Cargando…

Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data

ATAC-seq is widely used to measure chromatin accessibility and identify open chromatin regions (OCRs). OCRs usually indicate active regulatory elements in the genome and are directly associated with the gene regulatory network. The identification of differential accessibility regions (DARs) between...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gontarz, Paul, Fu, Shuhua, Xing, Xiaoyun, Liu, Shaopeng, Miao, Benpeng, Bazylianska, Viktoriia, Sharma, Akhil, Madden, Pamela, Cates, Kitra, Yoo, Andrew, Moszczynska, Anna, Wang, Ting, Zhang, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66998-4
_version_ 1783549543011319808
author Gontarz, Paul
Fu, Shuhua
Xing, Xiaoyun
Liu, Shaopeng
Miao, Benpeng
Bazylianska, Viktoriia
Sharma, Akhil
Madden, Pamela
Cates, Kitra
Yoo, Andrew
Moszczynska, Anna
Wang, Ting
Zhang, Bo
author_facet Gontarz, Paul
Fu, Shuhua
Xing, Xiaoyun
Liu, Shaopeng
Miao, Benpeng
Bazylianska, Viktoriia
Sharma, Akhil
Madden, Pamela
Cates, Kitra
Yoo, Andrew
Moszczynska, Anna
Wang, Ting
Zhang, Bo
author_sort Gontarz, Paul
collection PubMed
description ATAC-seq is widely used to measure chromatin accessibility and identify open chromatin regions (OCRs). OCRs usually indicate active regulatory elements in the genome and are directly associated with the gene regulatory network. The identification of differential accessibility regions (DARs) between different biological conditions is critical in determining the differential activity of regulatory elements. Differential analysis of ATAC-seq shares many similarities with differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. However, the distribution of ATAC-seq signal intensity is different from that of RNA-seq data, and higher sensitivity is required for DARs identification. Many different tools can be used to perform differential analysis of ATAC-seq data, but a comprehensive comparison and benchmarking of these methods is still lacking. Here, we used simulated datasets to systematically measure the sensitivity and specificity of six different methods. We further discussed the statistical and signal density cut-offs in the differential analysis of ATAC-seq by applying them to real data. Batch effects are very common in high-throughput sequencing experiments. We illustrated that batch-effect correction can dramatically improve sensitivity in the differential analysis of ATAC-seq data. Finally, we developed a user-friendly package, BeCorrect, to perform batch effect correction and visualization of corrected ATAC-seq signals in a genome browser.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7311460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73114602020-06-25 Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data Gontarz, Paul Fu, Shuhua Xing, Xiaoyun Liu, Shaopeng Miao, Benpeng Bazylianska, Viktoriia Sharma, Akhil Madden, Pamela Cates, Kitra Yoo, Andrew Moszczynska, Anna Wang, Ting Zhang, Bo Sci Rep Article ATAC-seq is widely used to measure chromatin accessibility and identify open chromatin regions (OCRs). OCRs usually indicate active regulatory elements in the genome and are directly associated with the gene regulatory network. The identification of differential accessibility regions (DARs) between different biological conditions is critical in determining the differential activity of regulatory elements. Differential analysis of ATAC-seq shares many similarities with differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. However, the distribution of ATAC-seq signal intensity is different from that of RNA-seq data, and higher sensitivity is required for DARs identification. Many different tools can be used to perform differential analysis of ATAC-seq data, but a comprehensive comparison and benchmarking of these methods is still lacking. Here, we used simulated datasets to systematically measure the sensitivity and specificity of six different methods. We further discussed the statistical and signal density cut-offs in the differential analysis of ATAC-seq by applying them to real data. Batch effects are very common in high-throughput sequencing experiments. We illustrated that batch-effect correction can dramatically improve sensitivity in the differential analysis of ATAC-seq data. Finally, we developed a user-friendly package, BeCorrect, to perform batch effect correction and visualization of corrected ATAC-seq signals in a genome browser. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7311460/ /pubmed/32576878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66998-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Gontarz, Paul
Fu, Shuhua
Xing, Xiaoyun
Liu, Shaopeng
Miao, Benpeng
Bazylianska, Viktoriia
Sharma, Akhil
Madden, Pamela
Cates, Kitra
Yoo, Andrew
Moszczynska, Anna
Wang, Ting
Zhang, Bo
Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data
title Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data
title_full Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data
title_fullStr Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data
title_short Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data
title_sort comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for atac-seq data
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66998-4
work_keys_str_mv AT gontarzpaul comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata
AT fushuhua comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata
AT xingxiaoyun comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata
AT liushaopeng comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata
AT miaobenpeng comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata
AT bazylianskaviktoriia comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata
AT sharmaakhil comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata
AT maddenpamela comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata
AT cateskitra comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata
AT yooandrew comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata
AT moszczynskaanna comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata
AT wangting comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata
AT zhangbo comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata