Cargando…
Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU)
BACKGROUND: Early mobilization of adults receiving intensive care improves health outcomes, yet little is known about mobilization practices in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). We aimed to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with physical rehabilitation in PICUs across Europe....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02988-2 |
_version_ | 1783549502041358336 |
---|---|
author | Ista, Erwin Scholefield, Barnaby R. Manning, Joseph C. Harth, Irene Gawronski, Orsola Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, Alicja Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie Kudchadkar, Sapna R. |
author_facet | Ista, Erwin Scholefield, Barnaby R. Manning, Joseph C. Harth, Irene Gawronski, Orsola Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, Alicja Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie Kudchadkar, Sapna R. |
author_sort | Ista, Erwin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Early mobilization of adults receiving intensive care improves health outcomes, yet little is known about mobilization practices in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). We aimed to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with physical rehabilitation in PICUs across Europe. METHODS: A 2-day, cross-sectional, multicentre point prevalence study was conducted in May and November 2018. The primary outcome was the prevalence of physical therapy (PT)- or occupational therapy (OT)-provided mobility. Clinical data and data on patient mobility, potential mobility safety events, and mobilization barriers were prospectively collected in patients admitted for ≥72 h. RESULTS: Data of 456 children admitted to one of 38 participating PICUs from 15 European countries were collected (456 patient days); 70% were under 3 years of age. The point prevalence of PT- and/or OT-provided mobility activities was 39% (179/456) (95% CI 34.7–43.9%) during the patient days, with significant differences between European regions. Nurses were involved in 72% (924/1283) of the mobility events; in the remaining 28%, PT/OT, physicians, family members, or other professionals were involved. Of the factors studied, family presence was most strongly positively associated with out-of-bed mobilization (aOR 7.83, 95% CI 3.09–19.79). Invasive mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube was negatively associated with out-of-bed mobility (aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12–0.68). Patients were completely immobile on 25% (115/456) of patient days. Barriers to mobilization were reported on 38% of patient days. The most common reported patient-related barriers were cardiovascular instability (n = 47, 10%), oversedation (n = 39, 9%), and medical contraindication (n = 37, 8%). Potential safety events occurred in 6% of all documented mobilization events. CONCLUSION: Therapists are infrequently consulted for mobilization of critically ill children in European PICUs. This study highlights the need for a systematic and interdisciplinary mobilization approach for critically ill children. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7311184 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73111842020-06-24 Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU) Ista, Erwin Scholefield, Barnaby R. Manning, Joseph C. Harth, Irene Gawronski, Orsola Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, Alicja Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie Kudchadkar, Sapna R. Crit Care Research BACKGROUND: Early mobilization of adults receiving intensive care improves health outcomes, yet little is known about mobilization practices in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs). We aimed to determine the prevalence of and factors associated with physical rehabilitation in PICUs across Europe. METHODS: A 2-day, cross-sectional, multicentre point prevalence study was conducted in May and November 2018. The primary outcome was the prevalence of physical therapy (PT)- or occupational therapy (OT)-provided mobility. Clinical data and data on patient mobility, potential mobility safety events, and mobilization barriers were prospectively collected in patients admitted for ≥72 h. RESULTS: Data of 456 children admitted to one of 38 participating PICUs from 15 European countries were collected (456 patient days); 70% were under 3 years of age. The point prevalence of PT- and/or OT-provided mobility activities was 39% (179/456) (95% CI 34.7–43.9%) during the patient days, with significant differences between European regions. Nurses were involved in 72% (924/1283) of the mobility events; in the remaining 28%, PT/OT, physicians, family members, or other professionals were involved. Of the factors studied, family presence was most strongly positively associated with out-of-bed mobilization (aOR 7.83, 95% CI 3.09–19.79). Invasive mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube was negatively associated with out-of-bed mobility (aOR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12–0.68). Patients were completely immobile on 25% (115/456) of patient days. Barriers to mobilization were reported on 38% of patient days. The most common reported patient-related barriers were cardiovascular instability (n = 47, 10%), oversedation (n = 39, 9%), and medical contraindication (n = 37, 8%). Potential safety events occurred in 6% of all documented mobilization events. CONCLUSION: Therapists are infrequently consulted for mobilization of critically ill children in European PICUs. This study highlights the need for a systematic and interdisciplinary mobilization approach for critically ill children. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] BioMed Central 2020-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7311184/ /pubmed/32576273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02988-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ista, Erwin Scholefield, Barnaby R. Manning, Joseph C. Harth, Irene Gawronski, Orsola Bartkowska-Śniatkowska, Alicja Ramelet, Anne-Sylvie Kudchadkar, Sapna R. Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU) |
title | Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU) |
title_full | Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU) |
title_fullStr | Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU) |
title_full_unstemmed | Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU) |
title_short | Mobilization practices in critically ill children: a European point prevalence study (EU PARK-PICU) |
title_sort | mobilization practices in critically ill children: a european point prevalence study (eu park-picu) |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311184/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02988-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT istaerwin mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu AT scholefieldbarnabyr mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu AT manningjosephc mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu AT harthirene mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu AT gawronskiorsola mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu AT bartkowskasniatkowskaalicja mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu AT rameletannesylvie mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu AT kudchadkarsapnar mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu AT mobilizationpracticesincriticallyillchildrenaeuropeanpointprevalencestudyeuparkpicu |