Cargando…
Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models
PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) plays an important role in the preoperative assessment of gliomas; however, the diagnostic performance of histogram-derived parameters from mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential DWI models in the grading of gliomas has not been fully investigated. Therefore,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32424712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02456-2 |
_version_ | 1783549522347032576 |
---|---|
author | Kusunoki, Masaoki Kikuchi, Kazufumi Togao, Osamu Yamashita, Koji Momosaka, Daichi Kikuchi, Yoshitomo Kuga, Daisuke Hata, Nobuhiro Mizoguchi, Masahiro Iihara, Koji Suzuki, Satoshi O. Iwaki, Toru Akamine, Yuta Hiwatashi, Akio |
author_facet | Kusunoki, Masaoki Kikuchi, Kazufumi Togao, Osamu Yamashita, Koji Momosaka, Daichi Kikuchi, Yoshitomo Kuga, Daisuke Hata, Nobuhiro Mizoguchi, Masahiro Iihara, Koji Suzuki, Satoshi O. Iwaki, Toru Akamine, Yuta Hiwatashi, Akio |
author_sort | Kusunoki, Masaoki |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) plays an important role in the preoperative assessment of gliomas; however, the diagnostic performance of histogram-derived parameters from mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential DWI models in the grading of gliomas has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we compared these models’ ability to differentiate between high-grade and low-grade gliomas. METHODS: This retrospective study included 22 patients with diffuse gliomas (age, 23–74 years; 12 males; 11 high-grade and 11 low-grade gliomas) who underwent preoperative 3 T-magnetic resonance imaging from October 2014 to August 2019. The apparent diffusion coefficient was calculated from the mono-exponential model. Using 13 b-values, the true-diffusion coefficient, pseudo-diffusion coefficient, and perfusion fraction were obtained from the bi-exponential model, and the distributed-diffusion coefficient and heterogeneity index were obtained from the stretched-exponential model. Region-of-interests were drawn on each imaging parameter map for subsequent histogram analyses. RESULTS: The skewness of the apparent diffusion, true-diffusion, and distributed-diffusion coefficients was significantly higher in high-grade than in low-grade gliomas (0.67 ± 0.67 vs. − 0.18 ± 0.63, 0.68 ± 0.74 vs. − 0.08 ± 0.66, 0.63 ± 0.72 vs. − 0.15 ± 0.73; P = 0.0066, 0.0192, and 0.0128, respectively). The 10th percentile of the heterogeneity index was significantly lower (0.77 ± 0.08 vs. 0.88 ± 0.04; P = 0.0004), and the 90th percentile of the perfusion fraction was significantly higher (12.64 ± 3.44 vs. 7.14 ± 1.70%: P < 0.0001), in high-grade than in low-grade gliomas. The combination of the 10th percentile of the true-diffusion coefficient and 90th percentile of the perfusion fraction showed the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.96). CONCLUSION: The bi-exponential model exhibited the best diagnostic performance for differentiating high-grade from low-grade gliomas. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00234-020-02456-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7311374 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73113742020-06-26 Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models Kusunoki, Masaoki Kikuchi, Kazufumi Togao, Osamu Yamashita, Koji Momosaka, Daichi Kikuchi, Yoshitomo Kuga, Daisuke Hata, Nobuhiro Mizoguchi, Masahiro Iihara, Koji Suzuki, Satoshi O. Iwaki, Toru Akamine, Yuta Hiwatashi, Akio Neuroradiology Diagnostic Neuroradiology PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) plays an important role in the preoperative assessment of gliomas; however, the diagnostic performance of histogram-derived parameters from mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential DWI models in the grading of gliomas has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we compared these models’ ability to differentiate between high-grade and low-grade gliomas. METHODS: This retrospective study included 22 patients with diffuse gliomas (age, 23–74 years; 12 males; 11 high-grade and 11 low-grade gliomas) who underwent preoperative 3 T-magnetic resonance imaging from October 2014 to August 2019. The apparent diffusion coefficient was calculated from the mono-exponential model. Using 13 b-values, the true-diffusion coefficient, pseudo-diffusion coefficient, and perfusion fraction were obtained from the bi-exponential model, and the distributed-diffusion coefficient and heterogeneity index were obtained from the stretched-exponential model. Region-of-interests were drawn on each imaging parameter map for subsequent histogram analyses. RESULTS: The skewness of the apparent diffusion, true-diffusion, and distributed-diffusion coefficients was significantly higher in high-grade than in low-grade gliomas (0.67 ± 0.67 vs. − 0.18 ± 0.63, 0.68 ± 0.74 vs. − 0.08 ± 0.66, 0.63 ± 0.72 vs. − 0.15 ± 0.73; P = 0.0066, 0.0192, and 0.0128, respectively). The 10th percentile of the heterogeneity index was significantly lower (0.77 ± 0.08 vs. 0.88 ± 0.04; P = 0.0004), and the 90th percentile of the perfusion fraction was significantly higher (12.64 ± 3.44 vs. 7.14 ± 1.70%: P < 0.0001), in high-grade than in low-grade gliomas. The combination of the 10th percentile of the true-diffusion coefficient and 90th percentile of the perfusion fraction showed the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.96). CONCLUSION: The bi-exponential model exhibited the best diagnostic performance for differentiating high-grade from low-grade gliomas. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00234-020-02456-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7311374/ /pubmed/32424712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02456-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Diagnostic Neuroradiology Kusunoki, Masaoki Kikuchi, Kazufumi Togao, Osamu Yamashita, Koji Momosaka, Daichi Kikuchi, Yoshitomo Kuga, Daisuke Hata, Nobuhiro Mizoguchi, Masahiro Iihara, Koji Suzuki, Satoshi O. Iwaki, Toru Akamine, Yuta Hiwatashi, Akio Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models |
title | Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models |
title_full | Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models |
title_fullStr | Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models |
title_full_unstemmed | Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models |
title_short | Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models |
title_sort | differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models |
topic | Diagnostic Neuroradiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311374/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32424712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02456-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kusunokimasaoki differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels AT kikuchikazufumi differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels AT togaoosamu differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels AT yamashitakoji differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels AT momosakadaichi differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels AT kikuchiyoshitomo differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels AT kugadaisuke differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels AT hatanobuhiro differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels AT mizoguchimasahiro differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels AT iiharakoji differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels AT suzukisatoshio differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels AT iwakitoru differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels AT akamineyuta differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels AT hiwatashiakio differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels |