Cargando…

Prosocial Preferences Condition Decision Effort and Ingroup Biased Generosity in Intergroup Decision-Making

Ingroup favoritism and discrimination against outgroups are pervasive in social interactions. To uncover the cognitive processes underlying generosity towards in- and outgroup members, we employ eye-tracking in two pre registered studies. We replicate the well-established ingroup favoritism effect a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahal, Rima-Maria, Fiedler, Susann, De Dreu, Carsten K. W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64592-2
_version_ 1783549565402611712
author Rahal, Rima-Maria
Fiedler, Susann
De Dreu, Carsten K. W.
author_facet Rahal, Rima-Maria
Fiedler, Susann
De Dreu, Carsten K. W.
author_sort Rahal, Rima-Maria
collection PubMed
description Ingroup favoritism and discrimination against outgroups are pervasive in social interactions. To uncover the cognitive processes underlying generosity towards in- and outgroup members, we employ eye-tracking in two pre registered studies. We replicate the well-established ingroup favoritism effect and uncover that ingroup compared to outgroup decision settings are characterized by systematic differences in information search effort (i.e., increased response times and number of fixations, more inspected information) and attention distribution. Surprisingly, these results showed a stronger dependency on the in- vs. out-group setting for more individualistic compared to prosocial participants: Whereas individualistic decision makers invested relatively less effort into information search when decisions involved out-group members, prosocial decision makers’ effort differed less between in- and outgroup decisions. Therein, choice and processing findings showed differences, indicating that inferences about the decision process from choices alone can be misleading. Implications for intergroup research and the regulation of intergroup conflict are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7311554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73115542020-06-25 Prosocial Preferences Condition Decision Effort and Ingroup Biased Generosity in Intergroup Decision-Making Rahal, Rima-Maria Fiedler, Susann De Dreu, Carsten K. W. Sci Rep Article Ingroup favoritism and discrimination against outgroups are pervasive in social interactions. To uncover the cognitive processes underlying generosity towards in- and outgroup members, we employ eye-tracking in two pre registered studies. We replicate the well-established ingroup favoritism effect and uncover that ingroup compared to outgroup decision settings are characterized by systematic differences in information search effort (i.e., increased response times and number of fixations, more inspected information) and attention distribution. Surprisingly, these results showed a stronger dependency on the in- vs. out-group setting for more individualistic compared to prosocial participants: Whereas individualistic decision makers invested relatively less effort into information search when decisions involved out-group members, prosocial decision makers’ effort differed less between in- and outgroup decisions. Therein, choice and processing findings showed differences, indicating that inferences about the decision process from choices alone can be misleading. Implications for intergroup research and the regulation of intergroup conflict are discussed. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7311554/ /pubmed/32576839 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64592-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Rahal, Rima-Maria
Fiedler, Susann
De Dreu, Carsten K. W.
Prosocial Preferences Condition Decision Effort and Ingroup Biased Generosity in Intergroup Decision-Making
title Prosocial Preferences Condition Decision Effort and Ingroup Biased Generosity in Intergroup Decision-Making
title_full Prosocial Preferences Condition Decision Effort and Ingroup Biased Generosity in Intergroup Decision-Making
title_fullStr Prosocial Preferences Condition Decision Effort and Ingroup Biased Generosity in Intergroup Decision-Making
title_full_unstemmed Prosocial Preferences Condition Decision Effort and Ingroup Biased Generosity in Intergroup Decision-Making
title_short Prosocial Preferences Condition Decision Effort and Ingroup Biased Generosity in Intergroup Decision-Making
title_sort prosocial preferences condition decision effort and ingroup biased generosity in intergroup decision-making
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576839
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64592-2
work_keys_str_mv AT rahalrimamaria prosocialpreferencesconditiondecisioneffortandingroupbiasedgenerosityinintergroupdecisionmaking
AT fiedlersusann prosocialpreferencesconditiondecisioneffortandingroupbiasedgenerosityinintergroupdecisionmaking
AT dedreucarstenkw prosocialpreferencesconditiondecisioneffortandingroupbiasedgenerosityinintergroupdecisionmaking