Cargando…

Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU)

BACKGROUND: Early mobilization of adults receiving intensive care improves health outcomes, yet little is known about mobilization practices in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). We aimed to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with physical rehabilitation in PICUs across Europe....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ista, Erwin, Scholefield, Barnaby R., Manning, Joseph C., Harth, Irene, Gawronski, Orsola, Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, Alicja, Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie, Kudchadkar, Sapna R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02988-2
_version_ 1783549502041358336
author Ista, Erwin
Scholefield, Barnaby R.
Manning, Joseph C.
Harth, Irene
Gawronski, Orsola
Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, Alicja
Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie
Kudchadkar, Sapna R.
author_facet Ista, Erwin
Scholefield, Barnaby R.
Manning, Joseph C.
Harth, Irene
Gawronski, Orsola
Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, Alicja
Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie
Kudchadkar, Sapna R.
author_sort Ista, Erwin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early mobilization of adults receiving intensive care improves health outcomes, yet little is known about mobilization practices in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). We aimed to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with physical rehabilitation in PICUs across Europe. METHODS: A 2-day, cross-sectional, multicentre point prevalence study was conducted in May and November 2018. The primary outcome was the prevalence of physical therapy (PT)- or occupational therapy (OT)-provided mobility. Clinical data and data on patient mobility, potential mobility safety events, and mobilization barriers were prospectively collected in patients admitted for ≥72 h. RESULTS: Data of 456 children admitted to one of 38 participating PICUs from 15 European countries were collected (456 patient days); 70% were under 3 years of age. The point prevalence of PT- and/or OT-provided mobility activities was 39% (179/456) (95% CI 34.7–43.9%) during the patient days, with significant differences between European regions. Nurses were involved in 72% (924/1283) of the mobility events; in the remaining 28%, PT/OT, physicians, family members, or other professionals were involved. Of the factors studied, family presence was most strongly positively associated with out-of-bed mobilization (aOR 7.83, 95% CI 3.09–19.79). Invasive mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube was negatively associated with out-of-bed mobility (aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12–0.68). Patients were completely immobile on 25% (115/456) of patient days. Barriers to mobilization were reported on 38% of patient days. The most common reported patient-related barriers were cardiovascular instability (n = 47, 10%), oversedation (n = 39, 9%), and medical contraindication (n = 37, 8%). Potential safety events occurred in 6% of all documented mobilization events. CONCLUSION: Therapists are infrequently consulted for mobilization of critically ill children in European PICUs. This study highlights the need for a systematic and interdisciplinary mobilization approach for critically ill children. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7311184
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73111842020-06-24 Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU) Ista, Erwin Scholefield, Barnaby R. Manning, Joseph C. Harth, Irene Gawronski, Orsola Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, Alicja Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie Kudchadkar, Sapna R. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Early mobilization of adults receiving intensive care improves health outcomes, yet little is known about mobilization practices in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). We aimed to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with physical rehabilitation in PICUs across Europe. METHODS: A 2-day, cross-sectional, multicentre point prevalence study was conducted in May and November 2018. The primary outcome was the prevalence of physical therapy (PT)- or occupational therapy (OT)-provided mobility. Clinical data and data on patient mobility, potential mobility safety events, and mobilization barriers were prospectively collected in patients admitted for ≥72 h. RESULTS: Data of 456 children admitted to one of 38 participating PICUs from 15 European countries were collected (456 patient days); 70% were under 3 years of age. The point prevalence of PT- and/or OT-provided mobility activities was 39% (179/456) (95% CI 34.7–43.9%) during the patient days, with significant differences between European regions. Nurses were involved in 72% (924/1283) of the mobility events; in the remaining 28%, PT/OT, physicians, family members, or other professionals were involved. Of the factors studied, family presence was most strongly positively associated with out-of-bed mobilization (aOR 7.83, 95% CI 3.09–19.79). Invasive mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube was negatively associated with out-of-bed mobility (aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12–0.68). Patients were completely immobile on 25% (115/456) of patient days. Barriers to mobilization were reported on 38% of patient days. The most common reported patient-related barriers were cardiovascular instability (n = 47, 10%), oversedation (n = 39, 9%), and medical contraindication (n = 37, 8%). Potential safety events occurred in 6% of all documented mobilization events. CONCLUSION: Therapists are infrequently consulted for mobilization of critically ill children in European PICUs. This study highlights the need for a systematic and interdisciplinary mobilization approach for critically ill children. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2020-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7311184/ /pubmed/32576273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02988-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ista, Erwin
Scholefield, Barnaby R.
Manning, Joseph C.
Harth, Irene
Gawronski, Orsola
Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, Alicja
Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie
Kudchadkar, Sapna R.
Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU)
title Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU)
title_full Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU)
title_fullStr Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU)
title_full_unstemmed Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU)
title_short Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU)
title_sort mobilization practices in critically ill children: a european point prevalence study (eu park-picu)
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311184/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576273
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02988-2
work_keys_str_mv AT istaerwin mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu
AT scholefieldbarnabyr mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu
AT manningjosephc mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu
AT harthirene mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu
AT gawronskiorsola mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu
AT bartkowskasniatkowskaalicja mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu
AT rameletannesylvie mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu
AT kudchadkarsapnar mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu
AT mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu