Cargando…
Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed
The supply–demand risk assessment of ecosystem services (ES) can identify the supply–demand risk level, which is very important for the sustainable management of regional ES. In this study, taking the Fenghe River watershed (FRW) as a case, based on the status and the change trend of the supply–dema...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32526942 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114112 |
_version_ | 1783549634304540672 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Hongjuan Feng, Juan Zhang, Zhicheng Liu, Kang Gao, Xin Wang, Zidong |
author_facet | Zhang, Hongjuan Feng, Juan Zhang, Zhicheng Liu, Kang Gao, Xin Wang, Zidong |
author_sort | Zhang, Hongjuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The supply–demand risk assessment of ecosystem services (ES) can identify the supply–demand risk level, which is very important for the sustainable management of regional ES. In this study, taking the Fenghe River watershed (FRW) as a case, based on the status and the change trend of the supply–demand ratio of ES, and the ES supply change trend, the supply–demand risk level of food provision (FP), water yield (WY), soil retention (SR), and climate regulation (CR) are evaluated, and the risk management zones of the FRW are divided using spatial superposition. The results show that: (1) The supply and demand of SR are spatially matched, while the other three ES are spatially mismatched. (2) From 2000 to 2015, the supply amount of FP, WY, and SR increases by 11.59%, 1.25% and 55%, respectively, while the supply amount of CR decreases by 5.15%. At the same time, the demand amount of FP, WY, SR and CR increases by 39.97%, 53.88%, 36.3% and 215.5%, respectively. (3) The supply–demand ratio means of four ES in the FRW are all greater than 0, but there are some areas within that are less than 0. (4) In terms of sub-watershed scale, except for SR, there are critically endangered areas for the other three ES. Moreover, the FRW is divided into 11 supply–demand risk management zones, such as FS-WY-CR critically endangered zone, WY-CR critically endangered and FS vulnerable zone. The supply–demand risk management zones based on multiple ES can identify the risk level of each ES in each zone. These results and conclusions can provide the basis for rational allocation of resources and sustainable management of ES. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7312005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73120052020-06-25 Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed Zhang, Hongjuan Feng, Juan Zhang, Zhicheng Liu, Kang Gao, Xin Wang, Zidong Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The supply–demand risk assessment of ecosystem services (ES) can identify the supply–demand risk level, which is very important for the sustainable management of regional ES. In this study, taking the Fenghe River watershed (FRW) as a case, based on the status and the change trend of the supply–demand ratio of ES, and the ES supply change trend, the supply–demand risk level of food provision (FP), water yield (WY), soil retention (SR), and climate regulation (CR) are evaluated, and the risk management zones of the FRW are divided using spatial superposition. The results show that: (1) The supply and demand of SR are spatially matched, while the other three ES are spatially mismatched. (2) From 2000 to 2015, the supply amount of FP, WY, and SR increases by 11.59%, 1.25% and 55%, respectively, while the supply amount of CR decreases by 5.15%. At the same time, the demand amount of FP, WY, SR and CR increases by 39.97%, 53.88%, 36.3% and 215.5%, respectively. (3) The supply–demand ratio means of four ES in the FRW are all greater than 0, but there are some areas within that are less than 0. (4) In terms of sub-watershed scale, except for SR, there are critically endangered areas for the other three ES. Moreover, the FRW is divided into 11 supply–demand risk management zones, such as FS-WY-CR critically endangered zone, WY-CR critically endangered and FS vulnerable zone. The supply–demand risk management zones based on multiple ES can identify the risk level of each ES in each zone. These results and conclusions can provide the basis for rational allocation of resources and sustainable management of ES. MDPI 2020-06-09 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7312005/ /pubmed/32526942 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114112 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Hongjuan Feng, Juan Zhang, Zhicheng Liu, Kang Gao, Xin Wang, Zidong Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed |
title | Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed |
title_full | Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed |
title_fullStr | Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed |
title_full_unstemmed | Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed |
title_short | Regional Spatial Management Based on Supply–Demand Risk of Ecosystem Services—A Case Study of the Fenghe River Watershed |
title_sort | regional spatial management based on supply–demand risk of ecosystem services—a case study of the fenghe river watershed |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32526942 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114112 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanghongjuan regionalspatialmanagementbasedonsupplydemandriskofecosystemservicesacasestudyofthefengheriverwatershed AT fengjuan regionalspatialmanagementbasedonsupplydemandriskofecosystemservicesacasestudyofthefengheriverwatershed AT zhangzhicheng regionalspatialmanagementbasedonsupplydemandriskofecosystemservicesacasestudyofthefengheriverwatershed AT liukang regionalspatialmanagementbasedonsupplydemandriskofecosystemservicesacasestudyofthefengheriverwatershed AT gaoxin regionalspatialmanagementbasedonsupplydemandriskofecosystemservicesacasestudyofthefengheriverwatershed AT wangzidong regionalspatialmanagementbasedonsupplydemandriskofecosystemservicesacasestudyofthefengheriverwatershed |