Cargando…
Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data
ATAC-seq is widely used to measure chromatin accessibility and identify open chromatin regions (OCRs). OCRs usually indicate active regulatory elements in the genome and are directly associated with the gene regulatory network. The identification of differential accessibility regions (DARs) between...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66998-4 |
_version_ | 1783549543011319808 |
---|---|
author | Gontarz, Paul Fu, Shuhua Xing, Xiaoyun Liu, Shaopeng Miao, Benpeng Bazylianska, Viktoriia Sharma, Akhil Madden, Pamela Cates, Kitra Yoo, Andrew Moszczynska, Anna Wang, Ting Zhang, Bo |
author_facet | Gontarz, Paul Fu, Shuhua Xing, Xiaoyun Liu, Shaopeng Miao, Benpeng Bazylianska, Viktoriia Sharma, Akhil Madden, Pamela Cates, Kitra Yoo, Andrew Moszczynska, Anna Wang, Ting Zhang, Bo |
author_sort | Gontarz, Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | ATAC-seq is widely used to measure chromatin accessibility and identify open chromatin regions (OCRs). OCRs usually indicate active regulatory elements in the genome and are directly associated with the gene regulatory network. The identification of differential accessibility regions (DARs) between different biological conditions is critical in determining the differential activity of regulatory elements. Differential analysis of ATAC-seq shares many similarities with differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. However, the distribution of ATAC-seq signal intensity is different from that of RNA-seq data, and higher sensitivity is required for DARs identification. Many different tools can be used to perform differential analysis of ATAC-seq data, but a comprehensive comparison and benchmarking of these methods is still lacking. Here, we used simulated datasets to systematically measure the sensitivity and specificity of six different methods. We further discussed the statistical and signal density cut-offs in the differential analysis of ATAC-seq by applying them to real data. Batch effects are very common in high-throughput sequencing experiments. We illustrated that batch-effect correction can dramatically improve sensitivity in the differential analysis of ATAC-seq data. Finally, we developed a user-friendly package, BeCorrect, to perform batch effect correction and visualization of corrected ATAC-seq signals in a genome browser. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7311460 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73114602020-06-25 Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data Gontarz, Paul Fu, Shuhua Xing, Xiaoyun Liu, Shaopeng Miao, Benpeng Bazylianska, Viktoriia Sharma, Akhil Madden, Pamela Cates, Kitra Yoo, Andrew Moszczynska, Anna Wang, Ting Zhang, Bo Sci Rep Article ATAC-seq is widely used to measure chromatin accessibility and identify open chromatin regions (OCRs). OCRs usually indicate active regulatory elements in the genome and are directly associated with the gene regulatory network. The identification of differential accessibility regions (DARs) between different biological conditions is critical in determining the differential activity of regulatory elements. Differential analysis of ATAC-seq shares many similarities with differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. However, the distribution of ATAC-seq signal intensity is different from that of RNA-seq data, and higher sensitivity is required for DARs identification. Many different tools can be used to perform differential analysis of ATAC-seq data, but a comprehensive comparison and benchmarking of these methods is still lacking. Here, we used simulated datasets to systematically measure the sensitivity and specificity of six different methods. We further discussed the statistical and signal density cut-offs in the differential analysis of ATAC-seq by applying them to real data. Batch effects are very common in high-throughput sequencing experiments. We illustrated that batch-effect correction can dramatically improve sensitivity in the differential analysis of ATAC-seq data. Finally, we developed a user-friendly package, BeCorrect, to perform batch effect correction and visualization of corrected ATAC-seq signals in a genome browser. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7311460/ /pubmed/32576878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66998-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Gontarz, Paul Fu, Shuhua Xing, Xiaoyun Liu, Shaopeng Miao, Benpeng Bazylianska, Viktoriia Sharma, Akhil Madden, Pamela Cates, Kitra Yoo, Andrew Moszczynska, Anna Wang, Ting Zhang, Bo Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data |
title | Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data |
title_full | Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data |
title_fullStr | Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data |
title_short | Comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for ATAC-seq data |
title_sort | comparison of differential accessibility analysis strategies for atac-seq data |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311460/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66998-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gontarzpaul comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata AT fushuhua comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata AT xingxiaoyun comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata AT liushaopeng comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata AT miaobenpeng comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata AT bazylianskaviktoriia comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata AT sharmaakhil comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata AT maddenpamela comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata AT cateskitra comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata AT yooandrew comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata AT moszczynskaanna comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata AT wangting comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata AT zhangbo comparisonofdifferentialaccessibilityanalysisstrategiesforatacseqdata |