Cargando…
Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study
BACKGROUND: International hospital accreditation instruments, such as Joint Commission International (JCI) and Qmentum, focus mainly on hospital policy and procedures and do not specifically cover a profession such as hospital-based physiotherapy. This justifies the need for a quality system to whic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000812 |
_version_ | 1783549730778775552 |
---|---|
author | Steenbruggen, Rudi A van Oorsouw, Roel Maas, Marjo Hoogeboom, Thomas J Brand, Paul van der Wees, Philip |
author_facet | Steenbruggen, Rudi A van Oorsouw, Roel Maas, Marjo Hoogeboom, Thomas J Brand, Paul van der Wees, Philip |
author_sort | Steenbruggen, Rudi A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: International hospital accreditation instruments, such as Joint Commission International (JCI) and Qmentum, focus mainly on hospital policy and procedures and do not specifically cover a profession such as hospital-based physiotherapy. This justifies the need for a quality system to which hospital-based physiotherapy can better identify, based on a common framework of quality indicators for effective quality management. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the most important quality indicators of a hospital-based physiotherapy department in the eyes of hospital-based physiotherapists and their managers. METHODS: Based on input from three focus groups and a structured literature review, a first set of quality indicators for hospital physiotherapy was assembled. After checking this set for duplicates and for overlap with JCI and Qmentum, it formed the starting point of a modified Delphi procedure. In two rounds, 17 hospital-based physiotherapy experts rated the quality indicators on relevance through online surveys. In a final consensus meeting, quality indicators were established, classified in quality themes and operationalised by describing for each theme the rationale, specifications, domain and type of indicator. RESULTS: Three focus groups provided 120 potential indicators, which were complemented with 18 potential indicators based on literature. After duplicate and overlap check and the Delphi procedure, these 138 potential indicators were reduced to a set of 56 quality indicators for hospital-based physiotherapy. Finally, these 56 indicators were condensed into 7 composite indicators, each representing a quality theme based on definitions of the European Foundation for Quality Management. CONCLUSION: A set of 56 quality indicators, condensed into 7 composite indicators each representing a quality theme, was developed to assess the quality of a hospital-based physiotherapy department. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7312452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73124522020-06-26 Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study Steenbruggen, Rudi A van Oorsouw, Roel Maas, Marjo Hoogeboom, Thomas J Brand, Paul van der Wees, Philip BMJ Open Qual Original Research BACKGROUND: International hospital accreditation instruments, such as Joint Commission International (JCI) and Qmentum, focus mainly on hospital policy and procedures and do not specifically cover a profession such as hospital-based physiotherapy. This justifies the need for a quality system to which hospital-based physiotherapy can better identify, based on a common framework of quality indicators for effective quality management. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the most important quality indicators of a hospital-based physiotherapy department in the eyes of hospital-based physiotherapists and their managers. METHODS: Based on input from three focus groups and a structured literature review, a first set of quality indicators for hospital physiotherapy was assembled. After checking this set for duplicates and for overlap with JCI and Qmentum, it formed the starting point of a modified Delphi procedure. In two rounds, 17 hospital-based physiotherapy experts rated the quality indicators on relevance through online surveys. In a final consensus meeting, quality indicators were established, classified in quality themes and operationalised by describing for each theme the rationale, specifications, domain and type of indicator. RESULTS: Three focus groups provided 120 potential indicators, which were complemented with 18 potential indicators based on literature. After duplicate and overlap check and the Delphi procedure, these 138 potential indicators were reduced to a set of 56 quality indicators for hospital-based physiotherapy. Finally, these 56 indicators were condensed into 7 composite indicators, each representing a quality theme based on definitions of the European Foundation for Quality Management. CONCLUSION: A set of 56 quality indicators, condensed into 7 composite indicators each representing a quality theme, was developed to assess the quality of a hospital-based physiotherapy department. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7312452/ /pubmed/32576577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000812 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Steenbruggen, Rudi A van Oorsouw, Roel Maas, Marjo Hoogeboom, Thomas J Brand, Paul van der Wees, Philip Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study |
title | Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study |
title_full | Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study |
title_fullStr | Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study |
title_short | Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study |
title_sort | development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified delphi study |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7312452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32576577 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000812 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT steenbruggenrudia developmentofqualityindicatorsfordepartmentsofhospitalbasedphysiotherapyamodifieddelphistudy AT vanoorsouwroel developmentofqualityindicatorsfordepartmentsofhospitalbasedphysiotherapyamodifieddelphistudy AT maasmarjo developmentofqualityindicatorsfordepartmentsofhospitalbasedphysiotherapyamodifieddelphistudy AT hoogeboomthomasj developmentofqualityindicatorsfordepartmentsofhospitalbasedphysiotherapyamodifieddelphistudy AT brandpaul developmentofqualityindicatorsfordepartmentsofhospitalbasedphysiotherapyamodifieddelphistudy AT vanderweesphilip developmentofqualityindicatorsfordepartmentsofhospitalbasedphysiotherapyamodifieddelphistudy |