Cargando…

Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed

The supply–demand risk assessment of ecosystem services (ES) can identify the supply–demand risk level, which is very important for the sustainable management of regional ES. In this study, taking the Fenghe River watershed (FRW) as a case, based on the status and the change trend of the supply–dema...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Hongjuan, Feng, Juan, Zhang, Zhicheng, Liu, Kang, Gao, Xin, Wang, Zidong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32526942
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114112
_version_ 1783549634304540672
author Zhang, Hongjuan
Feng, Juan
Zhang, Zhicheng
Liu, Kang
Gao, Xin
Wang, Zidong
author_facet Zhang, Hongjuan
Feng, Juan
Zhang, Zhicheng
Liu, Kang
Gao, Xin
Wang, Zidong
author_sort Zhang, Hongjuan
collection PubMed
description The supply–demand risk assessment of ecosystem services (ES) can identify the supply–demand risk level, which is very important for the sustainable management of regional ES. In this study, taking the Fenghe River watershed (FRW) as a case, based on the status and the change trend of the supply–demand ratio of ES, and the ES supply change trend, the supply–demand risk level of food provision (FP), water yield (WY), soil retention (SR), and climate regulation (CR) are evaluated, and the risk management zones of the FRW are divided using spatial superposition. The results show that: (1) The supply and demand of SR are spatially matched, while the other three ES are spatially mismatched. (2) From 2000 to 2015, the supply amount of FP, WY, and SR increases by 11.59%, 1.25% and 55%, respectively, while the supply amount of CR decreases by 5.15%. At the same time, the demand amount of FP, WY, SR and CR increases by 39.97%, 53.88%, 36.3% and 215.5%, respectively. (3) The supply–demand ratio means of four ES in the FRW are all greater than 0, but there are some areas within that are less than 0. (4) In terms of sub-watershed scale, except for SR, there are critically endangered areas for the other three ES. Moreover, the FRW is divided into 11 supply–demand risk management zones, such as FS-WY-CR critically endangered zone, WY-CR critically endangered and FS vulnerable zone. The supply–demand risk management zones based on multiple ES can identify the risk level of each ES in each zone. These results and conclusions can provide the basis for rational allocation of resources and sustainable management of ES.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7312005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73120052020-06-25 Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed Zhang, Hongjuan Feng, Juan Zhang, Zhicheng Liu, Kang Gao, Xin Wang, Zidong Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The supply–demand risk assessment of ecosystem services (ES) can identify the supply–demand risk level, which is very important for the sustainable management of regional ES. In this study, taking the Fenghe River watershed (FRW) as a case, based on the status and the change trend of the supply–demand ratio of ES, and the ES supply change trend, the supply–demand risk level of food provision (FP), water yield (WY), soil retention (SR), and climate regulation (CR) are evaluated, and the risk management zones of the FRW are divided using spatial superposition. The results show that: (1) The supply and demand of SR are spatially matched, while the other three ES are spatially mismatched. (2) From 2000 to 2015, the supply amount of FP, WY, and SR increases by 11.59%, 1.25% and 55%, respectively, while the supply amount of CR decreases by 5.15%. At the same time, the demand amount of FP, WY, SR and CR increases by 39.97%, 53.88%, 36.3% and 215.5%, respectively. (3) The supply–demand ratio means of four ES in the FRW are all greater than 0, but there are some areas within that are less than 0. (4) In terms of sub-watershed scale, except for SR, there are critically endangered areas for the other three ES. Moreover, the FRW is divided into 11 supply–demand risk management zones, such as FS-WY-CR critically endangered zone, WY-CR critically endangered and FS vulnerable zone. The supply–demand risk management zones based on multiple ES can identify the risk level of each ES in each zone. These results and conclusions can provide the basis for rational allocation of resources and sustainable management of ES. MDPI 2020-06-09 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7312005/ /pubmed/32526942 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114112 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Hongjuan
Feng, Juan
Zhang, Zhicheng
Liu, Kang
Gao, Xin
Wang, Zidong
Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed
title Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed
title_full Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed
title_fullStr Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed
title_full_unstemmed Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed
title_short Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed
title_sort regional spatial management based on supply–demand risk of ecosystem services—a case study of the fenghe river watershed
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32526942
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114112
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghongjuan regionalspatialmanagementbasedonsupplydemandriskofecosystemservicesacasestudyofthefengheriverwatershed
AT fengjuan regionalspatialmanagementbasedonsupplydemandriskofecosystemservicesacasestudyofthefengheriverwatershed
AT zhangzhicheng regionalspatialmanagementbasedonsupplydemandriskofecosystemservicesacasestudyofthefengheriverwatershed
AT liukang regionalspatialmanagementbasedonsupplydemandriskofecosystemservicesacasestudyofthefengheriverwatershed
AT gaoxin regionalspatialmanagementbasedonsupplydemandriskofecosystemservicesacasestudyofthefengheriverwatershed
AT wangzidong regionalspatialmanagementbasedonsupplydemandriskofecosystemservicesacasestudyofthefengheriverwatershed