Cargando…

The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Three Dental Universal Adhesives—An In Vitro Study

Dental universal adhesives are considered an useful tool in modern dentistry as they can be used in different etching techniques, allow for simplified protocol and provide sufficient bond strength. However, there is still no consensus as to their toxicity towards pulp. Thus, the present study aimed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wawrzynkiewicz, Adam, Rozpedek-Kaminska, Wioletta, Galita, Grzegorz, Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika, Lapinska, Barbara, Sokolowski, Jerzy, Majsterek, Ireneusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32486393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113950
_version_ 1783549639942733824
author Wawrzynkiewicz, Adam
Rozpedek-Kaminska, Wioletta
Galita, Grzegorz
Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
Lapinska, Barbara
Sokolowski, Jerzy
Majsterek, Ireneusz
author_facet Wawrzynkiewicz, Adam
Rozpedek-Kaminska, Wioletta
Galita, Grzegorz
Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
Lapinska, Barbara
Sokolowski, Jerzy
Majsterek, Ireneusz
author_sort Wawrzynkiewicz, Adam
collection PubMed
description Dental universal adhesives are considered an useful tool in modern dentistry as they can be used in different etching techniques, allow for simplified protocol and provide sufficient bond strength. However, there is still no consensus as to their toxicity towards pulp. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of three universal adhesives: OptiBond Universal, Prime&Bond Universal and Adhese in an in vitro experimental model, monocyte/macrophage cell line SC (ATCC CRL-9855). The cytotoxicity was measured by means of XTT assay, whereas the genotoxicity (comet assay) was evaluated based on the percentage of DNA present in the comet tail. Furthermore, the ability of the adhesives to induce apoptosis was analyzed using flow cytometry (FC) with the FITC annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) double staining. The analysis of the cell cycle progression was performed with FC using PI staining. OptiBond Universal presented significant, while Prime&Bond Universal and Adhese Universal had minimal cytotoxicity and genotoxicity towards human SC cells. Moreover, only OptiBond Universal increased the level of apoptosis in SC cell line. None of the adhesives showed significant cell cycle arrest, as revealed by FC analysis. Due to substantial differences in toxicity in in vitro studies of dental adhesives, there is a great need for further research in order to establish more reliable test protocols allowing for standardized methodology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7312029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73120292020-06-25 The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Three Dental Universal Adhesives—An In Vitro Study Wawrzynkiewicz, Adam Rozpedek-Kaminska, Wioletta Galita, Grzegorz Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika Lapinska, Barbara Sokolowski, Jerzy Majsterek, Ireneusz Int J Mol Sci Article Dental universal adhesives are considered an useful tool in modern dentistry as they can be used in different etching techniques, allow for simplified protocol and provide sufficient bond strength. However, there is still no consensus as to their toxicity towards pulp. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of three universal adhesives: OptiBond Universal, Prime&Bond Universal and Adhese in an in vitro experimental model, monocyte/macrophage cell line SC (ATCC CRL-9855). The cytotoxicity was measured by means of XTT assay, whereas the genotoxicity (comet assay) was evaluated based on the percentage of DNA present in the comet tail. Furthermore, the ability of the adhesives to induce apoptosis was analyzed using flow cytometry (FC) with the FITC annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) double staining. The analysis of the cell cycle progression was performed with FC using PI staining. OptiBond Universal presented significant, while Prime&Bond Universal and Adhese Universal had minimal cytotoxicity and genotoxicity towards human SC cells. Moreover, only OptiBond Universal increased the level of apoptosis in SC cell line. None of the adhesives showed significant cell cycle arrest, as revealed by FC analysis. Due to substantial differences in toxicity in in vitro studies of dental adhesives, there is a great need for further research in order to establish more reliable test protocols allowing for standardized methodology. MDPI 2020-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7312029/ /pubmed/32486393 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113950 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wawrzynkiewicz, Adam
Rozpedek-Kaminska, Wioletta
Galita, Grzegorz
Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
Lapinska, Barbara
Sokolowski, Jerzy
Majsterek, Ireneusz
The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Three Dental Universal Adhesives—An In Vitro Study
title The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Three Dental Universal Adhesives—An In Vitro Study
title_full The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Three Dental Universal Adhesives—An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Three Dental Universal Adhesives—An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Three Dental Universal Adhesives—An In Vitro Study
title_short The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Three Dental Universal Adhesives—An In Vitro Study
title_sort cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of three dental universal adhesives—an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32486393
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113950
work_keys_str_mv AT wawrzynkiewiczadam thecytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofthreedentaluniversaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT rozpedekkaminskawioletta thecytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofthreedentaluniversaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT galitagrzegorz thecytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofthreedentaluniversaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT lukomskaszymanskamonika thecytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofthreedentaluniversaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT lapinskabarbara thecytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofthreedentaluniversaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT sokolowskijerzy thecytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofthreedentaluniversaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT majsterekireneusz thecytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofthreedentaluniversaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT wawrzynkiewiczadam cytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofthreedentaluniversaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT rozpedekkaminskawioletta cytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofthreedentaluniversaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT galitagrzegorz cytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofthreedentaluniversaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT lukomskaszymanskamonika cytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofthreedentaluniversaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT lapinskabarbara cytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofthreedentaluniversaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT sokolowskijerzy cytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofthreedentaluniversaladhesivesaninvitrostudy
AT majsterekireneusz cytotoxicityandgenotoxicityofthreedentaluniversaladhesivesaninvitrostudy