Cargando…
A Scoping Review of Technological Approaches to Environmental Monitoring
Indoor environment quality (IEQ) can negatively affect occupant health and wellbeing. Air quality, as well as thermal, visual and auditory conditions, can determine how comfortable occupants feel within buildings. Some can be measured objectively, but many are assessed by interpreting qualitative re...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32512865 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113995 |
_version_ | 1783549653533327360 |
---|---|
author | Coulby, Graham Clear, Adrian Jones, Oliver Godfrey, Alan |
author_facet | Coulby, Graham Clear, Adrian Jones, Oliver Godfrey, Alan |
author_sort | Coulby, Graham |
collection | PubMed |
description | Indoor environment quality (IEQ) can negatively affect occupant health and wellbeing. Air quality, as well as thermal, visual and auditory conditions, can determine how comfortable occupants feel within buildings. Some can be measured objectively, but many are assessed by interpreting qualitative responses. Continuous monitoring by passive sensors may be useful to identify links between environmental and physiological changes. Few studies localise measurements to an occupant level perhaps due to many environmental monitoring solutions being large and expensive. Traditional models for occupant comfort analysis often exacerbate this by not differentiating between individual building occupants. This scoping review aims to understand IEQ and explore approaches as to how it is measured with various sensing technologies, identifying trends for monitoring occupant health and wellbeing. Twenty-seven studies were reviewed, and more than 60 state-of-the-art and low-cost IEQ sensors identified. Studies were found to focus on the home or workplace, but not both. This review also found how wearable technology could be used to augment IEQ measurements, creating personalised approaches to health and wellbeing. Opportunities exist to make individuals the primary unit of analysis. Future research should explore holistic personalised approaches to health monitoring in buildings that analyse the individual as they move between environments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7312086 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73120862020-06-25 A Scoping Review of Technological Approaches to Environmental Monitoring Coulby, Graham Clear, Adrian Jones, Oliver Godfrey, Alan Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Indoor environment quality (IEQ) can negatively affect occupant health and wellbeing. Air quality, as well as thermal, visual and auditory conditions, can determine how comfortable occupants feel within buildings. Some can be measured objectively, but many are assessed by interpreting qualitative responses. Continuous monitoring by passive sensors may be useful to identify links between environmental and physiological changes. Few studies localise measurements to an occupant level perhaps due to many environmental monitoring solutions being large and expensive. Traditional models for occupant comfort analysis often exacerbate this by not differentiating between individual building occupants. This scoping review aims to understand IEQ and explore approaches as to how it is measured with various sensing technologies, identifying trends for monitoring occupant health and wellbeing. Twenty-seven studies were reviewed, and more than 60 state-of-the-art and low-cost IEQ sensors identified. Studies were found to focus on the home or workplace, but not both. This review also found how wearable technology could be used to augment IEQ measurements, creating personalised approaches to health and wellbeing. Opportunities exist to make individuals the primary unit of analysis. Future research should explore holistic personalised approaches to health monitoring in buildings that analyse the individual as they move between environments. MDPI 2020-06-04 2020-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7312086/ /pubmed/32512865 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113995 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Coulby, Graham Clear, Adrian Jones, Oliver Godfrey, Alan A Scoping Review of Technological Approaches to Environmental Monitoring |
title | A Scoping Review of Technological Approaches to Environmental Monitoring |
title_full | A Scoping Review of Technological Approaches to Environmental Monitoring |
title_fullStr | A Scoping Review of Technological Approaches to Environmental Monitoring |
title_full_unstemmed | A Scoping Review of Technological Approaches to Environmental Monitoring |
title_short | A Scoping Review of Technological Approaches to Environmental Monitoring |
title_sort | scoping review of technological approaches to environmental monitoring |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312086/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32512865 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113995 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coulbygraham ascopingreviewoftechnologicalapproachestoenvironmentalmonitoring AT clearadrian ascopingreviewoftechnologicalapproachestoenvironmentalmonitoring AT jonesoliver ascopingreviewoftechnologicalapproachestoenvironmentalmonitoring AT godfreyalan ascopingreviewoftechnologicalapproachestoenvironmentalmonitoring AT coulbygraham scopingreviewoftechnologicalapproachestoenvironmentalmonitoring AT clearadrian scopingreviewoftechnologicalapproachestoenvironmentalmonitoring AT jonesoliver scopingreviewoftechnologicalapproachestoenvironmentalmonitoring AT godfreyalan scopingreviewoftechnologicalapproachestoenvironmentalmonitoring |