Cargando…

Clinical Test Performance of a Rapid Point-of-Care Syphilis Treponemal Antibody Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

We reviewed relevant syphilis diagnostic literature and conducted a meta-analysis to address the question, “What is the sensitivity and specificity of the Syphilis Health Check, a rapid qualitative test for the detection of human antibodies to Treponema pallidum.” The Syphilis Health Check is the on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bristow, Claire C, Klausner, Jeffrey D, Tran, Anthony
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32578863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa350
_version_ 1783549681119264768
author Bristow, Claire C
Klausner, Jeffrey D
Tran, Anthony
author_facet Bristow, Claire C
Klausner, Jeffrey D
Tran, Anthony
author_sort Bristow, Claire C
collection PubMed
description We reviewed relevant syphilis diagnostic literature and conducted a meta-analysis to address the question, “What is the sensitivity and specificity of the Syphilis Health Check, a rapid qualitative test for the detection of human antibodies to Treponema pallidum.” The Syphilis Health Check is the only rapid syphilis test currently cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis using Bayesian bivariate random-effects and fixed-effect models to create pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity of the Syphilis Health Check. We identified 5 test evaluations published in the literature and 10 studies submitted to the FDA and for a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments waiver application. The pooled sensitivity (95% CI) from the laboratory evaluations (n = 5) was 98.5% (92.1–100%), while pooled specificity was 95.9% (81.5–100.0%). The pooled sensitivity for prospective studies (n = 10) was 87.7% ( 71.8–97.2%), while pooled specificity was 96.7% (91.9–99.2%). Using nontreponemal supplemental testing, the sensitivity improved to a pooled sensitivity of 97.0% (94.8–98.6%). The Syphilis Health Check may provide accurate detection of treponemal antibody.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7312211
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73122112020-06-29 Clinical Test Performance of a Rapid Point-of-Care Syphilis Treponemal Antibody Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Bristow, Claire C Klausner, Jeffrey D Tran, Anthony Clin Infect Dis Supplement Articles We reviewed relevant syphilis diagnostic literature and conducted a meta-analysis to address the question, “What is the sensitivity and specificity of the Syphilis Health Check, a rapid qualitative test for the detection of human antibodies to Treponema pallidum.” The Syphilis Health Check is the only rapid syphilis test currently cleared by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). We conducted a systematic review and a meta-analysis using Bayesian bivariate random-effects and fixed-effect models to create pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity of the Syphilis Health Check. We identified 5 test evaluations published in the literature and 10 studies submitted to the FDA and for a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments waiver application. The pooled sensitivity (95% CI) from the laboratory evaluations (n = 5) was 98.5% (92.1–100%), while pooled specificity was 95.9% (81.5–100.0%). The pooled sensitivity for prospective studies (n = 10) was 87.7% ( 71.8–97.2%), while pooled specificity was 96.7% (91.9–99.2%). Using nontreponemal supplemental testing, the sensitivity improved to a pooled sensitivity of 97.0% (94.8–98.6%). The Syphilis Health Check may provide accurate detection of treponemal antibody. Oxford University Press 2020-07-01 2020-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7312211/ /pubmed/32578863 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa350 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Articles
Bristow, Claire C
Klausner, Jeffrey D
Tran, Anthony
Clinical Test Performance of a Rapid Point-of-Care Syphilis Treponemal Antibody Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title Clinical Test Performance of a Rapid Point-of-Care Syphilis Treponemal Antibody Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full Clinical Test Performance of a Rapid Point-of-Care Syphilis Treponemal Antibody Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_fullStr Clinical Test Performance of a Rapid Point-of-Care Syphilis Treponemal Antibody Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Test Performance of a Rapid Point-of-Care Syphilis Treponemal Antibody Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_short Clinical Test Performance of a Rapid Point-of-Care Syphilis Treponemal Antibody Test: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
title_sort clinical test performance of a rapid point-of-care syphilis treponemal antibody test: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Supplement Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312211/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32578863
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa350
work_keys_str_mv AT bristowclairec clinicaltestperformanceofarapidpointofcaresyphilistreponemalantibodytestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT klausnerjeffreyd clinicaltestperformanceofarapidpointofcaresyphilistreponemalantibodytestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT trananthony clinicaltestperformanceofarapidpointofcaresyphilistreponemalantibodytestasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis