Cargando…

Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models

PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) plays an important role in the preoperative assessment of gliomas; however, the diagnostic performance of histogram-derived parameters from mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential DWI models in the grading of gliomas has not been fully investigated. Therefore,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kusunoki, Masaoki, Kikuchi, Kazufumi, Togao, Osamu, Yamashita, Koji, Momosaka, Daichi, Kikuchi, Yoshitomo, Kuga, Daisuke, Hata, Nobuhiro, Mizoguchi, Masahiro, Iihara, Koji, Suzuki, Satoshi O., Iwaki, Toru, Akamine, Yuta, Hiwatashi, Akio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32424712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02456-2
_version_ 1783549522347032576
author Kusunoki, Masaoki
Kikuchi, Kazufumi
Togao, Osamu
Yamashita, Koji
Momosaka, Daichi
Kikuchi, Yoshitomo
Kuga, Daisuke
Hata, Nobuhiro
Mizoguchi, Masahiro
Iihara, Koji
Suzuki, Satoshi O.
Iwaki, Toru
Akamine, Yuta
Hiwatashi, Akio
author_facet Kusunoki, Masaoki
Kikuchi, Kazufumi
Togao, Osamu
Yamashita, Koji
Momosaka, Daichi
Kikuchi, Yoshitomo
Kuga, Daisuke
Hata, Nobuhiro
Mizoguchi, Masahiro
Iihara, Koji
Suzuki, Satoshi O.
Iwaki, Toru
Akamine, Yuta
Hiwatashi, Akio
author_sort Kusunoki, Masaoki
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) plays an important role in the preoperative assessment of gliomas; however, the diagnostic performance of histogram-derived parameters from mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential DWI models in the grading of gliomas has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we compared these models’ ability to differentiate between high-grade and low-grade gliomas. METHODS: This retrospective study included 22 patients with diffuse gliomas (age, 23–74 years; 12 males; 11 high-grade and 11 low-grade gliomas) who underwent preoperative 3 T-magnetic resonance imaging from October 2014 to August 2019. The apparent diffusion coefficient was calculated from the mono-exponential model. Using 13 b-values, the true-diffusion coefficient, pseudo-diffusion coefficient, and perfusion fraction were obtained from the bi-exponential model, and the distributed-diffusion coefficient and heterogeneity index were obtained from the stretched-exponential model. Region-of-interests were drawn on each imaging parameter map for subsequent histogram analyses. RESULTS: The skewness of the apparent diffusion, true-diffusion, and distributed-diffusion coefficients was significantly higher in high-grade than in low-grade gliomas (0.67 ± 0.67 vs. − 0.18 ± 0.63, 0.68 ± 0.74 vs. − 0.08 ± 0.66, 0.63 ± 0.72 vs. − 0.15 ± 0.73; P = 0.0066, 0.0192, and 0.0128, respectively). The 10th percentile of the heterogeneity index was significantly lower (0.77 ± 0.08 vs. 0.88 ± 0.04; P = 0.0004), and the 90th percentile of the perfusion fraction was significantly higher (12.64 ± 3.44 vs. 7.14 ± 1.70%: P < 0.0001), in high-grade than in low-grade gliomas. The combination of the 10th percentile of the true-diffusion coefficient and 90th percentile of the perfusion fraction showed the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.96). CONCLUSION: The bi-exponential model exhibited the best diagnostic performance for differentiating high-grade from low-grade gliomas. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00234-020-02456-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7311374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73113742020-06-26 Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models Kusunoki, Masaoki Kikuchi, Kazufumi Togao, Osamu Yamashita, Koji Momosaka, Daichi Kikuchi, Yoshitomo Kuga, Daisuke Hata, Nobuhiro Mizoguchi, Masahiro Iihara, Koji Suzuki, Satoshi O. Iwaki, Toru Akamine, Yuta Hiwatashi, Akio Neuroradiology Diagnostic Neuroradiology PURPOSE: Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) plays an important role in the preoperative assessment of gliomas; however, the diagnostic performance of histogram-derived parameters from mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential DWI models in the grading of gliomas has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we compared these models’ ability to differentiate between high-grade and low-grade gliomas. METHODS: This retrospective study included 22 patients with diffuse gliomas (age, 23–74 years; 12 males; 11 high-grade and 11 low-grade gliomas) who underwent preoperative 3 T-magnetic resonance imaging from October 2014 to August 2019. The apparent diffusion coefficient was calculated from the mono-exponential model. Using 13 b-values, the true-diffusion coefficient, pseudo-diffusion coefficient, and perfusion fraction were obtained from the bi-exponential model, and the distributed-diffusion coefficient and heterogeneity index were obtained from the stretched-exponential model. Region-of-interests were drawn on each imaging parameter map for subsequent histogram analyses. RESULTS: The skewness of the apparent diffusion, true-diffusion, and distributed-diffusion coefficients was significantly higher in high-grade than in low-grade gliomas (0.67 ± 0.67 vs. − 0.18 ± 0.63, 0.68 ± 0.74 vs. − 0.08 ± 0.66, 0.63 ± 0.72 vs. − 0.15 ± 0.73; P = 0.0066, 0.0192, and 0.0128, respectively). The 10th percentile of the heterogeneity index was significantly lower (0.77 ± 0.08 vs. 0.88 ± 0.04; P = 0.0004), and the 90th percentile of the perfusion fraction was significantly higher (12.64 ± 3.44 vs. 7.14 ± 1.70%: P < 0.0001), in high-grade than in low-grade gliomas. The combination of the 10th percentile of the true-diffusion coefficient and 90th percentile of the perfusion fraction showed the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.96). CONCLUSION: The bi-exponential model exhibited the best diagnostic performance for differentiating high-grade from low-grade gliomas. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00234-020-02456-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-05-18 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7311374/ /pubmed/32424712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02456-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Diagnostic Neuroradiology
Kusunoki, Masaoki
Kikuchi, Kazufumi
Togao, Osamu
Yamashita, Koji
Momosaka, Daichi
Kikuchi, Yoshitomo
Kuga, Daisuke
Hata, Nobuhiro
Mizoguchi, Masahiro
Iihara, Koji
Suzuki, Satoshi O.
Iwaki, Toru
Akamine, Yuta
Hiwatashi, Akio
Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models
title Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models
title_full Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models
title_fullStr Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models
title_full_unstemmed Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models
title_short Differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models
title_sort differentiation of high-grade from low-grade diffuse gliomas using diffusion-weighted imaging: a comparative study of mono-, bi-, and stretched-exponential diffusion models
topic Diagnostic Neuroradiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32424712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02456-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kusunokimasaoki differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels
AT kikuchikazufumi differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels
AT togaoosamu differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels
AT yamashitakoji differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels
AT momosakadaichi differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels
AT kikuchiyoshitomo differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels
AT kugadaisuke differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels
AT hatanobuhiro differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels
AT mizoguchimasahiro differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels
AT iiharakoji differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels
AT suzukisatoshio differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels
AT iwakitoru differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels
AT akamineyuta differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels
AT hiwatashiakio differentiationofhighgradefromlowgradediffusegliomasusingdiffusionweightedimagingacomparativestudyofmonobiandstretchedexponentialdiffusionmodels