Cargando…

Prophylactic Mastectomy: Postoperative Skin Flap Thickness Evaluated by MRT, Ultrasound and Clinical Examination

BACKGROUND: Women with an increased hereditary risk of breast cancer can undergo prophylactic mastectomy (PM), which provides a significant, but not total, risk reduction. There is an ongoing discussion about how much skin and subcutaneous tissue should be resected to perform an adequate PM while le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wiberg, Rebecca, Andersson, Magnus N., Svensson, Johan, Rosén, Anna, Koch, Freja, Björkgren, Annika, Sund, Malin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31907748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08157-2
_version_ 1783549553934336000
author Wiberg, Rebecca
Andersson, Magnus N.
Svensson, Johan
Rosén, Anna
Koch, Freja
Björkgren, Annika
Sund, Malin
author_facet Wiberg, Rebecca
Andersson, Magnus N.
Svensson, Johan
Rosén, Anna
Koch, Freja
Björkgren, Annika
Sund, Malin
author_sort Wiberg, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Women with an increased hereditary risk of breast cancer can undergo prophylactic mastectomy (PM), which provides a significant, but not total, risk reduction. There is an ongoing discussion about how much skin and subcutaneous tissue should be resected to perform an adequate PM while leaving viable skin flaps. METHODS: Forty-five women who had undergone PM were examined with magnetic resonance tomography (MRT), ultrasound (US) and clinical examination (CE) by a plastic surgeon and a general surgeon to estimate skin flap thickness. RESULTS: The estimated mean skin flap thickness after PM was 13.3 (± 9.6), 7.0 (± 3.3), 6.9 (± 2.8) and 7.4 (± 2.8) mm following MRT, US, and CE performed by a plastic surgeon and a general surgeon, respectively. The mean difference in estimated skin flap thickness was significant between MRT and the other measuring methods, while there was no significant difference between US and CE, nor between CE performed by the surgeons. The mean skin flap thickness was significantly affected by the age at PM. Following PM, necrosis was detected in 7/23 (30.4%) of the breasts in skin flaps ≤ 5 mm and in 5/46 (10.9%) of the breasts in skin flaps > 5 mm (OR 6.29; CI 1.20–32.94; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The odds of getting postoperative necrosis was > 6 times higher in skin flaps ≤ 5 mm. Thus, if the degree of remaining glandular tissue is acceptably low, it is desirable to create skin flaps thicker than 5 mm to prevent wound healing problems after the PM procedure. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-019-08157-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7311506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73115062020-06-26 Prophylactic Mastectomy: Postoperative Skin Flap Thickness Evaluated by MRT, Ultrasound and Clinical Examination Wiberg, Rebecca Andersson, Magnus N. Svensson, Johan Rosén, Anna Koch, Freja Björkgren, Annika Sund, Malin Ann Surg Oncol Breast Oncology BACKGROUND: Women with an increased hereditary risk of breast cancer can undergo prophylactic mastectomy (PM), which provides a significant, but not total, risk reduction. There is an ongoing discussion about how much skin and subcutaneous tissue should be resected to perform an adequate PM while leaving viable skin flaps. METHODS: Forty-five women who had undergone PM were examined with magnetic resonance tomography (MRT), ultrasound (US) and clinical examination (CE) by a plastic surgeon and a general surgeon to estimate skin flap thickness. RESULTS: The estimated mean skin flap thickness after PM was 13.3 (± 9.6), 7.0 (± 3.3), 6.9 (± 2.8) and 7.4 (± 2.8) mm following MRT, US, and CE performed by a plastic surgeon and a general surgeon, respectively. The mean difference in estimated skin flap thickness was significant between MRT and the other measuring methods, while there was no significant difference between US and CE, nor between CE performed by the surgeons. The mean skin flap thickness was significantly affected by the age at PM. Following PM, necrosis was detected in 7/23 (30.4%) of the breasts in skin flaps ≤ 5 mm and in 5/46 (10.9%) of the breasts in skin flaps > 5 mm (OR 6.29; CI 1.20–32.94; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: The odds of getting postoperative necrosis was > 6 times higher in skin flaps ≤ 5 mm. Thus, if the degree of remaining glandular tissue is acceptably low, it is desirable to create skin flaps thicker than 5 mm to prevent wound healing problems after the PM procedure. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1245/s10434-019-08157-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-01-06 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7311506/ /pubmed/31907748 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08157-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Breast Oncology
Wiberg, Rebecca
Andersson, Magnus N.
Svensson, Johan
Rosén, Anna
Koch, Freja
Björkgren, Annika
Sund, Malin
Prophylactic Mastectomy: Postoperative Skin Flap Thickness Evaluated by MRT, Ultrasound and Clinical Examination
title Prophylactic Mastectomy: Postoperative Skin Flap Thickness Evaluated by MRT, Ultrasound and Clinical Examination
title_full Prophylactic Mastectomy: Postoperative Skin Flap Thickness Evaluated by MRT, Ultrasound and Clinical Examination
title_fullStr Prophylactic Mastectomy: Postoperative Skin Flap Thickness Evaluated by MRT, Ultrasound and Clinical Examination
title_full_unstemmed Prophylactic Mastectomy: Postoperative Skin Flap Thickness Evaluated by MRT, Ultrasound and Clinical Examination
title_short Prophylactic Mastectomy: Postoperative Skin Flap Thickness Evaluated by MRT, Ultrasound and Clinical Examination
title_sort prophylactic mastectomy: postoperative skin flap thickness evaluated by mrt, ultrasound and clinical examination
topic Breast Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31907748
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-019-08157-2
work_keys_str_mv AT wibergrebecca prophylacticmastectomypostoperativeskinflapthicknessevaluatedbymrtultrasoundandclinicalexamination
AT anderssonmagnusn prophylacticmastectomypostoperativeskinflapthicknessevaluatedbymrtultrasoundandclinicalexamination
AT svenssonjohan prophylacticmastectomypostoperativeskinflapthicknessevaluatedbymrtultrasoundandclinicalexamination
AT rosenanna prophylacticmastectomypostoperativeskinflapthicknessevaluatedbymrtultrasoundandclinicalexamination
AT kochfreja prophylacticmastectomypostoperativeskinflapthicknessevaluatedbymrtultrasoundandclinicalexamination
AT bjorkgrenannika prophylacticmastectomypostoperativeskinflapthicknessevaluatedbymrtultrasoundandclinicalexamination
AT sundmalin prophylacticmastectomypostoperativeskinflapthicknessevaluatedbymrtultrasoundandclinicalexamination