Cargando…

Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study

BACKGROUND: International hospital accreditation instruments, such as Joint Commission International (JCI) and Qmentum, focus mainly on hospital policy and procedures and do not specifically cover a profession such as hospital-based physiotherapy. This justifies the need for a quality system to whic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steenbruggen, Rudi A, van Oorsouw, Roel, Maas, Marjo, Hoogeboom, Thomas J, Brand, Paul, van der Wees, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000812
_version_ 1783549730778775552
author Steenbruggen, Rudi A
van Oorsouw, Roel
Maas, Marjo
Hoogeboom, Thomas J
Brand, Paul
van der Wees, Philip
author_facet Steenbruggen, Rudi A
van Oorsouw, Roel
Maas, Marjo
Hoogeboom, Thomas J
Brand, Paul
van der Wees, Philip
author_sort Steenbruggen, Rudi A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: International hospital accreditation instruments, such as Joint Commission International (JCI) and Qmentum, focus mainly on hospital policy and procedures and do not specifically cover a profession such as hospital-based physiotherapy. This justifies the need for a quality system to which hospital-based physiotherapy can better identify, based on a common framework of quality indicators for effective quality management. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the most important quality indicators of a hospital-based physiotherapy department in the eyes of hospital-based physiotherapists and their managers. METHODS: Based on input from three focus groups and a structured literature review, a first set of quality indicators for hospital physiotherapy was assembled. After checking this set for duplicates and for overlap with JCI and Qmentum, it formed the starting point of a modified Delphi procedure. In two rounds, 17 hospital-based physiotherapy experts rated the quality indicators on relevance through online surveys. In a final consensus meeting, quality indicators were established, classified in quality themes and operationalised by describing for each theme the rationale, specifications, domain and type of indicator. RESULTS: Three focus groups provided 120 potential indicators, which were complemented with 18 potential indicators based on literature. After duplicate and overlap check and the Delphi procedure, these 138 potential indicators were reduced to a set of 56 quality indicators for hospital-based physiotherapy. Finally, these 56 indicators were condensed into 7 composite indicators, each representing a quality theme based on definitions of the European Foundation for Quality Management. CONCLUSION: A set of 56 quality indicators, condensed into 7 composite indicators each representing a quality theme, was developed to assess the quality of a hospital-based physiotherapy department.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7312452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73124522020-06-26 Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study Steenbruggen, Rudi A van Oorsouw, Roel Maas, Marjo Hoogeboom, Thomas J Brand, Paul van der Wees, Philip BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: International hospital accreditation instruments, such as Joint Commission International (JCI) and Qmentum, focus mainly on hospital policy and procedures and do not specifically cover a profession such as hospital-based physiotherapy. This justifies the need for a quality system to which hospital-based physiotherapy can better identify, based on a common framework of quality indicators for effective quality management. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the most important quality indicators of a hospital-based physiotherapy department in the eyes of hospital-based physiotherapists and their managers. METHODS: Based on input from three focus groups and a structured literature review, a first set of quality indicators for hospital physiotherapy was assembled. After checking this set for duplicates and for overlap with JCI and Qmentum, it formed the starting point of a modified Delphi procedure. In two rounds, 17 hospital-based physiotherapy experts rated the quality indicators on relevance through online surveys. In a final consensus meeting, quality indicators were established, classified in quality themes and operationalised by describing for each theme the rationale, specifications, domain and type of indicator. RESULTS: Three focus groups provided 120 potential indicators, which were complemented with 18 potential indicators based on literature. After duplicate and overlap check and the Delphi procedure, these 138 potential indicators were reduced to a set of 56 quality indicators for hospital-based physiotherapy. Finally, these 56 indicators were condensed into 7 composite indicators, each representing a quality theme based on definitions of the European Foundation for Quality Management. CONCLUSION: A set of 56 quality indicators, condensed into 7 composite indicators each representing a quality theme, was developed to assess the quality of a hospital-based physiotherapy department. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7312452/ /pubmed/32576577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000812 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Steenbruggen, Rudi A
van Oorsouw, Roel
Maas, Marjo
Hoogeboom, Thomas J
Brand, Paul
van der Wees, Philip
Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study
title Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study
title_full Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study
title_fullStr Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study
title_short Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study
title_sort development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified delphi study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576577
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000812
work_keys_str_mv AT steenbruggenrudia developmentofqualityindicatorsfordepartmentsofhospitalbasedphysiotherapyamodifieddelphistudy
AT vanoorsouwroel developmentofqualityindicatorsfordepartmentsofhospitalbasedphysiotherapyamodifieddelphistudy
AT maasmarjo developmentofqualityindicatorsfordepartmentsofhospitalbasedphysiotherapyamodifieddelphistudy
AT hoogeboomthomasj developmentofqualityindicatorsfordepartmentsofhospitalbasedphysiotherapyamodifieddelphistudy
AT brandpaul developmentofqualityindicatorsfordepartmentsofhospitalbasedphysiotherapyamodifieddelphistudy
AT vanderweesphilip developmentofqualityindicatorsfordepartmentsofhospitalbasedphysiotherapyamodifieddelphistudy