Cargando…
Interpreting cost-effectiveness ratios in a cost-effectiveness analysis of risk-tailored prostate screening: A critique of Callender et al.
Callender et al. recently published a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of a risk-tailored approach to prostate cancer screening. It considers the costs and effects of prostate cancer screening offered to all men aged 55-69 without any risk selection and, alternatively, over a range of risk-ta...
Autor principal: | O'Mahony, James F. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
F1000 Research Limited
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312227/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32596631 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13043.2 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Cost-effectiveness of population-based screening for colorectal cancer
por: O'Mahony, J F
Publicado: (2013) -
Systematic review searches must be systematic, comprehensive, and transparent: a critique of Perman et al
por: Greyson, Devon, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Unsparing self-critique strengthens the field, but Bailey et al. overstate the ‘problems with delay discounting’
por: Stein, Jeffrey S., et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Risk Stratification in Cost-Effectiveness Analyses of Cancer
Screening: Intervention Eligibility, Strategy Choice, and
Optimality
por: O’Mahony, James F.
Publicado: (2021) -
Issues with reporting and interpretation of Khan et al. 2021
por: DeVito, Nicholas J., et al.
Publicado: (2022)