Cargando…
Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial
INTRODUCTION: Chronic subdural haematomas (CSDHs) are one of the most common neurosurgical conditions. The goal of surgery is to alleviate symptoms and minimise the risk of symptomatic recurrences. In the past, reoperation rates as high as 20%–30% were described for CSDH recurrences. However, follow...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32565480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038275 |
_version_ | 1783549480136605696 |
---|---|
author | Tommiska, Pihla Raj, Rahul Schwartz, Christoph Kivisaari, Riku Luostarinen, T Satopää, Jarno Taimela, Simo Järvinen, Teppo Ranstam, Jonas Frantzen, Janek Posti, Jussi Luoto, Teemu M Leinonen, Ville Tetri, Sami Koivisto, Timo Lönnrot, Kimmo |
author_facet | Tommiska, Pihla Raj, Rahul Schwartz, Christoph Kivisaari, Riku Luostarinen, T Satopää, Jarno Taimela, Simo Järvinen, Teppo Ranstam, Jonas Frantzen, Janek Posti, Jussi Luoto, Teemu M Leinonen, Ville Tetri, Sami Koivisto, Timo Lönnrot, Kimmo |
author_sort | Tommiska, Pihla |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Chronic subdural haematomas (CSDHs) are one of the most common neurosurgical conditions. The goal of surgery is to alleviate symptoms and minimise the risk of symptomatic recurrences. In the past, reoperation rates as high as 20%–30% were described for CSDH recurrences. However, following the introduction of subdural drainage, reoperation rates dropped to approximately 10%. The standard surgical technique includes burr-hole craniostomy, followed by intraoperative irrigation and placement of subdural drainage. Yet, the role of intraoperative irrigation has not been established. If there is no difference in recurrence rates between intraoperative irrigation and no irrigation, CSDH surgery could be carried out faster and more safely by omitting the step of irrigation. The aim of this multicentre randomised controlled trial is to study whether no intraoperative irrigation and subdural drainage results in non-inferior outcome compared with intraoperative irrigation and subdural drainage following burr-hole craniostomy of CSDH. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel group, non-inferiority multicentre trial comparing single burr-hole evacuation of CSDH with intraoperative irrigation and evacuation of CSDH without irrigation. In both groups, a passive subdural drain is used for 48 hours as a standard of treatment. The primary outcome is symptomatic CSDH recurrence requiring reoperation within 6 months. The predefined non-inferiority margin for the primary outcome is 7.5%. To achieve a 2.5% level of significance and 80% power, we will randomise 270 patients per group. Secondary outcomes include modified Rankin Scale, rate of mortality, duration of operation, length of hospital stay, adverse events and change in volume of CSDH. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS/3035/2019 §238) and duly registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. We will disseminate the findings of this study through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04203550 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7311024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73110242020-06-26 Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial Tommiska, Pihla Raj, Rahul Schwartz, Christoph Kivisaari, Riku Luostarinen, T Satopää, Jarno Taimela, Simo Järvinen, Teppo Ranstam, Jonas Frantzen, Janek Posti, Jussi Luoto, Teemu M Leinonen, Ville Tetri, Sami Koivisto, Timo Lönnrot, Kimmo BMJ Open Surgery INTRODUCTION: Chronic subdural haematomas (CSDHs) are one of the most common neurosurgical conditions. The goal of surgery is to alleviate symptoms and minimise the risk of symptomatic recurrences. In the past, reoperation rates as high as 20%–30% were described for CSDH recurrences. However, following the introduction of subdural drainage, reoperation rates dropped to approximately 10%. The standard surgical technique includes burr-hole craniostomy, followed by intraoperative irrigation and placement of subdural drainage. Yet, the role of intraoperative irrigation has not been established. If there is no difference in recurrence rates between intraoperative irrigation and no irrigation, CSDH surgery could be carried out faster and more safely by omitting the step of irrigation. The aim of this multicentre randomised controlled trial is to study whether no intraoperative irrigation and subdural drainage results in non-inferior outcome compared with intraoperative irrigation and subdural drainage following burr-hole craniostomy of CSDH. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel group, non-inferiority multicentre trial comparing single burr-hole evacuation of CSDH with intraoperative irrigation and evacuation of CSDH without irrigation. In both groups, a passive subdural drain is used for 48 hours as a standard of treatment. The primary outcome is symptomatic CSDH recurrence requiring reoperation within 6 months. The predefined non-inferiority margin for the primary outcome is 7.5%. To achieve a 2.5% level of significance and 80% power, we will randomise 270 patients per group. Secondary outcomes include modified Rankin Scale, rate of mortality, duration of operation, length of hospital stay, adverse events and change in volume of CSDH. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS/3035/2019 §238) and duly registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. We will disseminate the findings of this study through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04203550 BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7311024/ /pubmed/32565480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038275 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Tommiska, Pihla Raj, Rahul Schwartz, Christoph Kivisaari, Riku Luostarinen, T Satopää, Jarno Taimela, Simo Järvinen, Teppo Ranstam, Jonas Frantzen, Janek Posti, Jussi Luoto, Teemu M Leinonen, Ville Tetri, Sami Koivisto, Timo Lönnrot, Kimmo Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title | Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (finish): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32565480 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038275 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tommiskapihla finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT rajrahul finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT schwartzchristoph finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT kivisaaririku finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT luostarinent finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT satopaajarno finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT taimelasimo finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT jarvinenteppo finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ranstamjonas finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT frantzenjanek finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT postijussi finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT luototeemum finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT leinonenville finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT tetrisami finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT koivistotimo finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lonnrotkimmo finnishstudyofintraoperativeirrigationversusdrainaloneafterevacuationofchronicsubduralhaematomafinishastudyprotocolforamulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrial |