Cargando…

Long-term follow-up of bone remodelling after cementless hip arthroplasty using different stems

The present paper is concerned with the investigation of the phenomenon of long-term bone remodelling on cementless hip replacements. Changes in bone density in the periprosthetic region around the stem, measured by dual X–ray absorptiometry (DXA), were used as a measure of the osseous adaptation re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brodt, Steffen, Matziolis, Georg, Buckwitz, Bettina, Zippelius, Timo, Strube, Patrick, Roth, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67189-x
_version_ 1783549544204599296
author Brodt, Steffen
Matziolis, Georg
Buckwitz, Bettina
Zippelius, Timo
Strube, Patrick
Roth, Andreas
author_facet Brodt, Steffen
Matziolis, Georg
Buckwitz, Bettina
Zippelius, Timo
Strube, Patrick
Roth, Andreas
author_sort Brodt, Steffen
collection PubMed
description The present paper is concerned with the investigation of the phenomenon of long-term bone remodelling on cementless hip replacements. Changes in bone density in the periprosthetic region around the stem, measured by dual X–ray absorptiometry (DXA), were used as a measure of the osseous adaptation reaction. A postoperative follow-up of the use of four different types of prostheses of varying design after on average 13.3 (11.4–14.5) years. Specifically, the prostheses assessed in this study were the CLS/Spotorno stem with the Allofit cup by Zimmer, the Vision 2000 stem with the Duraloc cup by DePuy Synthes, the AlphaFit stem with the AlphaLock cup by Corin and the Mayo stem with the Trilogy cup by Zimmer. For the DXA measurement, the femur was divided into the zones suggested by Gruen et al. On the femur, there was a significant reduction in bone mineral density (BMD) in the proximal Region Of Interest (ROI) 1 (p = 0.003) and 7 (p < 0.001), whilst there was a significant increase in ROI 4 (p = 0.03). A greater degree of bone atrophy was seen in patients aged 60 years and older and in female patients. A remarkable finding when comparing the stems was a significantly greater reduction in BMD in ROI 6 (p = 0.003) in the case of the Vision 2000 stem and a markedly, but not statistically significantly smaller reduction in BMD in ROI 7 (p = 0.18) in the case of the short-stem Mayo-type prosthesis. The best clinical results were found with the use of the latter. The investigations provide a starting point for establishing a differential indication in the choice of prosthesis types, depending on age and sex, the use of short-stem prostheses, as well as the administration of bone-effective drugs for the prevention of stress shielding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7311465
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73114652020-06-25 Long-term follow-up of bone remodelling after cementless hip arthroplasty using different stems Brodt, Steffen Matziolis, Georg Buckwitz, Bettina Zippelius, Timo Strube, Patrick Roth, Andreas Sci Rep Article The present paper is concerned with the investigation of the phenomenon of long-term bone remodelling on cementless hip replacements. Changes in bone density in the periprosthetic region around the stem, measured by dual X–ray absorptiometry (DXA), were used as a measure of the osseous adaptation reaction. A postoperative follow-up of the use of four different types of prostheses of varying design after on average 13.3 (11.4–14.5) years. Specifically, the prostheses assessed in this study were the CLS/Spotorno stem with the Allofit cup by Zimmer, the Vision 2000 stem with the Duraloc cup by DePuy Synthes, the AlphaFit stem with the AlphaLock cup by Corin and the Mayo stem with the Trilogy cup by Zimmer. For the DXA measurement, the femur was divided into the zones suggested by Gruen et al. On the femur, there was a significant reduction in bone mineral density (BMD) in the proximal Region Of Interest (ROI) 1 (p = 0.003) and 7 (p < 0.001), whilst there was a significant increase in ROI 4 (p = 0.03). A greater degree of bone atrophy was seen in patients aged 60 years and older and in female patients. A remarkable finding when comparing the stems was a significantly greater reduction in BMD in ROI 6 (p = 0.003) in the case of the Vision 2000 stem and a markedly, but not statistically significantly smaller reduction in BMD in ROI 7 (p = 0.18) in the case of the short-stem Mayo-type prosthesis. The best clinical results were found with the use of the latter. The investigations provide a starting point for establishing a differential indication in the choice of prosthesis types, depending on age and sex, the use of short-stem prostheses, as well as the administration of bone-effective drugs for the prevention of stress shielding. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7311465/ /pubmed/32576922 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67189-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Brodt, Steffen
Matziolis, Georg
Buckwitz, Bettina
Zippelius, Timo
Strube, Patrick
Roth, Andreas
Long-term follow-up of bone remodelling after cementless hip arthroplasty using different stems
title Long-term follow-up of bone remodelling after cementless hip arthroplasty using different stems
title_full Long-term follow-up of bone remodelling after cementless hip arthroplasty using different stems
title_fullStr Long-term follow-up of bone remodelling after cementless hip arthroplasty using different stems
title_full_unstemmed Long-term follow-up of bone remodelling after cementless hip arthroplasty using different stems
title_short Long-term follow-up of bone remodelling after cementless hip arthroplasty using different stems
title_sort long-term follow-up of bone remodelling after cementless hip arthroplasty using different stems
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311465/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576922
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67189-x
work_keys_str_mv AT brodtsteffen longtermfollowupofboneremodellingaftercementlesshiparthroplastyusingdifferentstems
AT matziolisgeorg longtermfollowupofboneremodellingaftercementlesshiparthroplastyusingdifferentstems
AT buckwitzbettina longtermfollowupofboneremodellingaftercementlesshiparthroplastyusingdifferentstems
AT zippeliustimo longtermfollowupofboneremodellingaftercementlesshiparthroplastyusingdifferentstems
AT strubepatrick longtermfollowupofboneremodellingaftercementlesshiparthroplastyusingdifferentstems
AT rothandreas longtermfollowupofboneremodellingaftercementlesshiparthroplastyusingdifferentstems