Cargando…

Sensitivity and Specificity of Treponemal-specific Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis

We conducted a systematic review of relevant syphilis diagnostic literature to address the question, “What is the sensitivity and specificity of the treponemal tests currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the diagnosis of syphilis (by stage)?” There were 16 treponemal assay...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Ina U, Tran, Anthony, Pereira, Lara, Fakile, Yetunde
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32578866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa349
_version_ 1783549682053545984
author Park, Ina U
Tran, Anthony
Pereira, Lara
Fakile, Yetunde
author_facet Park, Ina U
Tran, Anthony
Pereira, Lara
Fakile, Yetunde
author_sort Park, Ina U
collection PubMed
description We conducted a systematic review of relevant syphilis diagnostic literature to address the question, “What is the sensitivity and specificity of the treponemal tests currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the diagnosis of syphilis (by stage)?” There were 16 treponemal assays evaluated: 13 immunoassays and 3 manual assays (fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed test [FTA-ABS], microhemagglutination assay for Treponema pallidum antibodies [MHA-TP], Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay [TP-PA]). MHA-TP and FTA-ABS were less sensitive in primary and secondary syphilis than TP-PA; TP-PA is the most specific manual treponemal assay. There is insufficient evidence to recommend one particular treponemal immunoassay (eg, enzyme immunoassays, chemiluminescence immunoassays, microbead immunoassays) over another based on published performance data. For diagnosis of neurosyphilis, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) TP-PA has similar performance to CSF FTA-ABS in studies with patients with definitive or presumptive neurosyphilis. However, CSF treponemal testing has limitations in its sensitivity and specificity and should be interpreted within the context of the clinical scenario, additional CSF test results and syphilis prevalence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7312216
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73122162020-06-29 Sensitivity and Specificity of Treponemal-specific Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis Park, Ina U Tran, Anthony Pereira, Lara Fakile, Yetunde Clin Infect Dis Supplement Articles We conducted a systematic review of relevant syphilis diagnostic literature to address the question, “What is the sensitivity and specificity of the treponemal tests currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the diagnosis of syphilis (by stage)?” There were 16 treponemal assays evaluated: 13 immunoassays and 3 manual assays (fluorescent treponemal antibody absorbed test [FTA-ABS], microhemagglutination assay for Treponema pallidum antibodies [MHA-TP], Treponema pallidum particle agglutination assay [TP-PA]). MHA-TP and FTA-ABS were less sensitive in primary and secondary syphilis than TP-PA; TP-PA is the most specific manual treponemal assay. There is insufficient evidence to recommend one particular treponemal immunoassay (eg, enzyme immunoassays, chemiluminescence immunoassays, microbead immunoassays) over another based on published performance data. For diagnosis of neurosyphilis, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) TP-PA has similar performance to CSF FTA-ABS in studies with patients with definitive or presumptive neurosyphilis. However, CSF treponemal testing has limitations in its sensitivity and specificity and should be interpreted within the context of the clinical scenario, additional CSF test results and syphilis prevalence. Oxford University Press 2020-07-01 2020-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7312216/ /pubmed/32578866 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa349 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Supplement Articles
Park, Ina U
Tran, Anthony
Pereira, Lara
Fakile, Yetunde
Sensitivity and Specificity of Treponemal-specific Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis
title Sensitivity and Specificity of Treponemal-specific Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis
title_full Sensitivity and Specificity of Treponemal-specific Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis
title_fullStr Sensitivity and Specificity of Treponemal-specific Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity and Specificity of Treponemal-specific Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis
title_short Sensitivity and Specificity of Treponemal-specific Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis
title_sort sensitivity and specificity of treponemal-specific tests for the diagnosis of syphilis
topic Supplement Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312216/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32578866
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa349
work_keys_str_mv AT parkinau sensitivityandspecificityoftreponemalspecifictestsforthediagnosisofsyphilis
AT trananthony sensitivityandspecificityoftreponemalspecifictestsforthediagnosisofsyphilis
AT pereiralara sensitivityandspecificityoftreponemalspecifictestsforthediagnosisofsyphilis
AT fakileyetunde sensitivityandspecificityoftreponemalspecifictestsforthediagnosisofsyphilis