDEAL Phase 2A) |
title_short | Pelvic peritoneum reconstruction using the bladder peritoneum flap in laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision: A multi-center, prospective single-arm cohort study (IDEAL Phase 2A) |
title_sort | pelvic peritoneum reconstruction using the bladder peritoneum flap in laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision: a multi-center, prospective single-arm cohort study (ideal phase 2a) |
topic | 7100 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7310913/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32569206 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020712 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shenyu pelvicperitoneumreconstructionusingthebladderperitoneumflapinlaparoscopicextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisionamulticenterprospectivesinglearmcohortstudyidealphase2a AT yangtinghan pelvicperitoneumreconstructionusingthebladderperitoneumflapinlaparoscopicextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisionamulticenterprospectivesinglearmcohortstudyidealphase2a AT dengxiangbing pelvicperitoneumreconstructionusingthebladderperitoneumflapinlaparoscopicextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisionamulticenterprospectivesinglearmcohortstudyidealphase2a AT yangjinliang pelvicperitoneumreconstructionusingthebladderperitoneumflapinlaparoscopicextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisionamulticenterprospectivesinglearmcohortstudyidealphase2a AT mengwenjian pelvicperitoneumreconstructionusingthebladderperitoneumflapinlaparoscopicextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisionamulticenterprospectivesinglearmcohortstudyidealphase2a AT wangziqiang pelvicperitoneumreconstructionusingthebladderperitoneumflapinlaparoscopicextralevatorabdominoperinealexcisionamulticenterprospectivesinglearmcohortstudyidealphase2a |